安乐死与信仰养老机构:不杀人的权利?

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Seumas Miller, Virginia Miller
{"title":"安乐死与信仰养老机构:不杀人的权利?","authors":"Seumas Miller, Virginia Miller","doi":"10.1080/23753234.2023.2249513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this paper we focus on an important specific issue which has not received serious attention in the scholarly literature on euthanasia, namely, that of the coercive imposition (by way of sanction-backed regulations) of the practice of voluntary active euthanasia (in particular) on faith-based, aged-care organizations. In Section 1 we outline the relevant conceptual background drawing on existing literature. In Section 2, we consider two conflicting ethical standpoints on voluntary active euthanasia. In Section 3 we outline the nature and extent of the push to impose the practice of voluntary active euthanasia on Catholic-run aged-care organizations. In Section 4 we argue that the argument for coercively imposing the practice of voluntary active euthanasia on faith-based, aged-care organizations, is not well-made, especially in the context of liberal democracies committed to pluralism.","PeriodicalId":36858,"journal":{"name":"Church, Communication and Culture","volume":"4 1","pages":"248 - 266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Euthanasia and faith-based aged-care organisations: The right not to kill?\",\"authors\":\"Seumas Miller, Virginia Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23753234.2023.2249513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this paper we focus on an important specific issue which has not received serious attention in the scholarly literature on euthanasia, namely, that of the coercive imposition (by way of sanction-backed regulations) of the practice of voluntary active euthanasia (in particular) on faith-based, aged-care organizations. In Section 1 we outline the relevant conceptual background drawing on existing literature. In Section 2, we consider two conflicting ethical standpoints on voluntary active euthanasia. In Section 3 we outline the nature and extent of the push to impose the practice of voluntary active euthanasia on Catholic-run aged-care organizations. In Section 4 we argue that the argument for coercively imposing the practice of voluntary active euthanasia on faith-based, aged-care organizations, is not well-made, especially in the context of liberal democracies committed to pluralism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Church, Communication and Culture\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"248 - 266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Church, Communication and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2023.2249513\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Church, Communication and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2023.2249513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 在本文中,我们将重点关注一个重要的具体问题,这个问题在有关安乐死的学术文献中并没有得到认真的关注,即以信仰为基础的老年护理组织对自愿主动安乐死做法(尤其是)的强制实施(通过制裁支持的法规)。在第 1 节中,我们借鉴现有文献,概述了相关的概念背景。在第 2 部分中,我们考虑了关于自愿主动安乐死的两种相互冲突的伦理观点。在第 3 节中,我们概述了将自愿主动安乐死的做法强加给天主教经营的老年护理机构的性质和程度。在第 4 节中,我们认为将自愿主动安乐死的做法强制强加给以信仰为基础的老年护理组织的论据并不充分,尤其是在致力于多元化的自由民主国家的背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Euthanasia and faith-based aged-care organisations: The right not to kill?
Abstract In this paper we focus on an important specific issue which has not received serious attention in the scholarly literature on euthanasia, namely, that of the coercive imposition (by way of sanction-backed regulations) of the practice of voluntary active euthanasia (in particular) on faith-based, aged-care organizations. In Section 1 we outline the relevant conceptual background drawing on existing literature. In Section 2, we consider two conflicting ethical standpoints on voluntary active euthanasia. In Section 3 we outline the nature and extent of the push to impose the practice of voluntary active euthanasia on Catholic-run aged-care organizations. In Section 4 we argue that the argument for coercively imposing the practice of voluntary active euthanasia on faith-based, aged-care organizations, is not well-made, especially in the context of liberal democracies committed to pluralism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Church, Communication and Culture
Church, Communication and Culture Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信