海报(临床/最佳实践实施) ID 1969157

IF 2.4 Q1 REHABILITATION
Julio C Furlan, Di Wang
{"title":"海报(临床/最佳实践实施) ID 1969157","authors":"Julio C Furlan, Di Wang","doi":"10.46292/sci23-1969157s","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the effects of concomitant TBI on injury epidemiology, management and outcomes of individuals with traumatic SCI. A propensity-score matched cohort study compared a SCI+TBI group (n=1018) with a SCI-only group (n=3687), which were matched on a 1:1 ratio by age, sex, severity and level of SCI, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. TBI was defined as a Glasgow coma score of <15 at admission. Both groups were compared regarding injury epidemiology (mechanism, ethnicity, GCS, other injuries), management (mechanical ventilation, traction, Methylprednisone, surgery, time to decompression), and post-SCI outcomes (length of stay [LOS], International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI [ISNCSCI] motor subscore, Functional Independence Measure, discharge destination, spasticity and pain at discharge). Overall, being white (OR=5.332, p=0.0265) was associated with having TBI, while having other body injuries (OR=0.095, p=0.0065) was associated with the SCI-only group. Odds of dying in a hospital were 2.442 times larger for the TBI+SCI group. The TBI+SCI group had longer acute-care LOS. Both groups had similar rehabilitation LOS. Odds of being discharged to nursing homes/long-term care facilities were 1.949 times higher for TBI+SCI individuals. Concomitant TBI did not influence change in ISNCSCI motor subscore from initial admission to final discharge. Odds of individuals with pain was 1.52 times higher for the TBI+SCI group. Occurrence of spasticity was similar between the groups. This study highlights discrepancies between the TBI+SCI and SCI-only groups regarding injury epidemiology, survival, discharge disposition, and pain. Both groups experienced similar access to treatment services, motor recovery, and spasticity. These data were presented in the 2022 Annual Meeting of the American Neurological Association, which has a different attendance audience.","PeriodicalId":46769,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Poster (Clinical/Best Practice Implementation) ID 1969157\",\"authors\":\"Julio C Furlan, Di Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.46292/sci23-1969157s\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examined the effects of concomitant TBI on injury epidemiology, management and outcomes of individuals with traumatic SCI. A propensity-score matched cohort study compared a SCI+TBI group (n=1018) with a SCI-only group (n=3687), which were matched on a 1:1 ratio by age, sex, severity and level of SCI, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. TBI was defined as a Glasgow coma score of <15 at admission. Both groups were compared regarding injury epidemiology (mechanism, ethnicity, GCS, other injuries), management (mechanical ventilation, traction, Methylprednisone, surgery, time to decompression), and post-SCI outcomes (length of stay [LOS], International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI [ISNCSCI] motor subscore, Functional Independence Measure, discharge destination, spasticity and pain at discharge). Overall, being white (OR=5.332, p=0.0265) was associated with having TBI, while having other body injuries (OR=0.095, p=0.0065) was associated with the SCI-only group. Odds of dying in a hospital were 2.442 times larger for the TBI+SCI group. The TBI+SCI group had longer acute-care LOS. Both groups had similar rehabilitation LOS. Odds of being discharged to nursing homes/long-term care facilities were 1.949 times higher for TBI+SCI individuals. Concomitant TBI did not influence change in ISNCSCI motor subscore from initial admission to final discharge. Odds of individuals with pain was 1.52 times higher for the TBI+SCI group. Occurrence of spasticity