术中测量枕骨到 C2 的角度和外耳道到轴的角度,以优化后窝减压和枕颈融合术治疗复杂奇异畸形时的对齐方式

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Rachael K. Han, John K. Chae, Andrew L. A. Garton, Amanda Cruz, Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez, Ibrahim Hussain, Roger Härtl, Jeffrey P Greenfield
{"title":"术中测量枕骨到 C2 的角度和外耳道到轴的角度,以优化后窝减压和枕颈融合术治疗复杂奇异畸形时的对齐方式","authors":"Rachael K. Han, John K. Chae, Andrew L. A. Garton, Amanda Cruz, Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez, Ibrahim Hussain, Roger Härtl, Jeffrey P Greenfield","doi":"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_59_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Excess flexion or extension during occipitocervical fusion (OCF) can lead to postoperative complications, such as dysphagia, respiratory problems, line of sight issues, and neck pain, but posterior fossa decompression (PFD) and OCF require different positions that require intraoperative manipulation. Objective: The objective of this study was to describe quantitative fluoroscopic morphometrics in Chiari malformation (CM) patients with symptoms of craniocervical instability (CCI) and demonstrate the intraoperative application of these measurements to achieve neutral craniocervical alignment while leveraging a single axis of motion with the Mayfield head clamp locking mechanism. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients with CM 1 and 1.5 and features of CCI who underwent PFD and OCF at a single-center institution from March 2015 to October 2020 was performed. Patient demographics, preoperative presentation, radiographic morphometrics, operative details, complications, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Results: A total of 39 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 37 patients (94.9%) did not require additional revision surgery after PFD and OCF. In this nonrevision cohort, preoperative to postoperative occipital to C2 angle (O-C2a) (13.5° ± 10.4° vs. 17.5° ± 10.1°, P = 0.047) and narrowest oropharyngeal airway space (nPAS) (10.9 ± 3.4 mm vs. 13.1 ± 4.8 mm, P = 0.007) increased significantly. These measurements were decreased in the two patients who required revision surgery due to postoperative dysphagia (mean difference – 16.6°° in O C2a and 12.8°° in occipital and external acoustic meatus to axis angle). Based on these results, these fluoroscopic morphometrics are intraoperatively assessed, utilizing a locking Mayfield head clamp repositioning maneuver to optimize craniocervical alignment prior to rod placement from the occipital plate to cervical screws. Conclusion: Establishing a preoperative baseline of reliable fluoroscopic morphometrics can guide surgeons intraoperatively in appropriate patient realignment during combined PFD and OCF, and may prevent postoperative complications.","PeriodicalId":51721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative occipital to C2 angle and external acoustic meatus-to-axis angular measurements for optimizing alignment during posterior fossa decompression and occipitocervical fusion for complex Chiari malformation\",\"authors\":\"Rachael K. Han, John K. Chae, Andrew L. A. Garton, Amanda Cruz, Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez, Ibrahim Hussain, Roger Härtl, Jeffrey P Greenfield\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_59_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Excess flexion or extension during occipitocervical fusion (OCF) can lead to postoperative complications, such as dysphagia, respiratory problems, line of sight issues, and neck pain, but posterior fossa decompression (PFD) and OCF require different positions that require intraoperative manipulation. Objective: The objective of this study was to describe quantitative fluoroscopic morphometrics in Chiari malformation (CM) patients with symptoms of craniocervical instability (CCI) and demonstrate the intraoperative application of these measurements to achieve neutral craniocervical alignment while leveraging a single axis of motion with the Mayfield head clamp locking mechanism. