{"title":"比较腹横肌平面阻滞与伤口浸润对腹部手术术后疼痛治疗的镇痛效果:系统性综述","authors":"Amit Patil, A. Patel, B. Pande","doi":"10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_130_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the surgical treatment, local anesthetic wound infiltration (WI) and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block are both utilized to relieve pain after abdominal surgery. To identify the most effective analgesic method, we conducted this systematic review. We extensively examined the literature for studies contrasting TAP block with WI after abdominal surgery. We performed the systematic review using online datasets such as Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and Scopus. There was a set of exclusion and inclusion criteria, including randomized controlled trials that studied comparison between TAP and local anesthetic WI. At 2 postoperative hours, there was a significant difference in the pain intensity during rest between WI and TAP block. TAP block significantly reduced pain scores compared to WI throughout rest and movements at 12 and 24 h. Patients who had a TAP block had considerably lower postoperative morphine use and postoperative nausea and vomiting occurrence. In patients undergoing abdominal surgery, there are moderate-to-high-level indications that the TAP block offers superior analgesia versus WI.","PeriodicalId":8691,"journal":{"name":"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"114 1","pages":"128 - 134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block versus wound infiltration for postoperative pain management in abdominal surgery: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Amit Patil, A. Patel, B. Pande\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_130_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the surgical treatment, local anesthetic wound infiltration (WI) and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block are both utilized to relieve pain after abdominal surgery. To identify the most effective analgesic method, we conducted this systematic review. We extensively examined the literature for studies contrasting TAP block with WI after abdominal surgery. We performed the systematic review using online datasets such as Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and Scopus. There was a set of exclusion and inclusion criteria, including randomized controlled trials that studied comparison between TAP and local anesthetic WI. At 2 postoperative hours, there was a significant difference in the pain intensity during rest between WI and TAP block. TAP block significantly reduced pain scores compared to WI throughout rest and movements at 12 and 24 h. Patients who had a TAP block had considerably lower postoperative morphine use and postoperative nausea and vomiting occurrence. In patients undergoing abdominal surgery, there are moderate-to-high-level indications that the TAP block offers superior analgesia versus WI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"114 1\",\"pages\":\"128 - 134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_130_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_130_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在手术治疗过程中,局部麻醉伤口浸润(WI)和腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞都可用于缓解腹部手术后的疼痛。为了确定最有效的镇痛方法,我们进行了此次系统性回顾。我们广泛查阅了腹部手术后 TAP 阻滞与 WI 的对比研究文献。我们利用在线数据集(如 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、PubMed 和 Scopus)进行了系统性回顾。我们制定了一套排除和纳入标准,包括研究 TAP 与局麻药 WI 比较的随机对照试验。术后 2 小时,WI 和 TAP 阻滞在休息时的疼痛强度有显著差异。在术后 12 小时和 24 小时,TAP 阻滞与 WI 相比,能明显降低患者在休息和运动时的疼痛评分。在腹部手术患者中,有中度至高度迹象表明 TAP 阻滞的镇痛效果优于 WI。
Comparing the analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block versus wound infiltration for postoperative pain management in abdominal surgery: A systematic review
During the surgical treatment, local anesthetic wound infiltration (WI) and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block are both utilized to relieve pain after abdominal surgery. To identify the most effective analgesic method, we conducted this systematic review. We extensively examined the literature for studies contrasting TAP block with WI after abdominal surgery. We performed the systematic review using online datasets such as Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and Scopus. There was a set of exclusion and inclusion criteria, including randomized controlled trials that studied comparison between TAP and local anesthetic WI. At 2 postoperative hours, there was a significant difference in the pain intensity during rest between WI and TAP block. TAP block significantly reduced pain scores compared to WI throughout rest and movements at 12 and 24 h. Patients who had a TAP block had considerably lower postoperative morphine use and postoperative nausea and vomiting occurrence. In patients undergoing abdominal surgery, there are moderate-to-high-level indications that the TAP block offers superior analgesia versus WI.