血管内主动脉修补术失败后的晚期手术转换:我们单一机构的经验

S. Akansel
{"title":"血管内主动脉修补术失败后的晚期手术转换:我们单一机构的经验","authors":"S. Akansel","doi":"10.5606/e-cvsi.2023.1493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: In this study, we report our single-center experience with late surgical conversion (SC) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and risk factors for reintervention. Patients and methods: Between January 2007 and December 2017, a total of 98 patients (94 males, 4 females; mean age: 69.1±8.6 years; range, 35 to 86 years) who underwent infrarenal EVAR were retrospectively analyzed. During the study period, additional eight patients who underwent EVAR at an external center were referred to our center. Overall, nine patients underwent late SC. In the late SC group, stent grafts used for EVAR were Endurant™ (n=5), Talent™ (n=2), Powerlink™, and Anaconda™ (n=1). Results: The mean time from initial EVAR to open conversion was 45.3±35.4 months. Four (44.4%) patients presented with more than one different concomitant indications. The most frequent reason for the late SC was type 3 endoleak (n=5, 55.5%). Late SC was performed electively in five (55.5%) patients. Partial stent graft removal was performed in three (33.3%), complete removal in three (33.3%), and complete preservation of the stent graft in three (33.3%) patients. Among 98 patients, the mean aneurysm diameter was significantly higher in those with late complication and undergoing second EVAR (p=0.001). The cut-off value for second EVAR was ≥66 mm with a sensitivity of 88.89% and specificity of 71.91% (p=0.001). Conclusion: The surveillance program after EVAR is of utmost importance to ensure that patients do not need urgent conversion, particularly in patients with an initial aneurysm diameter of ≥66 mm.","PeriodicalId":229686,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Surgery and Interventions","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Late surgical conversion after failed endovascular aortic repair: Our single-institutional experience\",\"authors\":\"S. Akansel\",\"doi\":\"10.5606/e-cvsi.2023.1493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: In this study, we report our single-center experience with late surgical conversion (SC) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and risk factors for reintervention. Patients and methods: Between January 2007 and December 2017, a total of 98 patients (94 males, 4 females; mean age: 69.1±8.6 years; range, 35 to 86 years) who underwent infrarenal EVAR were retrospectively analyzed. During the study period, additional eight patients who underwent EVAR at an external center were referred to our center. Overall, nine patients underwent late SC. In the late SC group, stent grafts used for EVAR were Endurant™ (n=5), Talent™ (n=2), Powerlink™, and Anaconda™ (n=1). Results: The mean time from initial EVAR to open conversion was 45.3±35.4 months. Four (44.4%) patients presented with more than one different concomitant indications. The most frequent reason for the late SC was type 3 endoleak (n=5, 55.5%). Late SC was performed electively in five (55.5%) patients. Partial stent graft removal was performed in three (33.3%), complete removal in three (33.3%), and complete preservation of the stent graft in three (33.3%) patients. Among 98 patients, the mean aneurysm diameter was significantly higher in those with late complication and undergoing second EVAR (p=0.001). The cut-off value for second EVAR was ≥66 mm with a sensitivity of 88.89% and specificity of 71.91% (p=0.001). Conclusion: The surveillance program after EVAR is of utmost importance to ensure that patients do not need urgent conversion, particularly in patients with an initial aneurysm diameter of ≥66 mm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":229686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Surgery and Interventions\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Surgery and Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5606/e-cvsi.2023.1493\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Surgery and Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/e-cvsi.2023.1493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在本研究中,我们报告了单中心在血管内动脉瘤修补术(EVAR)后晚期手术转换(SC)的经验以及再次手术的风险因素。患者和方法:回顾性分析了 2007 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月间接受肾下 EVAR 的 98 例患者(94 例男性,4 例女性;平均年龄:69.1±8.6 岁;范围:35 岁至 86 岁)。在研究期间,另有 8 名在外部中心接受过 EVAR 的患者被转诊到本中心。总计有 9 名患者接受了晚期 SC 术。在晚期 SC 组中,用于 EVAR 的支架移植物有 Endurant™(5 例)、Talent™(2 例)、Powerlink™ 和 Anaconda™ (1 例)。结果:从最初的EVAR到开放手术转换的平均时间为(45.3±35.4)个月。有四名患者(44.4%)同时具有一种以上不同的适应症。晚期 SC 最常见的原因是 3 型内漏(5 例,55.5%)。有五名患者(55.5%)选择了晚期支架植入术。3名患者(33.3%)进行了部分支架移植物切除,3名患者(33.3%)进行了完全切除,3名患者(33.3%)完全保留了支架移植物。在 98 例患者中,晚期并发症患者和接受第二次 EVAR 的患者的平均动脉瘤直径明显更高(P=0.001)。第二次 EVAR 的临界值为≥66 毫米,敏感性为 88.89%,特异性为 71.91%(P=0.001)。结论:EVAR术后的监测计划对于确保患者无需紧急转院至关重要,尤其是对于初始动脉瘤直径≥66毫米的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Late surgical conversion after failed endovascular aortic repair: Our single-institutional experience
Objectives: In this study, we report our single-center experience with late surgical conversion (SC) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and risk factors for reintervention. Patients and methods: Between January 2007 and December 2017, a total of 98 patients (94 males, 4 females; mean age: 69.1±8.6 years; range, 35 to 86 years) who underwent infrarenal EVAR were retrospectively analyzed. During the study period, additional eight patients who underwent EVAR at an external center were referred to our center. Overall, nine patients underwent late SC. In the late SC group, stent grafts used for EVAR were Endurant™ (n=5), Talent™ (n=2), Powerlink™, and Anaconda™ (n=1). Results: The mean time from initial EVAR to open conversion was 45.3±35.4 months. Four (44.4%) patients presented with more than one different concomitant indications. The most frequent reason for the late SC was type 3 endoleak (n=5, 55.5%). Late SC was performed electively in five (55.5%) patients. Partial stent graft removal was performed in three (33.3%), complete removal in three (33.3%), and complete preservation of the stent graft in three (33.3%) patients. Among 98 patients, the mean aneurysm diameter was significantly higher in those with late complication and undergoing second EVAR (p=0.001). The cut-off value for second EVAR was ≥66 mm with a sensitivity of 88.89% and specificity of 71.91% (p=0.001). Conclusion: The surveillance program after EVAR is of utmost importance to ensure that patients do not need urgent conversion, particularly in patients with an initial aneurysm diameter of ≥66 mm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信