使用跨面部神经移植物和以斜方肌神经为供体神经对腕骨肌皮瓣转移进行再支配的面部复位效果比较

Hongyu Liang, Zhe Yang, N. Ma, Wei-xin Wang, Yangqun Li
{"title":"使用跨面部神经移植物和以斜方肌神经为供体神经对腕骨肌皮瓣转移进行再支配的面部复位效果比较","authors":"Hongyu Liang, Zhe Yang, N. Ma, Wei-xin Wang, Yangqun Li","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000009775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In patients with facial paralysis, the free functional gracilis muscle transfer is preferred for facial reanimation. The choice of an adequate motor nerve to innervate the transplanted gracilis muscle is one of the procedure’s key components. We present a comparative study between cross-facial nerve graft (CFNG) and masseteric nerve as donor nerves for reinnervated gracilis flap transfer in patients with complete facial paralysis. Materlals and Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on all patients with complete facial paralysis who had a free functional gracilis muscle transfer for facial reanimation between January 2014 and December 2021. Only those who received gracilis transfer reinnervated by either CFNG or masseteric nerve were included in this study. The smile excursion and lip angle were measured for evaluating the outcomes postoperatively. Results: The inclusion criteria were met by a total of 21 free functional gracilis muscle transfers, of which 11 were innervated by CFNG and 10 by the masseteric nerve. Both surgical procedures resulted in a highly considerable smile excursion of the reanimated side and postoperative improvement of static or dynamic lip angle. Masseteric nerve coaptation led to greater smile excursion and more significant improvement of dynamic lip angle than CFNG. Conclusions: For patients who have complete facial paralysis, face reanimation can be successfully accomplished by free gracilis transfer reinnervated by the CFNG or the masseteric nerve. In particular, the masseteric nerve is a reliable choice for dynamic smile reanimation.","PeriodicalId":501649,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":"42 1","pages":"172 - 176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Outcomes of Facial Reanimation Between the Use of Cross-facial Nerve Graft and the Masseteric Nerve as the Donor Nerve for Reinnervation of Gracilis Muscle Flap Transfer\",\"authors\":\"Hongyu Liang, Zhe Yang, N. Ma, Wei-xin Wang, Yangqun Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SCS.0000000000009775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: In patients with facial paralysis, the free functional gracilis muscle transfer is preferred for facial reanimation. The choice of an adequate motor nerve to innervate the transplanted gracilis muscle is one of the procedure’s key components. We present a comparative study between cross-facial nerve graft (CFNG) and masseteric nerve as donor nerves for reinnervated gracilis flap transfer in patients with complete facial paralysis. Materlals and Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on all patients with complete facial paralysis who had a free functional gracilis muscle transfer for facial reanimation between January 2014 and December 2021. Only those who received gracilis transfer reinnervated by either CFNG or masseteric nerve were included in this study. The smile excursion and lip angle were measured for evaluating the outcomes postoperatively. Results: The inclusion criteria were met by a total of 21 free functional gracilis muscle transfers, of which 11 were innervated by CFNG and 10 by the masseteric nerve. Both surgical procedures resulted in a highly considerable smile excursion of the reanimated side and postoperative improvement of static or dynamic lip angle. Masseteric nerve coaptation led to greater smile excursion and more significant improvement of dynamic lip angle than CFNG. Conclusions: For patients who have complete facial paralysis, face reanimation can be successfully accomplished by free gracilis transfer reinnervated by the CFNG or the masseteric nerve. In particular, the masseteric nerve is a reliable choice for dynamic smile reanimation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"172 - 176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000009775\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000009775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在面瘫患者中,游离功能性腓肠肌移植是面部复位的首选方法。选择合适的运动神经来支配移植的腓肠肌是手术的关键要素之一。我们对面神经移植(CFNG)和咀嚼肌神经作为供体神经用于面神经完全瘫痪患者的擒拿肌皮瓣移植进行了比较研究。材料和方法:对2014年1月至2021年12月期间接受过游离功能性腓肠肌转移面部复位术的所有完全性面瘫患者进行回顾性分析。只有接受了由CFNG或咀嚼肌神经重新支配的腓肠肌转移的患者才被纳入本研究。为评估术后效果,对微笑偏移和唇角进行了测量。研究结果共有 21 例游离功能性腓肠肌转移符合纳入标准,其中 11 例由 CFNG 神经支配,10 例由咀嚼肌神经支配。这两种手术方法都能使复位侧的微笑偏移量非常可观,术后静态或动态唇角均有所改善。与 CFNG 相比,下颌正中神经吻合术导致的微笑偏移更大,动态唇角的改善也更明显。结论:对于完全面瘫的患者,可以通过游离腓肠肌转移再支配CFNG或咀嚼肌神经成功实现面部复位。尤其是,咀嚼肌神经是动态微笑再造的可靠选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Outcomes of Facial Reanimation Between the Use of Cross-facial Nerve Graft and the Masseteric Nerve as the Donor Nerve for Reinnervation of Gracilis Muscle Flap Transfer
Background: In patients with facial paralysis, the free functional gracilis muscle transfer is preferred for facial reanimation. The choice of an adequate motor nerve to innervate the transplanted gracilis muscle is one of the procedure’s key components. We present a comparative study between cross-facial nerve graft (CFNG) and masseteric nerve as donor nerves for reinnervated gracilis flap transfer in patients with complete facial paralysis. Materlals and Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on all patients with complete facial paralysis who had a free functional gracilis muscle transfer for facial reanimation between January 2014 and December 2021. Only those who received gracilis transfer reinnervated by either CFNG or masseteric nerve were included in this study. The smile excursion and lip angle were measured for evaluating the outcomes postoperatively. Results: The inclusion criteria were met by a total of 21 free functional gracilis muscle transfers, of which 11 were innervated by CFNG and 10 by the masseteric nerve. Both surgical procedures resulted in a highly considerable smile excursion of the reanimated side and postoperative improvement of static or dynamic lip angle. Masseteric nerve coaptation led to greater smile excursion and more significant improvement of dynamic lip angle than CFNG. Conclusions: For patients who have complete facial paralysis, face reanimation can be successfully accomplished by free gracilis transfer reinnervated by the CFNG or the masseteric nerve. In particular, the masseteric nerve is a reliable choice for dynamic smile reanimation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信