图像/文本/陈词滥调/洞察力:全球艺术界的类比实践

IF 0.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Cheetham, Hana Nikčević
{"title":"图像/文本/陈词滥调/洞察力:全球艺术界的类比实践","authors":"M. Cheetham, Hana Nikčević","doi":"10.1080/02666286.2023.2195808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The special issue Analogical Practices in the Global Art World systematically examines for the first time the widespread practice of constructing global art and architectural histories through analogy. In addition to summarizing the essays presented and the pertinent literature on analogy across several fields, this Introduction marshals primary research alongside scholarship and observations from diverse disciplines to advance two overarching arguments. First, we claim that art world analogies both disclose and influence the axes along which art-historical and museological thinking is habitually oriented: national groupings or “schools” above all, but also chronology, gender, race, cultural identification, art media, and style. Second, we argue that the art world analogy paradigmatically involves collaborations of textual iteration with works of visual art. Proposing, ultimately, that visual analogy is never just visual, we build a theory of analogy-as-discourse for the visual arts.","PeriodicalId":44046,"journal":{"name":"WORD & IMAGE","volume":"48 1","pages":"283 - 290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Image/text/cliché/insight: analogical practices in the global art world\",\"authors\":\"M. Cheetham, Hana Nikčević\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02666286.2023.2195808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The special issue Analogical Practices in the Global Art World systematically examines for the first time the widespread practice of constructing global art and architectural histories through analogy. In addition to summarizing the essays presented and the pertinent literature on analogy across several fields, this Introduction marshals primary research alongside scholarship and observations from diverse disciplines to advance two overarching arguments. First, we claim that art world analogies both disclose and influence the axes along which art-historical and museological thinking is habitually oriented: national groupings or “schools” above all, but also chronology, gender, race, cultural identification, art media, and style. Second, we argue that the art world analogy paradigmatically involves collaborations of textual iteration with works of visual art. Proposing, ultimately, that visual analogy is never just visual, we build a theory of analogy-as-discourse for the visual arts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WORD & IMAGE\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"283 - 290\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WORD & IMAGE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02666286.2023.2195808\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WORD & IMAGE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02666286.2023.2195808","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 特刊《全球艺术界的类比实践》首次系统地研究了通过类比构建全球艺术史和建筑史的普遍做法。本导言除了总结所介绍的文章和多个领域中关于类比的相关文献外,还将主要研究成果与来自不同学科的学术研究和观察结果结合起来,提出两个重要论点。首先,我们认为艺术世界的类比揭示并影响了艺术史和博物馆学思维惯常的轴心:首先是国家集团或 "流派",其次是年代、性别、种族、文化认同、艺术媒介和风格。其次,我们认为艺术世界的类比范式涉及文本迭代与视觉艺术作品的合作。最终,我们提出视觉类比绝不仅仅是视觉类比,并为视觉艺术建立了一种类比即话语的理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Image/text/cliché/insight: analogical practices in the global art world
Abstract The special issue Analogical Practices in the Global Art World systematically examines for the first time the widespread practice of constructing global art and architectural histories through analogy. In addition to summarizing the essays presented and the pertinent literature on analogy across several fields, this Introduction marshals primary research alongside scholarship and observations from diverse disciplines to advance two overarching arguments. First, we claim that art world analogies both disclose and influence the axes along which art-historical and museological thinking is habitually oriented: national groupings or “schools” above all, but also chronology, gender, race, cultural identification, art media, and style. Second, we argue that the art world analogy paradigmatically involves collaborations of textual iteration with works of visual art. Proposing, ultimately, that visual analogy is never just visual, we build a theory of analogy-as-discourse for the visual arts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
WORD & IMAGE
WORD & IMAGE HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
33.30%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Word & Image concerns itself with the study of the encounters, dialogues and mutual collaboration (or hostility) between verbal and visual languages, one of the prime areas of humanistic criticism. Word & Image provides a forum for articles that focus exclusively on this special study of the relations between words and images. Themed issues are considered occasionally on their merits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信