南海仲裁:法律和地缘政治影响

Suhardi Somomoeljono, Jurisdito Hutomo Hardy
{"title":"南海仲裁:法律和地缘政治影响","authors":"Suhardi Somomoeljono, Jurisdito Hutomo Hardy","doi":"10.21070/ijins.v25i.958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present research scrutinizes the arbitration case between the Philippines and the People's Republic of China concerning the contested maritime zones in the South China Sea, a global hotspot for territorial disputes, rich natural resources, and strategic naval passages. Utilizing a normative legal research methodology coupled with a descriptive-analytical approach, this study carefully examines international legal frameworks, including UNCLOS, and draws upon a diverse range of data sources like legal documents, official statements, and scholarly literature to dissect the nuances of the South China Sea dispute. The findings reveal that the arbitration process, initiated by the Philippines in 2013 and culminating in a 2016 verdict favoring several of its claims, not only holds the promise to fortify international maritime law and foster regional stability but also underscores the critical role of diplomatic efforts in actualizing comprehensive solutions. Nonetheless, the endeavor is not without its pitfalls, notably the absence of stringent sanctions and implementation challenges. Furthermore, the arbitration verdict significantly influences the Philippines-PRC bilateral relations, affecting territorial claims and regional economies, while reaffirming UNCLOS's authority in governing international maritime conflicts. Therefore, the research advocates for sustained diplomatic initiatives and collaboration as a complementary pathway to arbitration, envisioning a harmonious resolution to the complex and multifaceted South China Sea dispute. Highlights: The arbitration case between the Philippines and the PRC reaffirmed the crucial role of UNCLOS in guiding international maritime disputes and fostering regional stability. Despite the potential to enhance international maritime law and prevent conflicts, the arbitration process faces challenges in terms of enforcing sanctions and ensuring comprehensive implementation. The arbitration verdict has deep-seated implications on Philippines-PRC bilateral relations, impacting territorial claims, economic prospects, and necessitating sustained diplomatic efforts for a more cohesive resolution to the South China Sea dispute. Keywords: South China Sea, International Arbitration, UNCLOS, Philippines-PRC Relations, Maritime Law.","PeriodicalId":431998,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arbitration in the South China Sea: Legal and Geopolitical Ramifications\",\"authors\":\"Suhardi Somomoeljono, Jurisdito Hutomo Hardy\",\"doi\":\"10.21070/ijins.v25i.958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present research scrutinizes the arbitration case between the Philippines and the People's Republic of China concerning the contested maritime zones in the South China Sea, a global hotspot for territorial disputes, rich natural resources, and strategic naval passages. Utilizing a normative legal research methodology coupled with a descriptive-analytical approach, this study carefully examines international legal frameworks, including UNCLOS, and draws upon a diverse range of data sources like legal documents, official statements, and scholarly literature to dissect the nuances of the South China Sea dispute. The findings reveal that the arbitration process, initiated by the Philippines in 2013 and culminating in a 2016 verdict favoring several of its claims, not only holds the promise to fortify international maritime law and foster regional stability but also underscores the critical role of diplomatic efforts in actualizing comprehensive solutions. Nonetheless, the endeavor is not without its pitfalls, notably the absence of stringent sanctions and implementation challenges. Furthermore, the arbitration verdict significantly influences the Philippines-PRC bilateral relations, affecting territorial claims and regional economies, while reaffirming UNCLOS's authority in governing international maritime conflicts. Therefore, the research advocates for sustained