哈依里特山小学的跨语言写作重新语言化

Lara-Stephanie Krause-Alzaidi
{"title":"哈依里特山小学的跨语言写作重新语言化","authors":"Lara-Stephanie Krause-Alzaidi","doi":"10.1080/15427587.2023.2258242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Linguistic heterogeneity and fluidity – prominently captured in the notion of ‘translanguaging’– are starting to be seen as normative and natural. In turn, homogeneity and fixity, instantiated for example in standard languages, are becoming the ‘odd-ones-out.’ I challenge the dichotomy between linguistic fluidity (languaging) and fixity (named languages), in a situated conceptual account of translingual writing practices in English classrooms in a Khayelitshan primary school. These spaces fold the linguistic fluidity typical of South African townships, and the fixity of two standard languages, into one complex spatial repertoire. Operationalizing this spatial perspective, I suggest that students are constantly engaged in relanguaging, recursively sorting out the classroom repertoire according to the various linguistic norms enfolded in the space, and of bringing together linguistic resources in various combinations. Relanguaging systematically unsettles the dichotomy between fluid languaging and fix institutional language norms retained in dominant conceptualizations of translanguaging. This way it opens up new conceptual and analytical perspectives with possible pedagogical implication for writing instruction and testing. Standard English could, for example, be assessed beyond its own confines, using writing tasks that can make visible increasingly sophisticated linguistic sorting skills as students.","PeriodicalId":53706,"journal":{"name":"Critical Inquiry in Language Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relanguaging translingual writing in a Khayelitshan primary school\",\"authors\":\"Lara-Stephanie Krause-Alzaidi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15427587.2023.2258242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Linguistic heterogeneity and fluidity – prominently captured in the notion of ‘translanguaging’– are starting to be seen as normative and natural. In turn, homogeneity and fixity, instantiated for example in standard languages, are becoming the ‘odd-ones-out.’ I challenge the dichotomy between linguistic fluidity (languaging) and fixity (named languages), in a situated conceptual account of translingual writing practices in English classrooms in a Khayelitshan primary school. These spaces fold the linguistic fluidity typical of South African townships, and the fixity of two standard languages, into one complex spatial repertoire. Operationalizing this spatial perspective, I suggest that students are constantly engaged in relanguaging, recursively sorting out the classroom repertoire according to the various linguistic norms enfolded in the space, and of bringing together linguistic resources in various combinations. Relanguaging systematically unsettles the dichotomy between fluid languaging and fix institutional language norms retained in dominant conceptualizations of translanguaging. This way it opens up new conceptual and analytical perspectives with possible pedagogical implication for writing instruction and testing. Standard English could, for example, be assessed beyond its own confines, using writing tasks that can make visible increasingly sophisticated linguistic sorting skills as students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Inquiry in Language Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Inquiry in Language Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2023.2258242\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Inquiry in Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2023.2258242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ABSTRACT 语言的异质性和流动性--"翻译语言 "这一概念的突出体现--开始被视为规范和自然。反过来,标准语言中的同质性和固定性正在成为 "异类"。我通过对 Khayelitshan 小学英语课堂中的跨语言写作实践的情景概念描述,对语言流动性(语言活动)和固定性(命名语言)之间的二分法提出了质疑。这些空间将南非乡镇典型的语言流动性和两种标准语言的固定性融合为一个复杂的空间剧目。从这一空间视角出发,我认为学生们一直在进行语言再创造,根据空间所包含的各种语言规范反复整理课堂曲目,并以各种组合方式汇集语言资源。再语言化 "系统地打破了 "流动语言化 "和 "固定体制语言规范 "之间的二分法,这种二分法保留在主流的 "语言转换 "概念中。这样,它就开辟了新的概念和分析视角,可能对写作教学和测试产生教学影响。例如,对标准英语的评估可以超越其自身的局限,使用写作任务,使学生的语言分类技能日益复杂化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relanguaging translingual writing in a Khayelitshan primary school
ABSTRACT Linguistic heterogeneity and fluidity – prominently captured in the notion of ‘translanguaging’– are starting to be seen as normative and natural. In turn, homogeneity and fixity, instantiated for example in standard languages, are becoming the ‘odd-ones-out.’ I challenge the dichotomy between linguistic fluidity (languaging) and fixity (named languages), in a situated conceptual account of translingual writing practices in English classrooms in a Khayelitshan primary school. These spaces fold the linguistic fluidity typical of South African townships, and the fixity of two standard languages, into one complex spatial repertoire. Operationalizing this spatial perspective, I suggest that students are constantly engaged in relanguaging, recursively sorting out the classroom repertoire according to the various linguistic norms enfolded in the space, and of bringing together linguistic resources in various combinations. Relanguaging systematically unsettles the dichotomy between fluid languaging and fix institutional language norms retained in dominant conceptualizations of translanguaging. This way it opens up new conceptual and analytical perspectives with possible pedagogical implication for writing instruction and testing. Standard English could, for example, be assessed beyond its own confines, using writing tasks that can make visible increasingly sophisticated linguistic sorting skills as students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Inquiry in Language Studies
Critical Inquiry in Language Studies Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信