殖民主义、过剩人口和马克思政治经济学批判

IF 0.4 Q1 HISTORY
Duy Lap Nguyen
{"title":"殖民主义、过剩人口和马克思政治经济学批判","authors":"Duy Lap Nguyen","doi":"10.1086/726751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines Karl Marx’s critique of Thomas Malthus’s theory of population and his discussion of colonization in the last chapter of Capital. For Marx, Malthus’s theory naturalizes the process of social reproduction specific to capitalism, a process that was disrupted in the colonies, where, owing to the availability of land, the superfluous population of immigrant workers were transformed into independent producers.","PeriodicalId":43410,"journal":{"name":"Critical Historical Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Colonialism, Surplus Population, and the Marxian Critique of Political Economy\",\"authors\":\"Duy Lap Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/726751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines Karl Marx’s critique of Thomas Malthus’s theory of population and his discussion of colonization in the last chapter of Capital. For Marx, Malthus’s theory naturalizes the process of social reproduction specific to capitalism, a process that was disrupted in the colonies, where, owing to the availability of land, the superfluous population of immigrant workers were transformed into independent producers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Historical Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Historical Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/726751\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Historical Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了卡尔-马克思对托马斯-马尔萨斯人口理论的批判及其在《资本论》最后一章中对殖民化的论述。在马克思看来,马尔萨斯的理论将资本主义特有的社会再生产过程自然化了,而这一过程在殖民地被打破了,在殖民地,由于土地的供应,移民工人的多余人口转变为独立的生产者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Colonialism, Surplus Population, and the Marxian Critique of Political Economy
This article examines Karl Marx’s critique of Thomas Malthus’s theory of population and his discussion of colonization in the last chapter of Capital. For Marx, Malthus’s theory naturalizes the process of social reproduction specific to capitalism, a process that was disrupted in the colonies, where, owing to the availability of land, the superfluous population of immigrant workers were transformed into independent producers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信