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients with CM 1 and 1.5 and features of CCI who underwent PFD and OCF at a single-center institution from March 2015 to October 2020 was performed. Patient demographics, preoperative presentation, radiographic morphometrics, operative details, complications, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Results: A total of 39 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 37 patients (94.9%) did not require additional revision surgery after PFD and OCF. In this nonrevision cohort, preoperative to postoperative occipital to C2 angle (O-C2a) (13.5° ± 10.4° vs. 17.5° ± 10.1°, P = 0.047) and narrowest oropharyngeal airway space (nPAS) (10.9 ± 3.4 mm vs. 13.1 ± 4.8 mm, P = 0.007) increased significantly. These measurements were decreased in the two patients who required revision surgery due to postoperative dysphagia (mean difference – 16.6°° in O C2a and 12.8°° in occipital and external acoustic meatus to axis angle). Based on these results, these fluoroscopic morphometrics are intraoperatively assessed, utilizing a locking Mayfield head clamp repositioning maneuver to optimize craniocervical alignment prior to rod placement from the occipital plate to cervical screws. Conclusion: Establishing a preoperative baseline of reliable fluoroscopic morphometrics can guide surgeons intraoperatively in appropriate patient realignment during combined PFD and OCF, and may prevent postoperative complications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_59_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_59_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:枕颈融合术(OCF)中过度屈曲或伸展可导致术后并发症,如吞咽困难、呼吸困难、视线问题和颈部疼痛,但后窝减压术(PFD)和枕颈融合术需要不同的体位,因此需要术中操作。研究目的本研究旨在描述具有颅颈不稳(CCI)症状的Chiari畸形(CM)患者的定量透视形态测量,并演示如何在术中应用这些测量结果实现中性颅颈对齐,同时利用梅菲尔德头钳锁定机制实现单轴运动。方法:对 2015 年 3 月至 2020 年 10 月期间在一家单中心机构接受 PFD 和 OCF 的 CM 1 和 1.5 且具有 CCI 特征的患者进行回顾性队列研究。研究分析了患者的人口统计学特征、术前表现、影像学形态测量、手术细节、并发症和临床结果。结果:共有39名患者符合纳入标准,其中37名患者(94.9%)在PFD和OCF术后无需再进行翻修手术。在这批未接受翻修手术的患者中,术前与术后枕骨与C2的夹角(O-C2a)(13.5° ± 10.4° vs. 17.5° ± 10.1°,P = 0.047)和最窄口咽气道间隙(nPAS)(10.9 ± 3.4 mm vs. 13.1 ± 4.8 mm,P = 0.007)显著增加。在两名因术后吞咽困难而需要进行翻修手术的患者中,这些测量值有所下降(O C2a 的平均差异为 16.6°°,枕骨和外耳道与轴线的角度为 12.8°°)。根据这些结果,在术中对这些透视形态测量进行评估,利用锁定梅菲尔德头钳复位手法,在从枕骨板到颈椎螺钉的杆置入之前优化颅颈对位。结论建立可靠的术前透视形态测量基线可指导外科医生在术中对患者进行适当的复位,从而避免术后并发症的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intraoperative occipital to C2 angle and external acoustic meatus-to-axis angular measurements for optimizing alignment during posterior fossa decompression and occipitocervical fusion for complex Chiari malformation
Background: Excess flexion or extension during occipitocervical fusion (OCF) can lead to postoperative complications, such as dysphagia, respiratory problems, line of sight issues, and neck pain, but posterior fossa decompression (PFD) and OCF require different positions that require intraoperative manipulation. Objective: The objective of this study was to describe quantitative fluoroscopic morphometrics in Chiari malformation (CM) patients with symptoms of craniocervical instability (CCI) and demonstrate the intraoperative application of these measurements to achieve neutral craniocervical alignment while leveraging a single axis of motion with the Mayfield head clamp locking mechanism. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients with CM 1 and 1.5 and features of CCI who underwent PFD and OCF at a single-center institution from March 2015 to October 2020 was performed. Patient demographics, preoperative presentation, radiographic morphometrics, operative details, complications, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Results: A total of 39 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 37 patients (94.9%) did not require additional revision surgery after PFD and OCF. In this nonrevision cohort, preoperative to postoperative occipital to C2 angle (O-C2a) (13.5° ± 10.4° vs. 17.5° ± 10.1°, P = 0.047) and narrowest oropharyngeal airway space (nPAS) (10.9 ± 3.4 mm vs. 13.1 ± 4.8 mm, P = 0.007) increased significantly. These measurements were decreased in the two patients who required revision surgery due to postoperative dysphagia (mean difference – 16.6°° in O C2a and 12.8°° in occipital and external acoustic meatus to axis angle). Based on these results, these fluoroscopic morphometrics are intraoperatively assessed, utilizing a locking Mayfield head clamp repositioning maneuver to optimize craniocervical alignment prior to rod placement from the occipital plate to cervical screws. Conclusion: Establishing a preoperative baseline of reliable fluoroscopic morphometrics can guide surgeons intraoperatively in appropriate patient realignment during combined PFD and OCF, and may prevent postoperative complications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信