戏仿是对言论自由的合理利用

Liene Vindele, R. Cane
{"title":"戏仿是对言论自由的合理利用","authors":"Liene Vindele, R. Cane","doi":"10.37804/1691-6077-2023-14-186-196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The right to criticize or parody has always been a fundamental human right. In today’s world of technology and the Internet, parodies or caricatures of someone’s work are not uncommon. Technology has become so readily available that anyone can create a parody or caricature of another person’s work. The main task of the nowadays researchers is find balance between one person’s right to the inviolability of his property and the right of other persons to imitate it. The aim of this article is to analyze the concept of parody and caricature, as well as the case law of different countries – exploring how case law assesses whether an imitated work can be defined as a parody, or whether it is an “unsuccessful” imitation. Where is the line where an author has created a parody or has already infringed the rights of another author? The methodological basis of this article is based on general scientific approaches (analysis and synthesis, deduction and induction, comparison, analogy and a systemic and structural-functional approach). The article also draws on court decisions, legislation, legal literature, publications and doctrine. Conclusions are drawn using the method of scientific induction and deduction.","PeriodicalId":226699,"journal":{"name":"Acta Prosperitatis","volume":"13 1","pages":"186 - 196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parody as a Fair Use of Freedom of Speech\",\"authors\":\"Liene Vindele, R. Cane\",\"doi\":\"10.37804/1691-6077-2023-14-186-196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The right to criticize or parody has always been a fundamental human right. In today’s world of technology and the Internet, parodies or caricatures of someone’s work are not uncommon. Technology has become so readily available that anyone can create a parody or caricature of another person’s work. The main task of the nowadays researchers is find balance between one person’s right to the inviolability of his property and the right of other persons to imitate it. The aim of this article is to analyze the concept of parody and caricature, as well as the case law of different countries – exploring how case law assesses whether an imitated work can be defined as a parody, or whether it is an “unsuccessful” imitation. Where is the line where an author has created a parody or has already infringed the rights of another author? The methodological basis of this article is based on general scientific approaches (analysis and synthesis, deduction and induction, comparison, analogy and a systemic and structural-functional approach). The article also draws on court decisions, legislation, legal literature, publications and doctrine. Conclusions are drawn using the method of scientific induction and deduction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":226699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Prosperitatis\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"186 - 196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Prosperitatis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37804/1691-6077-2023-14-186-196\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Prosperitatis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37804/1691-6077-2023-14-186-196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 批评或模仿的权利一直是一项基本人权。在当今科技和互联网发达的世界,模仿或讽刺他人作品的现象并不少见。技术已经变得如此便捷,以至于任何人都可以模仿或讽刺他人的作品。当今研究人员的主要任务是在一个人的财产不可侵犯权和其他人的模仿权之间找到平衡。本文旨在分析戏仿和漫画的概念以及不同国家的判例法--探讨判例法如何评估被模仿作品是否可以被定义为戏仿,或者是否属于 "不成功的 "模仿。作者创作了模仿作品或已经侵犯了另一作者的权利,界限在哪里?本文的方法论基础是一般科学方法(分析与综合、演绎与归纳、比较、类比以及系统和结构功能方法)。文章还参考了法院判决、立法、法律文献、出版物和学说。文章采用科学归纳和演绎的方法得出结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Parody as a Fair Use of Freedom of Speech
Abstract The right to criticize or parody has always been a fundamental human right. In today’s world of technology and the Internet, parodies or caricatures of someone’s work are not uncommon. Technology has become so readily available that anyone can create a parody or caricature of another person’s work. The main task of the nowadays researchers is find balance between one person’s right to the inviolability of his property and the right of other persons to imitate it. The aim of this article is to analyze the concept of parody and caricature, as well as the case law of different countries – exploring how case law assesses whether an imitated work can be defined as a parody, or whether it is an “unsuccessful” imitation. Where is the line where an author has created a parody or has already infringed the rights of another author? The methodological basis of this article is based on general scientific approaches (analysis and synthesis, deduction and induction, comparison, analogy and a systemic and structural-functional approach). The article also draws on court decisions, legislation, legal literature, publications and doctrine. Conclusions are drawn using the method of scientific induction and deduction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信