was similar between the groups. This study highlights discrepancies between the TBI+SCI and SCI-only groups regarding injury epidemiology, survival, discharge disposition, and pain. Both groups experienced similar access to treatment services, motor recovery, and spasticity. These data were presented in the 2022 Annual Meeting of the American Neurological Association, which has a different attendance audience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46292/sci23-1969157s\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46292/sci23-1969157s","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了并发创伤性脑损伤对创伤性 SCI 患者的损伤流行病学、管理和预后的影响。 一项倾向得分匹配队列研究比较了 SCI+TBI 组(人数=1018)和纯 SCI 组(人数=3687),这两组患者的年龄、性别、SCI 严重程度和水平以及 Charlson 合并症指数均按 1:1 的比例进行匹配。创伤性脑损伤的定义是入院时格拉斯哥昏迷评分小于 15 分。两组患者在损伤流行病学(机制、种族、GCS、其他损伤)、管理(机械通气、牵引、甲泼尼龙、手术、减压时间)和SCI后结果(住院时间、SCI神经系统分类国际标准(ISNCSCI)运动子评分、功能独立性测量、出院目的地、出院时的痉挛和疼痛)方面进行了比较。 总体而言,白人(OR=5.332,P=0.0265)与创伤性脑损伤相关,而其他身体损伤(OR=0.095,P=0.0065)与纯 SCI 组相关。创伤性脑损伤+脊髓损伤组死于医院的几率是创伤性脑损伤+脊髓损伤组的2.442倍。创伤性脑损伤+SCI组的急症护理生命周期更长。两组患者的康复生命周期相似。TBI+SCI患者出院后入住疗养院/长期护理机构的几率是TBI+SCI患者的1.949倍。从最初入院到最终出院,合并 TBI 不会影响 ISNCSCI 运动子分数的变化。TBI+SCI组患者出现疼痛的几率要高出1.52倍。两组患者出现痉挛的情况相似。 这项研究强调了TBI+SCI组和单纯SCI组在损伤流行病学、存活率、出院处置和疼痛方面的差异。两组患者在获得治疗服务、运动恢复和痉挛方面的情况相似。 这些数据已在美国神经病学协会2022年年会上公布,该年会的参会观众有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Poster (Clinical/Best Practice Implementation) ID 1969157
This study examined the effects of concomitant TBI on injury epidemiology, management and outcomes of individuals with traumatic SCI. A propensity-score matched cohort study compared a SCI+TBI group (n=1018) with a SCI-only group (n=3687), which were matched on a 1:1 ratio by age, sex, severity and level of SCI, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. TBI was defined as a Glasgow coma score of <15 at admission. Both groups were compared regarding injury epidemiology (mechanism, ethnicity, GCS, other injuries), management (mechanical ventilation, traction, Methylprednisone, surgery, time to decompression), and post-SCI outcomes (length of stay [LOS], International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI [ISNCSCI] motor subscore, Functional Independence Measure, discharge destination, spasticity and pain at discharge). Overall, being white (OR=5.332, p=0.0265) was associated with having TBI, while having other body injuries (OR=0.095, p=0.0065) was associated with the SCI-only group. Odds of dying in a hospital were 2.442 times larger for the TBI+SCI group. The TBI+SCI group had longer acute-care LOS. Both groups had similar rehabilitation LOS. Odds of being discharged to nursing homes/long-term care facilities were 1.949 times higher for TBI+SCI individuals. Concomitant TBI did not influence change in ISNCSCI motor subscore from initial admission to final discharge. Odds of individuals with pain was 1.52 times higher for the TBI+SCI group. Occurrence of spasticity was similar between the groups. This study highlights discrepancies between the TBI+SCI and SCI-only groups regarding injury epidemiology, survival, discharge disposition, and pain. Both groups experienced similar access to treatment services, motor recovery, and spasticity. These data were presented in the 2022 Annual Meeting of the American Neurological Association, which has a different attendance audience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Now in our 22nd year as the leading interdisciplinary journal of SCI rehabilitation techniques and care. TSCIR is peer-reviewed, practical, and features one key topic per issue. Published topics include: mobility, sexuality, genitourinary, functional assessment, skin care, psychosocial, high tetraplegia, physical activity, pediatric, FES, sci/tbi, electronic medicine, orthotics, secondary conditions, research, aging, legal issues, women & sci, pain, environmental effects, life care planning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信