弥合社会生命周期评估中的差距:理论和实践贡献

Q4 Psychology
Arij Mohamad Radwan Omar Chabrawi, J. M. Andrade, Marzia Traverzo, C. Ugaya
{"title":"弥合社会生命周期评估中的差距:理论和实践贡献","authors":"Arij Mohamad Radwan Omar Chabrawi, J. M. Andrade, Marzia Traverzo, C. Ugaya","doi":"10.1590/0102.3772e39501.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"– Sustainable development is based on three pillars: environment preservation, cost-effective production and human development. Within this context, emerges Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), a solid methodology for assessing the impact of products and services. Whereas Social LCA (S-LCA) is an early-stage approach, currently under development, requiring theoretical and methodological improvements. This study aimed at mapping the main gaps in S-LCA to identify potential contributions from the Psychology field. A preliminary literature review indicated several constraints: consensus between social indicators; methods for measuring subjective data; predominance of secondary data; underutilization of the Social Sciences, etc. Therefore, this study outlines multiples intersection points where the Social Sciences, more specifically, psychology could contribute to filling some of the theoretical and methodological gaps in S-LCA.","PeriodicalId":35395,"journal":{"name":"Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging the Gaps in Social Life Cycle Assessment: Theoretical and Practical Contributions\",\"authors\":\"Arij Mohamad Radwan Omar Chabrawi, J. M. Andrade, Marzia Traverzo, C. Ugaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0102.3772e39501.en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"– Sustainable development is based on three pillars: environment preservation, cost-effective production and human development. Within this context, emerges Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), a solid methodology for assessing the impact of products and services. Whereas Social LCA (S-LCA) is an early-stage approach, currently under development, requiring theoretical and methodological improvements. This study aimed at mapping the main gaps in S-LCA to identify potential contributions from the Psychology field. A preliminary literature review indicated several constraints: consensus between social indicators; methods for measuring subjective data; predominance of secondary data; underutilization of the Social Sciences, etc. Therefore, this study outlines multiples intersection points where the Social Sciences, more specifically, psychology could contribute to filling some of the theoretical and methodological gaps in S-LCA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e39501.en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e39501.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

- 可持续发展以三大支柱为基础:环境保护、具有成本效益的生产和人类发展。在此背景下,生命周期评估(LCA)应运而生,这是一种评估产品和服务影响的可靠方法。而社会生命周期评估(S-LCA)是一种早期方法,目前正在开发之中,需要在理论和方法上加以改进。本研究旨在绘制 S-LCA 的主要差距图,以确定心理学领域的潜在贡献。初步文献综述显示了几个制约因素:社会指标之间的共识;测量主观数据的方法;二手数据的主导地位;社会科学的利用不足等。因此,本研究概述了社会科学(更具体地说是心理学)在填补 S-LCA 理论和方法空白方面可以做出贡献的多个交叉点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bridging the Gaps in Social Life Cycle Assessment: Theoretical and Practical Contributions
– Sustainable development is based on three pillars: environment preservation, cost-effective production and human development. Within this context, emerges Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), a solid methodology for assessing the impact of products and services. Whereas Social LCA (S-LCA) is an early-stage approach, currently under development, requiring theoretical and methodological improvements. This study aimed at mapping the main gaps in S-LCA to identify potential contributions from the Psychology field. A preliminary literature review indicated several constraints: consensus between social indicators; methods for measuring subjective data; predominance of secondary data; underutilization of the Social Sciences, etc. Therefore, this study outlines multiples intersection points where the Social Sciences, more specifically, psychology could contribute to filling some of the theoretical and methodological gaps in S-LCA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
48 weeks
期刊介绍: Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa is a journal published every three months by Instituto de Psicologia da Universidade de Brasília [Institute of Psychology - University of Brasília]. It aims at publishing original papers related to Psychology that fit into the following categories: research report, theoretical study, report of professional experience, critical literature review, short communication, letter to editor, technical note, review. News may also be published at the editor"s discretion. The authors assume responsibility for the articles signed; opinions and considerations included in the articles do not necessarily express the standing point of the Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信