海报(临床/最佳实践实施)ID 1978673

IF 2.4 Q1 REHABILITATION
Jo Anne L. Savoie, Serene Qiu, Chelsea M. Crockford, Laura Kabbash
{"title":"海报(临床/最佳实践实施)ID 1978673","authors":"Jo Anne L. Savoie, Serene Qiu, Chelsea M. Crockford, Laura Kabbash","doi":"10.46292/sci23-1978673s","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To address gaps in peer-supported services for those with a mobility disability, a virtual group was designed to have trained mentors with lived experience working alongside rehabilitation professionals to share resources and strategies that promote healthy living. Sessions offered knowledge and support in goal setting, healthy eating, physical activity, adapted recreation, emotional well-being, and social connectedness. Three rounds of the group were offered with 12 participants completing the group in its entirety. Pre- and post-measures included the Self-Efficacy to Manage Scale (Lorig, et al, 2001), the Life Satisfaction Questionnaire-11 (Fugl-Meyer, et al., 1991), and the Readiness Ruler adapted to each wellness topic (Moyers, et al., 2009). Analyses before and after group showed a slight increase (Cohen’s d = 0.3) in their subjective well-being on the life satisfaction scale and a moderately higher sense of self-efficacy (Cohen’s d = 0.6) in managing symptoms. Although perceived importance for change was similar, participants reported higher confidence in their ability to change (Cohen’s d = 0.4) and greater readiness to make changes (Cohen’s d = 0.4) after the group. The program resulted in several successes including slight increase in life satisfaction and moderately higher sense of self-efficacy in managing symptoms. Confidence in ability and readiness to make change also increased. The project had a small sample size, but the outcomes support the value of embedding a peer-support element into traditional healthcare delivery.","PeriodicalId":46769,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Poster (Clinical/Best Practice Implementation) ID 1978673\",\"authors\":\"Jo Anne L. Savoie, Serene Qiu, Chelsea M. Crockford, Laura Kabbash\",\"doi\":\"10.46292/sci23-1978673s\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To address gaps in peer-supported services for those with a mobility disability, a virtual group was designed to have trained mentors with lived experience working alongside rehabilitation professionals to share resources and strategies that promote healthy living. Sessions offered knowledge and support in goal setting, healthy eating, physical activity, adapted recreation, emotional well-being, and social connectedness. Three rounds of the group were offered with 12 participants completing the group in its entirety. Pre- and post-measures included the Self-Efficacy to Manage Scale (Lorig, et al, 2001), the Life Satisfaction Questionnaire-11 (Fugl-Meyer, et al., 1991), and the Readiness Ruler adapted to each wellness topic (Moyers, et al., 2009). Analyses before and after group showed a slight increase (Cohen’s d = 0.3) in their subjective well-being on the life satisfaction scale and a moderately higher sense of self-efficacy (Cohen’s d = 0.6) in managing symptoms. Although perceived importance for change was similar, participants reported higher confidence in their ability to change (Cohen’s d = 0.4) and greater readiness to make changes (Cohen’s d = 0.4) after the group. The program resulted in several successes including slight increase in life satisfaction and moderately higher sense of self-efficacy in managing symptoms. Confidence in ability and readiness to make change also increased. The project had a small sample size, but the outcomes support the value of embedding a peer-support element into traditional healthcare delivery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46292/sci23-1978673s\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46292/sci23-1978673s","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了弥补针对行动不便者的同伴支持服务的不足,我们设计了一个虚拟小组,让受过培训、有生活经验的导师与康复专业人员一起工作,分享促进健康生活的资源和策略。 小组活动在目标设定、健康饮食、体育锻炼、适应性娱乐、情感健康和社会联系等方面提供知识和支持。小组共进行了三轮活动,共有 12 名参与者完成了整个小组活动。小组前后的测量包括自我管理能力量表(Lorig 等人,2001 年)、生活满意度问卷-11(Fugl-Meyer 等人,1991 年)以及根据每个健康主题调整的准备度量表(Moyers 等人,2009 年)。 分组前后的分析表明,他们在生活满意度量表上的主观幸福感略有提高(Cohen's d = 0.3),在控制症状方面的自我效能感略有提高(Cohen's d = 0.6)。虽然参与者认为改变的重要性相似,但在小组活动后,他们对自己改变的能力有了更大的信心(Cohen's d = 0.4),也更愿意做出改变(Cohen's d = 0.4)。 该计划取得了一些成功,包括生活满意度略有提高,控制症状的自我效能感略有提高。对自己能力的信心和做出改变的意愿也有所增强。该项目样本量较小,但其结果支持了在传统医疗保健服务中嵌入同伴支持元素的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Poster (Clinical/Best Practice Implementation) ID 1978673
To address gaps in peer-supported services for those with a mobility disability, a virtual group was designed to have trained mentors with lived experience working alongside rehabilitation professionals to share resources and strategies that promote healthy living. Sessions offered knowledge and support in goal setting, healthy eating, physical activity, adapted recreation, emotional well-being, and social connectedness. Three rounds of the group were offered with 12 participants completing the group in its entirety. Pre- and post-measures included the Self-Efficacy to Manage Scale (Lorig, et al, 2001), the Life Satisfaction Questionnaire-11 (Fugl-Meyer, et al., 1991), and the Readiness Ruler adapted to each wellness topic (Moyers, et al., 2009). Analyses before and after group showed a slight increase (Cohen’s d = 0.3) in their subjective well-being on the life satisfaction scale and a moderately higher sense of self-efficacy (Cohen’s d = 0.6) in managing symptoms. Although perceived importance for change was similar, participants reported higher confidence in their ability to change (Cohen’s d = 0.4) and greater readiness to make changes (Cohen’s d = 0.4) after the group. The program resulted in several successes including slight increase in life satisfaction and moderately higher sense of self-efficacy in managing symptoms. Confidence in ability and readiness to make change also increased. The project had a small sample size, but the outcomes support the value of embedding a peer-support element into traditional healthcare delivery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Now in our 22nd year as the leading interdisciplinary journal of SCI rehabilitation techniques and care. TSCIR is peer-reviewed, practical, and features one key topic per issue. Published topics include: mobility, sexuality, genitourinary, functional assessment, skin care, psychosocial, high tetraplegia, physical activity, pediatric, FES, sci/tbi, electronic medicine, orthotics, secondary conditions, research, aging, legal issues, women & sci, pain, environmental effects, life care planning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信