欧洲和土耳其禁止佩戴头巾的理由:比较分析

H. Ş. Albayrak
{"title":"欧洲和土耳其禁止佩戴头巾的理由:比较分析","authors":"H. Ş. Albayrak","doi":"10.1080/12259276.2023.2295685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study aims to descriptively analyze public debates in Europe and Turkey on Muslim women's head coverings in the context of similarities and differences. The main question the study attempts to answer is: How are the headscarf bans in Europe and Turkey discursively constructed and justified after 9/11 in Europe and the 28 February 1997 era in Turkey and what differences and parallels can be observed? With this question in mind, I first summarize the practices regarding the headscarf in Europe and Turkey and the policies adopted by the states. I also examine how headscarf bans are justified in public discourses in European countries and in Turkey. What the study ultimately reveals is that despite their differences in cultural, religious, and socio-political backgrounds, the European countries and Turkey have developed comparable perspectives and procedures regarding the representation of Muslim women in the public sphere during the historical eras compared.","PeriodicalId":502394,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Women's Studies","volume":"4 1","pages":"484 - 505"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Justification of headscarf bans in Europe and Turkey: A comparative analysis\",\"authors\":\"H. Ş. Albayrak\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/12259276.2023.2295685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study aims to descriptively analyze public debates in Europe and Turkey on Muslim women's head coverings in the context of similarities and differences. The main question the study attempts to answer is: How are the headscarf bans in Europe and Turkey discursively constructed and justified after 9/11 in Europe and the 28 February 1997 era in Turkey and what differences and parallels can be observed? With this question in mind, I first summarize the practices regarding the headscarf in Europe and Turkey and the policies adopted by the states. I also examine how headscarf bans are justified in public discourses in European countries and in Turkey. What the study ultimately reveals is that despite their differences in cultural, religious, and socio-political backgrounds, the European countries and Turkey have developed comparable perspectives and procedures regarding the representation of Muslim women in the public sphere during the historical eras compared.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Women's Studies\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"484 - 505\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Women's Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/12259276.2023.2295685\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Women's Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/12259276.2023.2295685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ABSTRACT 本研究旨在描述性地分析欧洲和土耳其关于穆斯林妇女头巾的公共辩论的异同。本研究试图回答的主要问题是:在欧洲的 9/11 事件和土耳其的 1997 年 2 月 28 日事件之后,欧洲和土耳其的头巾禁令是如何在话语上被构建和论证的?带着这个问题,我首先总结了欧洲和土耳其有关头巾的做法以及各国采取的政策。我还研究了欧洲国家和土耳其在公共话语中如何为头巾禁令辩解。研究最终表明,尽管欧洲国家和土耳其在文化、宗教和社会政治背景方面存在差异,但在所比较的历史时期,它们在穆斯林妇女在公共领域的代表权问题上形成了具有可比性的观点和程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Justification of headscarf bans in Europe and Turkey: A comparative analysis
ABSTRACT This study aims to descriptively analyze public debates in Europe and Turkey on Muslim women's head coverings in the context of similarities and differences. The main question the study attempts to answer is: How are the headscarf bans in Europe and Turkey discursively constructed and justified after 9/11 in Europe and the 28 February 1997 era in Turkey and what differences and parallels can be observed? With this question in mind, I first summarize the practices regarding the headscarf in Europe and Turkey and the policies adopted by the states. I also examine how headscarf bans are justified in public discourses in European countries and in Turkey. What the study ultimately reveals is that despite their differences in cultural, religious, and socio-political backgrounds, the European countries and Turkey have developed comparable perspectives and procedures regarding the representation of Muslim women in the public sphere during the historical eras compared.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信