{"title":"通过三维有限元分析评估用陶瓷嵌体和镶体修复的上颌第一前磨牙的应力:体外研究","authors":"Y. Pallavi Reddy, V. Suryakumari, S. Yadav","doi":"10.4103/jioh.jioh_255_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The present study evaluated the effect of different cavity configurations on stresses generated in maxillary first premolars restored with ceramic inlays and onlays using a finite element analysis (FEA). Materials and Methods: An extracted maxillary first premolar was used to generate a 3D FEA model from which three FEA models were designed for inlay designated as Group A and two FEA models for onlay designated as Group B. Further, based on the cavity design, they were subdivided into A1—mesio-occlusal, A2—disto-occlusal cavity, A3—mesio-occlusal distal cavity, and B1—conventional onlay preparation, B2—conservative onlay preparation. Leucite and lithium disilicate ceramics were the materials tested. An axial load of 200 N was applied vertically on the Occlusal surface. A static FEA was performed to analyze the stresses generated. Outputs of minimal principal stresses (MPS-compressive) on enamel, maximum von Misses stress values in MPa in dentin, and restoration were recorded and tabulated. Results: MPS recorded in enamel were in the order GrA3 > GrA2 > Gr B1 > GrB2 >GrA1. The von Mises stresses generated in dentin were highest for GrA2 (65.4 MPa), followed by Groups A3, A1, B2, and B1 (24.5MPa). The ceramic materials evaluated did not significantly influence the stresses. Conclusion: None of the cavity designs or the materials tested resulted in deleterious stresses leading to failure. Inlays and onlays prove to be reinforcing restorations in maxillary first premolars, with onlays having an embracing effect on the remaining sound tooth structure.","PeriodicalId":16138,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Oral Health","volume":"35 1","pages":"391 - 397"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of stresses in maxillary first premolar restored with ceramic inlays and onlays by 3D finite element analysis: An in vitro study\",\"authors\":\"Y. Pallavi Reddy, V. Suryakumari, S. Yadav\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jioh.jioh_255_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The present study evaluated the effect of different cavity configurations on stresses generated in maxillary first premolars restored with ceramic inlays and onlays using a finite element analysis (FEA). Materials and Methods: An extracted maxillary first premolar was used to generate a 3D FEA model from which three FEA models were designed for inlay designated as Group A and two FEA models for onlay designated as Group B. Further, based on the cavity design, they were subdivided into A1—mesio-occlusal, A2—disto-occlusal cavity, A3—mesio-occlusal distal cavity, and B1—conventional onlay preparation, B2—conservative onlay preparation. Leucite and lithium disilicate ceramics were the materials tested. An axial load of 200 N was applied vertically on the Occlusal surface. A static FEA was performed to analyze the stresses generated. Outputs of minimal principal stresses (MPS-compressive) on enamel, maximum von Misses stress values in MPa in dentin, and restoration were recorded and tabulated. Results: MPS recorded in enamel were in the order GrA3 > GrA2 > Gr B1 > GrB2 >GrA1. The von Mises stresses generated in dentin were highest for GrA2 (65.4 MPa), followed by Groups A3, A1, B2, and B1 (24.5MPa). The ceramic materials evaluated did not significantly influence the stresses. Conclusion: None of the cavity designs or the materials tested resulted in deleterious stresses leading to failure. Inlays and onlays prove to be reinforcing restorations in maxillary first premolars, with onlays having an embracing effect on the remaining sound tooth structure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Oral Health\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"391 - 397\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Oral Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jioh.jioh_255_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jioh.jioh_255_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究使用有限元分析(FEA)评估了不同牙洞结构对使用陶瓷嵌体和镶体修复的上颌第一前磨牙所产生应力的影响。材料和方法:使用一颗拔出的上颌第一前磨牙生成三维有限元分析模型,根据该模型设计出三个有限元分析模型,嵌体称为 A 组,两个有限元分析模型称为 B 组。此外,根据牙洞的设计,它们又被细分为 A1-介质-咬合面牙洞、A2-远端-咬合面牙洞、A3-介质-咬合面远端牙洞,以及 B1-常规镶嵌体制备法、B2-保守镶嵌体制备法。测试材料为白云石和二硅酸锂陶瓷。在咬合面上垂直施加 200 N 的轴向负荷。进行静态有限元分析以分析产生的应力。珐琅质上的最小主应力(MPS-压缩)、牙本质上以兆帕为单位的最大 von Misses 应力值以及修复体的输出均已记录并列表。结果:在珐琅质中记录的最小主应力依次为 GrA3 > GrA2 > Gr B1 > GrB2 > GrA1。牙本质中产生的冯米塞斯应力最高的是 GrA2(65.4 兆帕),其次是 A3、A1、B2 和 B1 组(24.5 兆帕)。所评估的陶瓷材料对应力没有明显影响。结论所测试的牙洞设计或材料都不会导致有害的应力,从而导致失败。事实证明,嵌体和镶体是上颌第一前磨牙的加固修复体,其中镶体对剩余的健全牙齿结构具有包容作用。
Evaluation of stresses in maxillary first premolar restored with ceramic inlays and onlays by 3D finite element analysis: An in vitro study
Aim: The present study evaluated the effect of different cavity configurations on stresses generated in maxillary first premolars restored with ceramic inlays and onlays using a finite element analysis (FEA). Materials and Methods: An extracted maxillary first premolar was used to generate a 3D FEA model from which three FEA models were designed for inlay designated as Group A and two FEA models for onlay designated as Group B. Further, based on the cavity design, they were subdivided into A1—mesio-occlusal, A2—disto-occlusal cavity, A3—mesio-occlusal distal cavity, and B1—conventional onlay preparation, B2—conservative onlay preparation. Leucite and lithium disilicate ceramics were the materials tested. An axial load of 200 N was applied vertically on the Occlusal surface. A static FEA was performed to analyze the stresses generated. Outputs of minimal principal stresses (MPS-compressive) on enamel, maximum von Misses stress values in MPa in dentin, and restoration were recorded and tabulated. Results: MPS recorded in enamel were in the order GrA3 > GrA2 > Gr B1 > GrB2 >GrA1. The von Mises stresses generated in dentin were highest for GrA2 (65.4 MPa), followed by Groups A3, A1, B2, and B1 (24.5MPa). The ceramic materials evaluated did not significantly influence the stresses. Conclusion: None of the cavity designs or the materials tested resulted in deleterious stresses leading to failure. Inlays and onlays prove to be reinforcing restorations in maxillary first premolars, with onlays having an embracing effect on the remaining sound tooth structure.
期刊介绍:
It is a journal aimed for research, scientific facts and details covering all specialties of dentistry with a good determination for exploring and sharing the knowledge in the medical and dental fraternity. The scope is therefore huge covering almost all streams of dentistry - starting from original studies, systematic reviews, narrative reviews, very unique case reports. Our journal appreciates research articles pertaining with advancement of dentistry. Journal scope is not limited to these subjects and is more wider covering all specialities of dentistry follows: Preventive and Community Dentistry (Dental Public Health) Endodontics Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (also called Oral Surgery) Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics Periodontology (also called Periodontics) Pediatric Dentistry (also called Pedodontics) Prosthodontics (also called Prosthetic Dentistry) Oral Medicine Special Needs Dentistry (also called Special Care Dentistry) Oral Biology Forensic Odontology Geriatric Dentistry or Geriodontics Implantology Laser and Aesthetic Dentistry.