Salah Saber Mabrouk, Essam El-Din Abd El-Azim El-Desouky, Abd El-Fattah Morsy Saeid
{"title":"胰十二指肠切除术后胰空肠造口术与胰胃造口术的比较研究","authors":"Salah Saber Mabrouk, Essam El-Din Abd El-Azim El-Desouky, Abd El-Fattah Morsy Saeid","doi":"10.21608/amj.2023.326883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy are the two techniques for pancreatic anastomosis that are widely established for the reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Aim: To study the effect of the type of pancreaticoenteric reconstruction pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy (PJ versus PG) after pancreaticoduodenectomy regarding the post-operative mortality and morbidity particularly pancreatic fistula (PF). Patients and Methods: A prospective cohort study included 40 patients with pancreatic or periampullary cancer who undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy. The patients divided randomizly into two groups; Group (A)included 20 patients who had undergone pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction while group (B) included 20 patients who had undergone pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction. Results: Mean operative time in group A and B was 7.6 ± 2.2 and 7.2 ± 2.7, mean blood loss 984.7 ± 253.2 and 852.5 ± 152.6, in most of the cases there was a Drains in contact with anastomosis was 85% and 70%, respectively. Also, there is no significant difference between both groups regarding intraoperative data. Considering postoperative complications, there was significant difference between both groups regarding","PeriodicalId":7627,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Medical Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY AND PANCREATICOGASTROSTOMY FOLLOWING PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY\",\"authors\":\"Salah Saber Mabrouk, Essam El-Din Abd El-Azim El-Desouky, Abd El-Fattah Morsy Saeid\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/amj.2023.326883\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy are the two techniques for pancreatic anastomosis that are widely established for the reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Aim: To study the effect of the type of pancreaticoenteric reconstruction pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy (PJ versus PG) after pancreaticoduodenectomy regarding the post-operative mortality and morbidity particularly pancreatic fistula (PF). Patients and Methods: A prospective cohort study included 40 patients with pancreatic or periampullary cancer who undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy. The patients divided randomizly into two groups; Group (A)included 20 patients who had undergone pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction while group (B) included 20 patients who had undergone pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction. Results: Mean operative time in group A and B was 7.6 ± 2.2 and 7.2 ± 2.7, mean blood loss 984.7 ± 253.2 and 852.5 ± 152.6, in most of the cases there was a Drains in contact with anastomosis was 85% and 70%, respectively. Also, there is no significant difference between both groups regarding intraoperative data. Considering postoperative complications, there was significant difference between both groups regarding\",\"PeriodicalId\":7627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Azhar Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Azhar Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/amj.2023.326883\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/amj.2023.326883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY AND PANCREATICOGASTROSTOMY FOLLOWING PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY
Background: Pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy are the two techniques for pancreatic anastomosis that are widely established for the reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Aim: To study the effect of the type of pancreaticoenteric reconstruction pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy (PJ versus PG) after pancreaticoduodenectomy regarding the post-operative mortality and morbidity particularly pancreatic fistula (PF). Patients and Methods: A prospective cohort study included 40 patients with pancreatic or periampullary cancer who undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy. The patients divided randomizly into two groups; Group (A)included 20 patients who had undergone pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction while group (B) included 20 patients who had undergone pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction. Results: Mean operative time in group A and B was 7.6 ± 2.2 and 7.2 ± 2.7, mean blood loss 984.7 ± 253.2 and 852.5 ± 152.6, in most of the cases there was a Drains in contact with anastomosis was 85% and 70%, respectively. Also, there is no significant difference between both groups regarding intraoperative data. Considering postoperative complications, there was significant difference between both groups regarding