侵蚀基础:数字化对建筑教育的影响

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Amitabh Verma
{"title":"侵蚀基础:数字化对建筑教育的影响","authors":"Amitabh Verma","doi":"10.1386/drtp_00118_7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent decades, drawing’s centuries-old centrality within architecture and landscape architecture has been largely co-opted by digitalization. While advantageous to companies for enhancing productivity and profitability, computerization has unfortunately been insalubrious within academia, undermining the teaching of philosophical and artistic dimensions. Its promises of convenience and speed have redirected student attention towards non-cerebral, production activities, marginalizing the intellectuality which is design pedagogy’s primary objective. Summarizing the origin and implications of this ‘revolution’, this article calls for a curricular reversion, positing that re-prioritizing drawing is vital for cultivating the capabilities which underpin the profession’s vitality and integrity, and manifest its essential spirit.","PeriodicalId":36057,"journal":{"name":"Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice","volume":"32 5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eroding the foundation: Digitalization’s impact on architectural education\",\"authors\":\"Amitabh Verma\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/drtp_00118_7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent decades, drawing’s centuries-old centrality within architecture and landscape architecture has been largely co-opted by digitalization. While advantageous to companies for enhancing productivity and profitability, computerization has unfortunately been insalubrious within academia, undermining the teaching of philosophical and artistic dimensions. Its promises of convenience and speed have redirected student attention towards non-cerebral, production activities, marginalizing the intellectuality which is design pedagogy’s primary objective. Summarizing the origin and implications of this ‘revolution’, this article calls for a curricular reversion, positing that re-prioritizing drawing is vital for cultivating the capabilities which underpin the profession’s vitality and integrity, and manifest its essential spirit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice\",\"volume\":\"32 5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/drtp_00118_7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/drtp_00118_7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近几十年来,素描在建筑和景观设计中长达数百年的核心地位在很大程度上被数字化所取代。虽然计算机化对公司提高生产力和盈利能力有利,但不幸的是,它在学术界却不受欢迎,破坏了哲学和艺术方面的教学。它所承诺的方便和快捷使学生的注意力转向了非脑力的生产活动,而设计教学法的首要目标--知识性却被边缘化了。本文总结了这场 "革命 "的起源和影响,呼吁进行课程改革,认为重新优先考虑绘画对于培养能力至关重要,而这种能力正是设计专业的活力和完整性的基础,也是其基本精神的体现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Eroding the foundation: Digitalization’s impact on architectural education
In recent decades, drawing’s centuries-old centrality within architecture and landscape architecture has been largely co-opted by digitalization. While advantageous to companies for enhancing productivity and profitability, computerization has unfortunately been insalubrious within academia, undermining the teaching of philosophical and artistic dimensions. Its promises of convenience and speed have redirected student attention towards non-cerebral, production activities, marginalizing the intellectuality which is design pedagogy’s primary objective. Summarizing the origin and implications of this ‘revolution’, this article calls for a curricular reversion, positing that re-prioritizing drawing is vital for cultivating the capabilities which underpin the profession’s vitality and integrity, and manifest its essential spirit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice
Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信