{"title":"英语的时间手势就是空间手势","authors":"Javier Valenzuela, Daniel Alcaraz-Carrión","doi":"10.5070/g6011126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is great deal of evidence, both linguistic and psycholinguistic, that time is structured with the help of space. This relationship has also been found in gesture studies: the gestures produced when uttering temporal expressions exhibit very clear and structured spatial properties. The question that remains, though, is whether these co-speech spatial gestures accompanying temporal expressions are the same as the spatial gestures produced with spatial expressions. Do we produce spatial gestures more frequently when uttering purely spatial expressions than when we are using temporal expressions? Are the characteristics of those spatial gestures equivalent in terms of parameters such as axis or directionality? What do these similarities or differences tell us about the use of space in time? The present study examines one grammatical construction (From X to Y) which can be used both for space and for time, and examines the gestural patterns associated with each of these different senses, noting their similarities and differences. Our results show that the gestures produced while uttering spatial expressions share the same characteristics with those carried out while uttering temporal expressions: (1) the frequency of gesturing is quite similar, pointing at a similar informational need, for both the spatial/concrete and the temporal/metaphorical cases; (2) the axes used are basically the same (with a higher indexically-based use of verticality in the case of spatial gestures), and (3) the directionality of the gestures is also shared, again eschewing the concrete-metaphorical distinction. These results are especially interesting, since they are also compatible with the hypothesis put forward by Cai & Connell (2015), hinting at a common representational format of both domains. At any case, this study reinforces the solid relationship between the domains of space and of time, proving once again how gesturing can be an invaluable tool in finding out about conceptualization patterns.","PeriodicalId":164622,"journal":{"name":"Glossa Psycholinguistics","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"English temporal gestures are spatial gestures\",\"authors\":\"Javier Valenzuela, Daniel Alcaraz-Carrión\",\"doi\":\"10.5070/g6011126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is great deal of evidence, both linguistic and psycholinguistic, that time is structured with the help of space. This relationship has also been found in gesture studies: the gestures produced when uttering temporal expressions exhibit very clear and structured spatial properties. The question that remains, though, is whether these co-speech spatial gestures accompanying temporal expressions are the same as the spatial gestures produced with spatial expressions. Do we produce spatial gestures more frequently when uttering purely spatial expressions than when we are using temporal expressions? Are the characteristics of those spatial gestures equivalent in terms of parameters such as axis or directionality? What do these similarities or differences tell us about the use of space in time? The present study examines one grammatical construction (From X to Y) which can be used both for space and for time, and examines the gestural patterns associated with each of these different senses, noting their similarities and differences. Our results show that the gestures produced while uttering spatial expressions share the same characteristics with those carried out while uttering temporal expressions: (1) the frequency of gesturing is quite similar, pointing at a similar informational need, for both the spatial/concrete and the temporal/metaphorical cases; (2) the axes used are basically the same (with a higher indexically-based use of verticality in the case of spatial gestures), and (3) the directionality of the gestures is also shared, again eschewing the concrete-metaphorical distinction. These results are especially interesting, since they are also compatible with the hypothesis put forward by Cai & Connell (2015), hinting at a common representational format of both domains. At any case, this study reinforces the solid relationship between the domains of space and of time, proving once again how gesturing can be an invaluable tool in finding out about conceptualization patterns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Glossa Psycholinguistics\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Glossa Psycholinguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5070/g6011126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glossa Psycholinguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/g6011126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
语言学和心理语言学都有大量证据表明,时间是在空间的帮助下结构化的。手势研究也发现了这种关系:在说出时间表达时产生的手势表现出非常明显和结构化的空间属性。但问题是,这些伴随时间表达的共同言语空间手势与空间表达时产生的空间手势是否相同。我们在说出纯粹的空间表达时是否比使用时间表达时更频繁地做出空间手势?就轴线或方向性等参数而言,这些空间手势的特征是否相同?这些相似或不同之处说明了什么?本研究探讨了一种既可用于空间又可用于时间的语法结构(从 X 到 Y),并研究了与这些不同意义相关的手势模式,注意到了它们的异同。我们的研究结果表明,在说出空间表达时产生的手势与说出时间表达时产生的手势具有相同的特点:(1)在空间/具体和时间/隐喻两种情况下,手势的频率非常相似,表明了类似的信息需求;(2)使用的轴线基本相同(在空间手势的情况下,垂直度的索引性使用更高);(3)手势的方向性也是相同的,再次避免了具体和隐喻的区别。这些结果特别有趣,因为它们也符合蔡和康奈尔(Cai & Connell,2015 年)提出的假设,暗示这两个领域有共同的表征格式。无论如何,这项研究加强了空间域和时间域之间的牢固关系,再次证明了手势是发现概念化模式的宝贵工具。
There is great deal of evidence, both linguistic and psycholinguistic, that time is structured with the help of space. This relationship has also been found in gesture studies: the gestures produced when uttering temporal expressions exhibit very clear and structured spatial properties. The question that remains, though, is whether these co-speech spatial gestures accompanying temporal expressions are the same as the spatial gestures produced with spatial expressions. Do we produce spatial gestures more frequently when uttering purely spatial expressions than when we are using temporal expressions? Are the characteristics of those spatial gestures equivalent in terms of parameters such as axis or directionality? What do these similarities or differences tell us about the use of space in time? The present study examines one grammatical construction (From X to Y) which can be used both for space and for time, and examines the gestural patterns associated with each of these different senses, noting their similarities and differences. Our results show that the gestures produced while uttering spatial expressions share the same characteristics with those carried out while uttering temporal expressions: (1) the frequency of gesturing is quite similar, pointing at a similar informational need, for both the spatial/concrete and the temporal/metaphorical cases; (2) the axes used are basically the same (with a higher indexically-based use of verticality in the case of spatial gestures), and (3) the directionality of the gestures is also shared, again eschewing the concrete-metaphorical distinction. These results are especially interesting, since they are also compatible with the hypothesis put forward by Cai & Connell (2015), hinting at a common representational format of both domains. At any case, this study reinforces the solid relationship between the domains of space and of time, proving once again how gesturing can be an invaluable tool in finding out about conceptualization patterns.