颅畸形分类数据合成策略的影响

Matthias Schaufelberger, R. Kuhle, Andreas Wachter, F. Weichel, N. Hagen, Friedemann Ringwald, U. Eisenmann, Jürgen Hoffmann, M. Engel, C. Freudlsperger, Werner Nahm
{"title":"颅畸形分类数据合成策略的影响","authors":"Matthias Schaufelberger, R. Kuhle, Andreas Wachter, F. Weichel, N. Hagen, Friedemann Ringwald, U. Eisenmann, Jürgen Hoffmann, M. Engel, C. Freudlsperger, Werner Nahm","doi":"10.3389/fmedt.2023.1254690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Photogrammetric surface scans provide a radiation-free option to assess and classify craniosynostosis. Due to the low prevalence of craniosynostosis and high patient restrictions, clinical data are rare. Synthetic data could support or even replace clinical data for the classification of craniosynostosis, but this has never been studied systematically.We tested the combinations of three different synthetic data sources: a statistical shape model (SSM), a generative adversarial network (GAN), and image-based principal component analysis for a convolutional neural network (CNN)–based classification of craniosynostosis. The CNN is trained only on synthetic data but is validated and tested on clinical data.The combination of an SSM and a GAN achieved an accuracy of 0.960 and an F1 score of 0.928 on the unseen test set. The difference to training on clinical data was smaller than 0.01. Including a second image modality improved classification performance for all data sources.Without a single clinical training sample, a CNN was able to classify head deformities with similar accuracy as if it was trained on clinical data. Using multiple data sources was key for a good classification based on synthetic data alone. Synthetic data might play an important future role in the assessment of craniosynostosis.","PeriodicalId":12599,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medical Technology","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of data synthesis strategies for the classification of craniosynostosis\",\"authors\":\"Matthias Schaufelberger, R. Kuhle, Andreas Wachter, F. Weichel, N. Hagen, Friedemann Ringwald, U. Eisenmann, Jürgen Hoffmann, M. Engel, C. Freudlsperger, Werner Nahm\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmedt.2023.1254690\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Photogrammetric surface scans provide a radiation-free option to assess and classify craniosynostosis. Due to the low prevalence of craniosynostosis and high patient restrictions, clinical data are rare. Synthetic data could support or even replace clinical data for the classification of craniosynostosis, but this has never been studied systematically.We tested the combinations of three different synthetic data sources: a statistical shape model (SSM), a generative adversarial network (GAN), and image-based principal component analysis for a convolutional neural network (CNN)–based classification of craniosynostosis. The CNN is trained only on synthetic data but is validated and tested on clinical data.The combination of an SSM and a GAN achieved an accuracy of 0.960 and an F1 score of 0.928 on the unseen test set. The difference to training on clinical data was smaller than 0.01. Including a second image modality improved classification performance for all data sources.Without a single clinical training sample, a CNN was able to classify head deformities with similar accuracy as if it was trained on clinical data. Using multiple data sources was key for a good classification based on synthetic data alone. Synthetic data might play an important future role in the assessment of craniosynostosis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Medical Technology\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Medical Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2023.1254690\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medical Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2023.1254690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摄影测量表面扫描为评估和分类颅骨发育不良提供了一种无辐射选择。由于颅颧骨发育症发病率低,患者限制条件多,临床数据非常罕见。我们测试了三种不同合成数据源的组合:统计形状模型(SSM)、生成对抗网络(GAN)和基于图像的主成分分析,用于基于卷积神经网络(CNN)的颅骨发育不良分类。CNN 仅在合成数据上进行了训练,但在临床数据上进行了验证和测试。SSM 和 GAN 的组合在未见测试集上达到了 0.960 的准确率和 0.928 的 F1 分数。与在临床数据上进行的训练相比,差异小于 0.01。在没有单一临床训练样本的情况下,CNN 对头部畸形进行分类的准确率与在临床数据上进行训练的准确率相近。使用多种数据源是仅根据合成数据进行良好分类的关键。合成数据未来可能会在颅畸形的评估中发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of data synthesis strategies for the classification of craniosynostosis
Photogrammetric surface scans provide a radiation-free option to assess and classify craniosynostosis. Due to the low prevalence of craniosynostosis and high patient restrictions, clinical data are rare. Synthetic data could support or even replace clinical data for the classification of craniosynostosis, but this has never been studied systematically.We tested the combinations of three different synthetic data sources: a statistical shape model (SSM), a generative adversarial network (GAN), and image-based principal component analysis for a convolutional neural network (CNN)–based classification of craniosynostosis. The CNN is trained only on synthetic data but is validated and tested on clinical data.The combination of an SSM and a GAN achieved an accuracy of 0.960 and an F1 score of 0.928 on the unseen test set. The difference to training on clinical data was smaller than 0.01. Including a second image modality improved classification performance for all data sources.Without a single clinical training sample, a CNN was able to classify head deformities with similar accuracy as if it was trained on clinical data. Using multiple data sources was key for a good classification based on synthetic data alone. Synthetic data might play an important future role in the assessment of craniosynostosis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信