反思英国文学研究和社会科学中的 "边缘性 "话语:M. NourbeSe Philip 的 "语言逻辑论述

IF 0.5 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE
John Roache
{"title":"反思英国文学研究和社会科学中的 \"边缘性 \"话语:M. NourbeSe Philip 的 \"语言逻辑论述","authors":"John Roache","doi":"10.1080/0950236x.2023.2295287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite a series of critiques concerning its validity as a tool of socio-political analysis, the notion of ‘marginality’ continues to play a role in a range of important global debates. This articl...","PeriodicalId":45473,"journal":{"name":"TEXTUAL PRACTICE","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking the discourse of ‘marginality’ in English literary studies and the social sciences: M. NourbeSe Philip’s ‘Discourse on the Logic of Language’\",\"authors\":\"John Roache\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0950236x.2023.2295287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite a series of critiques concerning its validity as a tool of socio-political analysis, the notion of ‘marginality’ continues to play a role in a range of important global debates. This articl...\",\"PeriodicalId\":45473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TEXTUAL PRACTICE\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TEXTUAL PRACTICE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236x.2023.2295287\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEXTUAL PRACTICE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236x.2023.2295287","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管 "边缘化 "概念作为一种社会政治分析工具的有效性受到了一系列批评,但它仍在一系列重要的全球辩论中发挥着作用。这篇文章...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rethinking the discourse of ‘marginality’ in English literary studies and the social sciences: M. NourbeSe Philip’s ‘Discourse on the Logic of Language’
Despite a series of critiques concerning its validity as a tool of socio-political analysis, the notion of ‘marginality’ continues to play a role in a range of important global debates. This articl...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
TEXTUAL PRACTICE
TEXTUAL PRACTICE LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Since its launch in 1987, Textual Practice has been Britain"s principal international journal of radical literary studies, continually pressing theory into new engagements. Today, as customary relations among disciplines and media are questioned and transformed, Textual Practice works at the turning points of theory with politics, history and texts. It is intrigued by the processes through which hitherto marginal cultures of ethnicity and sexuality are becoming conceptually central, and by the consequences of these diverse disturbances for educational and cultural institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信