{"title":"使用不同形状的 EVA 弹性材料对重型地板冲击噪音进行比较分析","authors":"Jakin Lee, Chan-Hoon Haan","doi":"10.1121/10.0023013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social issues concerning the floor impact noises are increasing as apartments are being increased in Korea. The present study aims to improve the floor impact noises using various shapes of EVA resilient materials in composite floor structures. In order to this, three different shapes of EVA resilient materials were used including flat plate type, deck plate type, and cavity type of EVA. boards. All the composite structure consisted of PP panel, PET sound absorption materials and EVA resilient materials with a total depth of 40mm. Also, each shape of EVA has two different types according to the use of foothold of EVA materials. For the mount type of structure, the used numbers of EVA foothold was 25, 56, and 41 per 1 m2 of area. All the floor impact noise measurements were done at the recognized testing authority using impact ball as the standard heavy-weight floor impact sound source. The values of L’i, Fmax, and AW were deduced from every measurements. As a result, regardless of the EVA shapes, better performances were drawn when EVA footholds were used, i. e., mount type. It was shown that the average L’i, Fmax, and AW value of mount types was 41–42dB while average value of 47–48 dB for deck plate type. 50–55 dB for flat plate and cavity type were measured. It can be recognized that the good performance of mount type EVA materials is caused by the air layer gap around the EVA footholds as well as the low dynamic elastic modulus of EVA.","PeriodicalId":256727,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of the heavy-weight floor impact noises using various shapes of EVA resilient materials\",\"authors\":\"Jakin Lee, Chan-Hoon Haan\",\"doi\":\"10.1121/10.0023013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social issues concerning the floor impact noises are increasing as apartments are being increased in Korea. The present study aims to improve the floor impact noises using various shapes of EVA resilient materials in composite floor structures. In order to this, three different shapes of EVA resilient materials were used including flat plate type, deck plate type, and cavity type of EVA. boards. All the composite structure consisted of PP panel, PET sound absorption materials and EVA resilient materials with a total depth of 40mm. Also, each shape of EVA has two different types according to the use of foothold of EVA materials. For the mount type of structure, the used numbers of EVA foothold was 25, 56, and 41 per 1 m2 of area. All the floor impact noise measurements were done at the recognized testing authority using impact ball as the standard heavy-weight floor impact sound source. The values of L’i, Fmax, and AW were deduced from every measurements. As a result, regardless of the EVA shapes, better performances were drawn when EVA footholds were used, i. e., mount type. It was shown that the average L’i, Fmax, and AW value of mount types was 41–42dB while average value of 47–48 dB for deck plate type. 50–55 dB for flat plate and cavity type were measured. It can be recognized that the good performance of mount type EVA materials is caused by the air layer gap around the EVA footholds as well as the low dynamic elastic modulus of EVA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0023013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0023013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
随着韩国公寓的增加,有关地板撞击噪音的社会问题也日益增多。本研究旨在利用复合楼板结构中不同形状的 EVA 弹性材料来改善楼板撞击噪音。为此,我们使用了三种不同形状的 EVA 弹性材料,包括平板型、甲板型和空腔型 EVA 板。所有复合结构都由 PP 板、PET 吸音材料和 EVA 弹性材料组成,总深度为 40 毫米。此外,根据 EVA 材料的支座用途,每种形状的 EVA 有两种不同类型。在安装结构类型中,每 1 平方米面积使用的 EVA 支座数量分别为 25、56 和 41 个。所有地面撞击噪声测量均在公认的测试机构进行,使用撞击球作为标准重型地面撞击声源。L'i、Fmax 和 AW 值都是从每次测量中推导出来的。结果表明,无论 EVA 的形状如何,当使用 EVA 支脚(即支架类型)时,都能获得更好的性能。结果表明,支架类型的平均 L'i、Fmax 和 AW 值为 41-42dB,而甲板类型的平均值为 47-48dB。平板式和空腔式的平均值为 50-55 dB。可以看出,安装型 EVA 材料的良好性能是由 EVA 支座周围的空气层间隙以及 EVA 的低动态弹性模量造成的。
Comparative analysis of the heavy-weight floor impact noises using various shapes of EVA resilient materials
Social issues concerning the floor impact noises are increasing as apartments are being increased in Korea. The present study aims to improve the floor impact noises using various shapes of EVA resilient materials in composite floor structures. In order to this, three different shapes of EVA resilient materials were used including flat plate type, deck plate type, and cavity type of EVA. boards. All the composite structure consisted of PP panel, PET sound absorption materials and EVA resilient materials with a total depth of 40mm. Also, each shape of EVA has two different types according to the use of foothold of EVA materials. For the mount type of structure, the used numbers of EVA foothold was 25, 56, and 41 per 1 m2 of area. All the floor impact noise measurements were done at the recognized testing authority using impact ball as the standard heavy-weight floor impact sound source. The values of L’i, Fmax, and AW were deduced from every measurements. As a result, regardless of the EVA shapes, better performances were drawn when EVA footholds were used, i. e., mount type. It was shown that the average L’i, Fmax, and AW value of mount types was 41–42dB while average value of 47–48 dB for deck plate type. 50–55 dB for flat plate and cavity type were measured. It can be recognized that the good performance of mount type EVA materials is caused by the air layer gap around the EVA footholds as well as the low dynamic elastic modulus of EVA.