主观幸福政策:印度尼西亚日惹特区的案例研究及其相关性

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
S. Aripin, A.C. Pierewan, S.S. Susanti, I.P.P. Salmon
{"title":"主观幸福政策:印度尼西亚日惹特区的案例研究及其相关性","authors":"S. Aripin, A.C. Pierewan, S.S. Susanti, I.P.P. Salmon","doi":"10.17759/sps.2023140210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. This study aims to examine the implementation and optimization of subjective well-being as a constituent of policymaking. Background. Subjective well-being, frequently considered in policymaking, has not been widely used and optimally implemented in Indonesia. Most of the policymaking processes only consider economic indicators and ignore immaterial aspects. Study design. This study employed a qualitative and case study approach. It involves the Statistics Indonesia and the Provincial Government of the Special Region of Yogyakarta as the data collection bases. In addition, it investigated the policy implementation and the factual application of subjective well-being.Measurements. The researchers collected the data through interviews, documentation, and focus group discussion. All the data were validated through triangulation. Result. The issue of happiness is rarely highlighted in policymaking. In fact, happiness is a component that is able to meet the psychological and spiritual needs of society. At the same time, this is supported by the existence of a GDP indicator that does not really represent the welfare of a region, and even is able to control people's satisfaction through policymaking. The Special Region of Yogyakarta is one of the areas that is suitable for pilots in implementing the issue of happiness in policymaking, although in practice there are still variables that are not in line with the planning process document. This pilot pays attention to immaterial supporting elements such as policymaker agreements, social inclusivity, cultural capital, and social capital. The Special Region of Yogyakarta, which has also implemented considerations on the issue of happiness, has shown positive significance in the aspects of people's lives. Conclusions. This study concludes that the variables on the happiness index are not affiliated with several planning documents in the Province of the Special Region of Yogyakarta. Therefore, studies regarding the happiness aspect, for example, welcoming inclusiveness in the Special Region of Yogyakarta, are essential. In addition, the cultural aspect, especially the society’s acceptance of material aspects (life satisfaction), has contributed to the establishment of subjective well-being in the province. This study recommends further study of obstacles in applying the happiness index and subjective well-being in policy formulation.","PeriodicalId":54079,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Subjective Well-being Policy: Case Studies and Its Relevance in the Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"S. Aripin, A.C. Pierewan, S.S. Susanti, I.P.P. Salmon\",\"doi\":\"10.17759/sps.2023140210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective. This study aims to examine the implementation and optimization of subjective well-being as a constituent of policymaking. Background. Subjective well-being, frequently considered in policymaking, has not been widely used and optimally implemented in Indonesia. Most of the policymaking processes only consider economic indicators and ignore immaterial aspects. Study design. This study employed a qualitative and case study approach. It involves the Statistics Indonesia and the Provincial Government of the Special Region of Yogyakarta as the data collection bases. In addition, it investigated the policy implementation and the factual application of subjective well-being.Measurements. The researchers collected the data through interviews, documentation, and focus group discussion. All the data were validated through triangulation. Result. The issue of happiness is rarely highlighted in policymaking. In fact, happiness is a component that is able to meet the psychological and spiritual needs of society. At the same time, this is supported by the existence of a GDP indicator that does not really represent the welfare of a region, and even is able to control people's satisfaction through policymaking. The Special Region of Yogyakarta is one of the areas that is suitable for pilots in implementing the issue of happiness in policymaking, although in practice there are still variables that are not in line with the planning process document. This pilot pays attention to immaterial supporting elements such as policymaker agreements, social inclusivity, cultural capital, and social capital. The Special Region of Yogyakarta, which has also implemented considerations on the issue of happiness, has shown positive significance in the aspects of people's lives. Conclusions. This study concludes that the variables on the happiness index are not affiliated with several planning documents in the Province of the Special Region of Yogyakarta. Therefore, studies regarding the happiness aspect, for example, welcoming inclusiveness in the Special Region of Yogyakarta, are essential. In addition, the cultural aspect, especially the society’s acceptance of material aspects (life satisfaction), has contributed to the establishment of subjective well-being in the province. This study recommends further study of obstacles in applying the happiness index and subjective well-being in policy formulation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Psychology and Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Psychology and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2023140210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2023140210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在探讨作为决策组成部分的主观幸福感的实施和优化问题。背景。主观幸福感是决策过程中经常考虑的因素,但在印度尼西亚尚未得到广泛应用和优化实施。大多数决策过程只考虑经济指标,而忽略了非物质方面。研究设计。本研究采用了定性和案例研究方法。它以印尼统计局和日惹特区省政府为数据收集基础。此外,本研究还调查了主观幸福感的政策实施和实际应用情况。研究人员通过访谈、文献和焦点小组讨论收集数据。所有数据均通过三角测量法进行验证。研究结果幸福问题很少在决策中得到强调。事实上,幸福是能够满足社会心理和精神需求的一个组成部分。同时,GDP 指标的存在也佐证了这一点,它并不能真正代表一个地区的福利,甚至能够通过政策制定来控制人们的满意度。日惹特区是适合在决策中实施幸福问题试点的地区之一,尽管在实践中仍存在与规划程序文件不一致的变量。该试点关注非物质支持要素,如决策者协议、社会包容性、文化资本和社会资本。日惹特区也实施了对幸福问题的考虑,在人民生活的各个方面都显示出积极意义。结论本研究得出结论,幸福指数的变量与日惹特区省的一些规划文件无关。因此,有必要对幸福感方面进行研究,例如日惹特区的包容性。此外,文化方面,特别是社会对物质方面(生活满意度)的接受程度,也有助于在该省建立主观幸福感。本研究建议进一步研究在政策制定中应用幸福指数和主观幸福感的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Subjective Well-being Policy: Case Studies and Its Relevance in the Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Objective. This study aims to examine the implementation and optimization of subjective well-being as a constituent of policymaking. Background. Subjective well-being, frequently considered in policymaking, has not been widely used and optimally implemented in Indonesia. Most of the policymaking processes only consider economic indicators and ignore immaterial aspects. Study design. This study employed a qualitative and case study approach. It involves the Statistics Indonesia and the Provincial Government of the Special Region of Yogyakarta as the data collection bases. In addition, it investigated the policy implementation and the factual application of subjective well-being.Measurements. The researchers collected the data through interviews, documentation, and focus group discussion. All the data were validated through triangulation. Result. The issue of happiness is rarely highlighted in policymaking. In fact, happiness is a component that is able to meet the psychological and spiritual needs of society. At the same time, this is supported by the existence of a GDP indicator that does not really represent the welfare of a region, and even is able to control people's satisfaction through policymaking. The Special Region of Yogyakarta is one of the areas that is suitable for pilots in implementing the issue of happiness in policymaking, although in practice there are still variables that are not in line with the planning process document. This pilot pays attention to immaterial supporting elements such as policymaker agreements, social inclusivity, cultural capital, and social capital. The Special Region of Yogyakarta, which has also implemented considerations on the issue of happiness, has shown positive significance in the aspects of people's lives. Conclusions. This study concludes that the variables on the happiness index are not affiliated with several planning documents in the Province of the Special Region of Yogyakarta. Therefore, studies regarding the happiness aspect, for example, welcoming inclusiveness in the Special Region of Yogyakarta, are essential. In addition, the cultural aspect, especially the society’s acceptance of material aspects (life satisfaction), has contributed to the establishment of subjective well-being in the province. This study recommends further study of obstacles in applying the happiness index and subjective well-being in policy formulation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Psychology and Society
Social Psychology and Society PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信