高等教育委员会质量保证机构(QAA)框架的效率:巴基斯坦大学质量改进小组(QECs)管理人员的看法

Syeda Um E Laila Naqvi, Farah Naz, Iqra Sharif
{"title":"高等教育委员会质量保证机构(QAA)框架的效率:巴基斯坦大学质量改进小组(QECs)管理人员的看法","authors":"Syeda Um E Laila Naqvi, Farah Naz, Iqra Sharif","doi":"10.31703/gsr.2023(viii-ii).43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This qualitative study examined Pakistani Quality Enhancement Cell (QEC) executives' views on the HEC's Quality Assurance and Agency (QAA) framework's effectiveness in higher education. Thematic analysis was used to discover and analyse QEC executives' various viewpoints on the HEC's QAA framework's efficacy using in-depth interviews with 20 purposive sampled participants. Analysis revealed two themes: \"Ideal Role Model\" and \"Loopholes in the Model.\" Within the \"Ideal Role Model\" subject, several interviewees saw the HEC's QAA framework as a thorough and adequate model for ensuring and improving higher education quality. In contrast, the \"Loop Holes in the Model\" topic highlighted most respondents' concerns. This research enhances the knowledge of Pakistan's higher education quality assurance dynamics. This research shows the challenges of ensuring and improving higher education quality from many viewpoints. Addressing these viewpoints and creating a dynamic, adaptive, and culturally relevant quality assurance system are essential for Pakistan's higher education growth.","PeriodicalId":305544,"journal":{"name":"Global Sociological Review","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency of HEC's Quality Assurance Agency's (QAA) Framework: Perceptions of Quality Enhancement Cells' (QECs) Executives of Pakistani Universities\",\"authors\":\"Syeda Um E Laila Naqvi, Farah Naz, Iqra Sharif\",\"doi\":\"10.31703/gsr.2023(viii-ii).43\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This qualitative study examined Pakistani Quality Enhancement Cell (QEC) executives' views on the HEC's Quality Assurance and Agency (QAA) framework's effectiveness in higher education. Thematic analysis was used to discover and analyse QEC executives' various viewpoints on the HEC's QAA framework's efficacy using in-depth interviews with 20 purposive sampled participants. Analysis revealed two themes: \\\"Ideal Role Model\\\" and \\\"Loopholes in the Model.\\\" Within the \\\"Ideal Role Model\\\" subject, several interviewees saw the HEC's QAA framework as a thorough and adequate model for ensuring and improving higher education quality. In contrast, the \\\"Loop Holes in the Model\\\" topic highlighted most respondents' concerns. This research enhances the knowledge of Pakistan's higher education quality assurance dynamics. This research shows the challenges of ensuring and improving higher education quality from many viewpoints. Addressing these viewpoints and creating a dynamic, adaptive, and culturally relevant quality assurance system are essential for Pakistan's higher education growth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":305544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Sociological Review\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Sociological Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2023(viii-ii).43\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2023(viii-ii).43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本定性研究探讨了巴基斯坦质量强化小组(QEC)管理人员对高等教育质量保证和机构(QAA)框架在高等教育中的有效性的看法。通过对 20 名有目的抽样参与者进行深入访谈,采用主题分析法发现并分析了质量强化小组管理人员对高等教育委员会质量保证和机构框架有效性的各种观点。分析揭示了两个主题:"理想的榜样 "和 "榜样中的漏洞"。在 "理想的榜样 "主题中,几位受访者认为,港中大的质保框架是确保和提高高等教育质量的一个全面而充分的模式。与此相反,"模式中的漏洞 "主题突出了大多数受访者的担忧。这项研究增进了人们对巴基斯坦高等教育质量保证动态的了解。本研究从多个角度展示了确保和提高高等教育质量所面临的挑战。解决这些问题,创建一个动态的、适应性强的、与文化相关的质量保障体系,对于巴基斯坦高等教育的发展至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficiency of HEC's Quality Assurance Agency's (QAA) Framework: Perceptions of Quality Enhancement Cells' (QECs) Executives of Pakistani Universities
This qualitative study examined Pakistani Quality Enhancement Cell (QEC) executives' views on the HEC's Quality Assurance and Agency (QAA) framework's effectiveness in higher education. Thematic analysis was used to discover and analyse QEC executives' various viewpoints on the HEC's QAA framework's efficacy using in-depth interviews with 20 purposive sampled participants. Analysis revealed two themes: "Ideal Role Model" and "Loopholes in the Model." Within the "Ideal Role Model" subject, several interviewees saw the HEC's QAA framework as a thorough and adequate model for ensuring and improving higher education quality. In contrast, the "Loop Holes in the Model" topic highlighted most respondents' concerns. This research enhances the knowledge of Pakistan's higher education quality assurance dynamics. This research shows the challenges of ensuring and improving higher education quality from many viewpoints. Addressing these viewpoints and creating a dynamic, adaptive, and culturally relevant quality assurance system are essential for Pakistan's higher education growth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信