国有企业在不控制人民生活的生产部门经济活动中的责任

Syadzwina Hindun Nabila
{"title":"国有企业在不控制人民生活的生产部门经济活动中的责任","authors":"Syadzwina Hindun Nabila","doi":"10.47268/kanjoli.v1i1.9805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analysuing the position of monopoly State-Owned Enterprises in the perspective of business competition law which could potentially give rise to barriers in business competition in particular concerning control over production branches are considered important and master his life much. Though it is excluded in law number 5 of 1999 concerning the prohibition of Monopolies and Anticompetitive Business practices are unhealthy, but that should not be considered a monopoly owned by the State-Owned Enterprises at the same time have the power over the market, and all the power over its own market not obliging him to carry on the practice of healthy competition. Existence of State-Owned Enterprises in the perspective of business competition law is the implementation of Article 33 of the Constitution of 1945, where the presence of the NRI Soes is a manifestation of the State's role in the national economy for the well-being of the people. The position of monopoly State-Owned Eterprises in the perspective of business competition law is still frequently abused the rights relating to the control of the State giving rise to unhealthy business competition. A monopoly held by State-Owned Enterprises should be stabilised so that serves as the market competition can run healthy. Criteria for State-Owned Enterprises can be given a monopoly in business competition law perspective, just look at the functions and Government intervention in the economy aimed at the earliest possible time the prosperity of the people. Criteria for State-Owned Enterprises can be given a monopoly should be seen from the form and objectives of the establishment of State-Owned Enterprises as well as the magnitude of the ownership of the Government's stake in it.","PeriodicalId":504323,"journal":{"name":"KANJOLI Business Law Review","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tanggung Jawab Badan Usaha Milik Negara Dalam Kegiatan Ekonomi Pada Cabang-Cabang Produksi Yang Tidak Menguasai Hajat Hidup Orang Banyak\",\"authors\":\"Syadzwina Hindun Nabila\",\"doi\":\"10.47268/kanjoli.v1i1.9805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Analysuing the position of monopoly State-Owned Enterprises in the perspective of business competition law which could potentially give rise to barriers in business competition in particular concerning control over production branches are considered important and master his life much. Though it is excluded in law number 5 of 1999 concerning the prohibition of Monopolies and Anticompetitive Business practices are unhealthy, but that should not be considered a monopoly owned by the State-Owned Enterprises at the same time have the power over the market, and all the power over its own market not obliging him to carry on the practice of healthy competition. Existence of State-Owned Enterprises in the perspective of business competition law is the implementation of Article 33 of the Constitution of 1945, where the presence of the NRI Soes is a manifestation of the State's role in the national economy for the well-being of the people. The position of monopoly State-Owned Eterprises in the perspective of business competition law is still frequently abused the rights relating to the control of the State giving rise to unhealthy business competition. A monopoly held by State-Owned Enterprises should be stabilised so that serves as the market competition can run healthy. Criteria for State-Owned Enterprises can be given a monopoly in business competition law perspective, just look at the functions and Government intervention in the economy aimed at the earliest possible time the prosperity of the people. Criteria for State-Owned Enterprises can be given a monopoly should be seen from the form and objectives of the establishment of State-Owned Enterprises as well as the magnitude of the ownership of the Government's stake in it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KANJOLI Business Law Review\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KANJOLI Business Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47268/kanjoli.v1i1.9805\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KANJOLI Business Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47268/kanjoli.v1i1.9805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从商业竞争法的角度分析垄断性国有企业的地位,这可能会在商业竞争中造成障碍,特别是在对生产部门的控制方面,这一点被认为是非常重要的,而且对其生活影响很大。虽然 1999 年关于禁止垄断和反竞争商业行为的第 5 号法律将其排除在外,但不应将国有企业拥有的垄断视为同时拥有对市场的控制权,以及对其自身市场的所有控制权,这并不意味着国有企业有义务进行良性竞争。从商业竞争法的角度来看,国有企业的存在是对 1945 年《宪法》第 33 条的执行,在该条中,国有企业的存在体现了国家在国民经济中为人民谋福利的作用。从商业竞争法的角度来看,垄断性国有企业的地位仍然经常被滥用,导致与国家控制有关的权利被滥用,引发恶性商业竞争。国有企业的垄断地位应予以稳定,以利于市场竞争的良性运行。从商业竞争法的角度来看,国有企业可被赋予垄断地位的标准,只需看看其职能和政府对经济的干预,目的是尽早实现人民的繁荣。国有企业能否被赋予垄断地位的标准应从国有企业的设立形式和目标以及政府在其中所占股份的大小来看。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tanggung Jawab Badan Usaha Milik Negara Dalam Kegiatan Ekonomi Pada Cabang-Cabang Produksi Yang Tidak Menguasai Hajat Hidup Orang Banyak
Analysuing the position of monopoly State-Owned Enterprises in the perspective of business competition law which could potentially give rise to barriers in business competition in particular concerning control over production branches are considered important and master his life much. Though it is excluded in law number 5 of 1999 concerning the prohibition of Monopolies and Anticompetitive Business practices are unhealthy, but that should not be considered a monopoly owned by the State-Owned Enterprises at the same time have the power over the market, and all the power over its own market not obliging him to carry on the practice of healthy competition. Existence of State-Owned Enterprises in the perspective of business competition law is the implementation of Article 33 of the Constitution of 1945, where the presence of the NRI Soes is a manifestation of the State's role in the national economy for the well-being of the people. The position of monopoly State-Owned Eterprises in the perspective of business competition law is still frequently abused the rights relating to the control of the State giving rise to unhealthy business competition. A monopoly held by State-Owned Enterprises should be stabilised so that serves as the market competition can run healthy. Criteria for State-Owned Enterprises can be given a monopoly in business competition law perspective, just look at the functions and Government intervention in the economy aimed at the earliest possible time the prosperity of the people. Criteria for State-Owned Enterprises can be given a monopoly should be seen from the form and objectives of the establishment of State-Owned Enterprises as well as the magnitude of the ownership of the Government's stake in it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信