两种不同强度利伐沙班的生物等效性研究:墨西哥健康受试者在空腹条件下服用 10 毫克利伐沙班和在进食条件下服用 20 毫克利伐沙班的生物等效性研究

González-de la Parra M
{"title":"两种不同强度利伐沙班的生物等效性研究:墨西哥健康受试者在空腹条件下服用 10 毫克利伐沙班和在进食条件下服用 20 毫克利伐沙班的生物等效性研究","authors":"González-de la Parra M","doi":"10.23880/beba-16000207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of these two studies was to evaluate the bioequivalence of two strengths of rivaroxaban 10 mg and 20 mg. Because the food effect on the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban affects the strength of 20 mg and not that of 10 mg. The 20 mg strength study was conducted under fed conditions, whereas the 10 mg strength study was conducted under fasting conditions. The two studies were conducted separately with different sets of Mexican subjects of both genders using a randomized, singledose, 2-sequence, 2-period cross over design with a 7-day washout period. Blood samples from the subjects were obtained at basal conditions, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00, 1.25, 1.50, 1.75, 2.00, 2.50, 3.00, 3.50, 4.00, 6.00, 8.00, 10.00, 12.00, 24.00, 36.00 and 48.00 hours after administration. Rivaroxaban plasma concentrations were quantified using an HPLC method coupled to a mass spectrometer. The test and reference formulations were considered to be bioequivalent if the 90% CI for the ratios (test/reference) of geometric means were within the acceptance limits of 80 to 125% for the pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC0–t and AUC0–∞. In both studies the 90% CI for all pharmacokinetic parameters were within the limits of acceptance. Therefore the conclusion of bioequivalence was reached.","PeriodicalId":8995,"journal":{"name":"Bioequivalence & Bioavailability International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bioequivalence Studies of Rivaroxaban at Two Different Strengths: Rivaroxaban 10 mg under Fasting Conditions and Rivaroxaban 20 mg under Fed Conditions in Healthy Mexican Subjects\",\"authors\":\"González-de la Parra M\",\"doi\":\"10.23880/beba-16000207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The goal of these two studies was to evaluate the bioequivalence of two strengths of rivaroxaban 10 mg and 20 mg. Because the food effect on the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban affects the strength of 20 mg and not that of 10 mg. The 20 mg strength study was conducted under fed conditions, whereas the 10 mg strength study was conducted under fasting conditions. The two studies were conducted separately with different sets of Mexican subjects of both genders using a randomized, singledose, 2-sequence, 2-period cross over design with a 7-day washout period. Blood samples from the subjects were obtained at basal conditions, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00, 1.25, 1.50, 1.75, 2.00, 2.50, 3.00, 3.50, 4.00, 6.00, 8.00, 10.00, 12.00, 24.00, 36.00 and 48.00 hours after administration. Rivaroxaban plasma concentrations were quantified using an HPLC method coupled to a mass spectrometer. The test and reference formulations were considered to be bioequivalent if the 90% CI for the ratios (test/reference) of geometric means were within the acceptance limits of 80 to 125% for the pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC0–t and AUC0–∞. In both studies the 90% CI for all pharmacokinetic parameters were within the limits of acceptance. Therefore the conclusion of bioequivalence was reached.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioequivalence & Bioavailability International Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioequivalence & Bioavailability International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23880/beba-16000207\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioequivalence & Bioavailability International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/beba-16000207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这两项研究的目的是评估 10 毫克和 20 毫克两种强度的利伐沙班的生物等效性。因为食物对利伐沙班药代动力学的影响只影响 20 毫克的强度,而不影响 10 毫克的强度。20 毫克强度研究是在进食条件下进行的,而 10 毫克强度研究是在空腹条件下进行的。这两项研究分别在不同组别的墨西哥男女受试者中进行,采用随机、单剂量、2序列、2周期交叉设计,并有7天的冲洗期。受试者的血样分别在基础状态、用药后 0.25、0.50、0.75、1.00、1.25、1.50、1.75、2.00、2.50、3.00、3.50、4.00、6.00、8.00、10.00、12.00、24.00、36.00 和 48.00 小时采集。利伐沙班的血浆浓度采用与质谱仪联用的高效液相色谱法进行定量。如果药代动力学参数 Cmax、AUC0-t 和 AUC0-∞ 的几何平均比(试验/参照)的 90% CI 在 80% 至 125% 的接受范围内,则认为试验制剂和参照制剂具有生物等效性。在这两项研究中,所有药代动力学参数的 90% CI 均在接受范围内。因此得出了生物等效性的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bioequivalence Studies of Rivaroxaban at Two Different Strengths: Rivaroxaban 10 mg under Fasting Conditions and Rivaroxaban 20 mg under Fed Conditions in Healthy Mexican Subjects
The goal of these two studies was to evaluate the bioequivalence of two strengths of rivaroxaban 10 mg and 20 mg. Because the food effect on the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban affects the strength of 20 mg and not that of 10 mg. The 20 mg strength study was conducted under fed conditions, whereas the 10 mg strength study was conducted under fasting conditions. The two studies were conducted separately with different sets of Mexican subjects of both genders using a randomized, singledose, 2-sequence, 2-period cross over design with a 7-day washout period. Blood samples from the subjects were obtained at basal conditions, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00, 1.25, 1.50, 1.75, 2.00, 2.50, 3.00, 3.50, 4.00, 6.00, 8.00, 10.00, 12.00, 24.00, 36.00 and 48.00 hours after administration. Rivaroxaban plasma concentrations were quantified using an HPLC method coupled to a mass spectrometer. The test and reference formulations were considered to be bioequivalent if the 90% CI for the ratios (test/reference) of geometric means were within the acceptance limits of 80 to 125% for the pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC0–t and AUC0–∞. In both studies the 90% CI for all pharmacokinetic parameters were within the limits of acceptance. Therefore the conclusion of bioequivalence was reached.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信