diplomatic initiatives and collaboration as a complementary pathway to arbitration, envisioning a harmonious resolution to the complex and multifaceted South China Sea dispute. Highlights: The arbitration case between the Philippines and the PRC reaffirmed the crucial role of UNCLOS in guiding international maritime disputes and fostering regional stability. Despite the potential to enhance international maritime law and prevent conflicts, the arbitration process faces challenges in terms of enforcing sanctions and ensuring comprehensive implementation. The arbitration verdict has deep-seated implications on Philippines-PRC bilateral relations, impacting territorial claims, economic prospects, and necessitating sustained diplomatic efforts for a more cohesive resolution to the South China Sea dispute. Keywords: South China Sea, International Arbitration, UNCLOS, Philippines-PRC Relations, Maritime Law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21070/ijins.v25i.958\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21070/ijins.v25i.958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

南海是全球领土争端、丰富自然资源和海军战略通道的热点地区,本研究仔细研究了菲律宾和中华人民共和国之间关于南海有争议海域的仲裁案件。本研究采用规范性法律研究方法和描述性分析方法,仔细研究了包括《联合国海洋法公约》在内的国际法律框架,并借鉴了法律文件、官方声明和学术文献等各种数据来源,剖析了南海争端的细微差别。研究结果表明,由菲律宾于 2013 年发起、并最终于 2016 年做出有利于其若干主张的裁决的仲裁程序,不仅有望加强国际海事法和促进地区稳定,还凸显了外交努力在实现全面解决方案方面的关键作用。然而,这一努力并非没有缺陷,尤其是缺乏严格的制裁和执行方面的挑战。此外,仲裁裁决极大地影响了菲律宾与中国的双边关系,影响了领土主张和地区经济,同时重申了《联合国海洋法公约》在管理国际海洋冲突方面的权威。因此,本研究主张将持续的外交举措与合作作为仲裁的补充途径,以和谐的方式解决复杂多变的南海争端。 亮点: 菲律宾和中华人民共和国之间的仲裁案再次证明了《联合国海洋法公约》在指导国际海洋争端和促进地区稳定方面的关键作用。 尽管仲裁程序具有加强国际海事法和预防冲突的潜力,但在执行制裁和确保全面实施方面仍面临挑战。 仲裁裁决对菲律宾和中国的双边关系有着深远的影响,它影响到领土主张和经济前景,需要持续的外交努力,以更有凝聚力的方式解决南海争端。 关键词南海、国际仲裁、《联合国海洋法公约》、菲律宾-中国关系、海事法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Arbitration in the South China Sea: Legal and Geopolitical Ramifications
The present research scrutinizes the arbitration case between the Philippines and the People's Republic of China concerning the contested maritime zones in the South China Sea, a global hotspot for territorial disputes, rich natural resources, and strategic naval passages. Utilizing a normative legal research methodology coupled with a descriptive-analytical approach, this study carefully examines international legal frameworks, including UNCLOS, and draws upon a diverse range of data sources like legal documents, official statements, and scholarly literature to dissect the nuances of the South China Sea dispute. The findings reveal that the arbitration process, initiated by the Philippines in 2013 and culminating in a 2016 verdict favoring several of its claims, not only holds the promise to fortify international maritime law and foster regional stability but also underscores the critical role of diplomatic efforts in actualizing comprehensive solutions. Nonetheless, the endeavor is not without its pitfalls, notably the absence of stringent sanctions and implementation challenges. Furthermore, the arbitration verdict significantly influences the Philippines-PRC bilateral relations, affecting territorial claims and regional economies, while reaffirming UNCLOS's authority in governing international maritime conflicts. Therefore, the research advocates for sustained diplomatic initiatives and collaboration as a complementary pathway to arbitration, envisioning a harmonious resolution to the complex and multifaceted South China Sea dispute. Highlights: The arbitration case between the Philippines and the PRC reaffirmed the crucial role of UNCLOS in guiding international maritime disputes and fostering regional stability. Despite the potential to enhance international maritime law and prevent conflicts, the arbitration process faces challenges in terms of enforcing sanctions and ensuring comprehensive implementation. The arbitration verdict has deep-seated implications on Philippines-PRC bilateral relations, impacting territorial claims, economic prospects, and necessitating sustained diplomatic efforts for a more cohesive resolution to the South China Sea dispute. Keywords: South China Sea, International Arbitration, UNCLOS, Philippines-PRC Relations, Maritime Law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信