莫西沙星和头孢曲松在慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重期的疗效比较

A. Pak, Inst Med Sci, Anum Ilyas, Hina Saghir, Zunera Jahanzeb, F. Syed, Yagana Iqbal
{"title":"莫西沙星和头孢曲松在慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重期的疗效比较","authors":"A. Pak, Inst Med Sci, Anum Ilyas, Hina Saghir, Zunera Jahanzeb, F. Syed, Yagana Iqbal","doi":"10.48036/apims.v19i2.746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the efficacy of Moxifloxacin and Ceftriaxone in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Methodology: This randomized trial was conducted in the Pulmonology Department, PIMS, Islamabad, between August 2018 and February 2019. Patients were screened from the OPD department, and before randomization, their sputum was collected over 24 hours in a solid, sterile plastic (60 mL) bottle at room temperature. They were randomized equally into two treatment groups using a lottery method. Group A received Moxifloxacin 400 mg orally once daily for five days, and group B received Ceftriaxone 1 g (IV infusion) once daily for five days. All the measurements (dyspnea grading, sputum volume, and character) were taken after five days of antibiotic therapy. Results: The mean age was 60.79 ± 13.34 years in Moxifloxacin and 59.86 ± 12.72 years in the Ceftriaxone group. In Moxifloxacin group, there were 49(68.06%) male and 23(31.94%) females and in the Ceftriaxone group, there were 49(68%) males and 23(31.94%) female cases. In Moxifloxacin, a total of 68(94.4%) cases recovered, while 4 (5.6%) cases did not achieve efficacy, whereas, in the Ceftriaxone group, 54 (75.0%) cases achieved efficacy and 18 (25.0%) were therapy failures. The efficacy of the oral Moxifloxacin group was significantly better than the oral Ceftriaxone group (p-value, < 0.05). Conclusion: The efficacy of Moxifloxacin was better than Ceftriaxone in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.","PeriodicalId":184398,"journal":{"name":"Annals of PIMS-Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Efficacy of Moxifloxacin and Ceftriaxone in Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"authors\":\"A. Pak, Inst Med Sci, Anum Ilyas, Hina Saghir, Zunera Jahanzeb, F. Syed, Yagana Iqbal\",\"doi\":\"10.48036/apims.v19i2.746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To compare the efficacy of Moxifloxacin and Ceftriaxone in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Methodology: This randomized trial was conducted in the Pulmonology Department, PIMS, Islamabad, between August 2018 and February 2019. Patients were screened from the OPD department, and before randomization, their sputum was collected over 24 hours in a solid, sterile plastic (60 mL) bottle at room temperature. They were randomized equally into two treatment groups using a lottery method. Group A received Moxifloxacin 400 mg orally once daily for five days, and group B received Ceftriaxone 1 g (IV infusion) once daily for five days. All the measurements (dyspnea grading, sputum volume, and character) were taken after five days of antibiotic therapy. Results: The mean age was 60.79 ± 13.34 years in Moxifloxacin and 59.86 ± 12.72 years in the Ceftriaxone group. In Moxifloxacin group, there were 49(68.06%) male and 23(31.94%) females and in the Ceftriaxone group, there were 49(68%) males and 23(31.94%) female cases. In Moxifloxacin, a total of 68(94.4%) cases recovered, while 4 (5.6%) cases did not achieve efficacy, whereas, in the Ceftriaxone group, 54 (75.0%) cases achieved efficacy and 18 (25.0%) were therapy failures. The efficacy of the oral Moxifloxacin group was significantly better than the oral Ceftriaxone group (p-value, < 0.05). Conclusion: The efficacy of Moxifloxacin was better than Ceftriaxone in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of PIMS-Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of PIMS-Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48036/apims.v19i2.746\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of PIMS-Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48036/apims.v19i2.746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较莫西沙星和头孢曲松对慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重期的疗效:比较莫西沙星和头孢曲松对慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重期的疗效。方法: 随机试验本随机试验于 2018 年 8 月至 2019 年 2 月期间在伊斯兰堡 PIMS 的肺科进行。患者从门诊部筛选出来,随机分组前,在室温下用固体无菌塑料瓶(60 毫升)收集患者 24 小时内的痰液。采用抽签法将他们平均随机分为两个治疗组。A 组接受莫西沙星 400 毫克口服,每天一次,连续五天;B 组接受头孢曲松 1 克(静脉注射),每天一次,连续五天。抗生素治疗五天后进行所有测量(呼吸困难分级、痰量和特征)。结果莫西沙星组的平均年龄为 60.79 ± 13.34 岁,头孢曲松组的平均年龄为 59.86 ± 12.72 岁。莫西沙星组有49例(68.06%)男性,23例(31.94%)女性;头孢曲松组有49例(68%)男性,23例(31.94%)女性。莫西沙星组共有 68 例(94.4%)痊愈,4 例(5.6%)无效,而头孢曲松组有 54 例(75.0%)痊愈,18 例(25.0%)治疗失败。莫西沙星口服组的疗效明显优于头孢曲松口服组(P 值小于 0.05)。结论莫西沙星对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期的疗效优于头孢曲松。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Efficacy of Moxifloxacin and Ceftriaxone in Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Objective: To compare the efficacy of Moxifloxacin and Ceftriaxone in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Methodology: This randomized trial was conducted in the Pulmonology Department, PIMS, Islamabad, between August 2018 and February 2019. Patients were screened from the OPD department, and before randomization, their sputum was collected over 24 hours in a solid, sterile plastic (60 mL) bottle at room temperature. They were randomized equally into two treatment groups using a lottery method. Group A received Moxifloxacin 400 mg orally once daily for five days, and group B received Ceftriaxone 1 g (IV infusion) once daily for five days. All the measurements (dyspnea grading, sputum volume, and character) were taken after five days of antibiotic therapy. Results: The mean age was 60.79 ± 13.34 years in Moxifloxacin and 59.86 ± 12.72 years in the Ceftriaxone group. In Moxifloxacin group, there were 49(68.06%) male and 23(31.94%) females and in the Ceftriaxone group, there were 49(68%) males and 23(31.94%) female cases. In Moxifloxacin, a total of 68(94.4%) cases recovered, while 4 (5.6%) cases did not achieve efficacy, whereas, in the Ceftriaxone group, 54 (75.0%) cases achieved efficacy and 18 (25.0%) were therapy failures. The efficacy of the oral Moxifloxacin group was significantly better than the oral Ceftriaxone group (p-value, < 0.05). Conclusion: The efficacy of Moxifloxacin was better than Ceftriaxone in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信