对常年哲学和基督教教育管理的可持续反思

Sandro Apriedo, Listia Septiana, Callista Anugrahani, Obertina Gomor, Silipta
{"title":"对常年哲学和基督教教育管理的可持续反思","authors":"Sandro Apriedo, Listia Septiana, Callista Anugrahani, Obertina Gomor, Silipta","doi":"10.58526/jsret.v2i4.274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The background of this research is the authors' anxiety in the midst of accelerating times in the education space as if to announce that the old educational values are outdated and irrelevant values. This thoughts are more to the prioritization of constructive philosophy, or something that is deconstructed. Meanwhile, the context of education cannot be universalized into one even though the regulations in education in a country cover the whole. Old values are meaningful and timeless values that are timeless. This kind of thinking is a thought that departs from the philosophy of perennialism. This is qualitative research with data search through data sourced from journals as previous research as a secondary source. Results show that the philosophy of perennialism here serves as an analytical and differentiating tool to look back at the philosophy of constructionism as a criticism as well as a realization for the world of education in the form of the importance of maintaining existing or embedded values so far.","PeriodicalId":113492,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scientific Research, Education, and Technology (JSRET)","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainable Reflexivities on Perennial Philosophy and Christian Education Management\",\"authors\":\"Sandro Apriedo, Listia Septiana, Callista Anugrahani, Obertina Gomor, Silipta\",\"doi\":\"10.58526/jsret.v2i4.274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The background of this research is the authors' anxiety in the midst of accelerating times in the education space as if to announce that the old educational values are outdated and irrelevant values. This thoughts are more to the prioritization of constructive philosophy, or something that is deconstructed. Meanwhile, the context of education cannot be universalized into one even though the regulations in education in a country cover the whole. Old values are meaningful and timeless values that are timeless. This kind of thinking is a thought that departs from the philosophy of perennialism. This is qualitative research with data search through data sourced from journals as previous research as a secondary source. Results show that the philosophy of perennialism here serves as an analytical and differentiating tool to look back at the philosophy of constructionism as a criticism as well as a realization for the world of education in the form of the importance of maintaining existing or embedded values so far.\",\"PeriodicalId\":113492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Scientific Research, Education, and Technology (JSRET)\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Scientific Research, Education, and Technology (JSRET)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58526/jsret.v2i4.274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scientific Research, Education, and Technology (JSRET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58526/jsret.v2i4.274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究的背景是作者在教育领域加速发展的时代背景下的焦虑,仿佛在宣告旧的教育价值观已经过时,是不相干的价值观。这种思考更多的是建构性哲学的优先性,或者说是解构性的东西。同时,即使一个国家的教育法规覆盖了整个国家,教育的背景也不能被普遍化。旧的价值观是有意义的、永恒的价值观,是永恒的。这种思想是一种背离永恒主义哲学的思想。这是一项定性研究,通过从期刊上获取的数据进行数据搜索,作为以往研究的第二手资料。研究结果表明,常年主义哲学在这里起到了分析和区分的作用,它既是对建构主义哲学的一种批判,也是对教育界的一种觉悟,即迄今为止保持现有的或内含的价值观的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sustainable Reflexivities on Perennial Philosophy and Christian Education Management
The background of this research is the authors' anxiety in the midst of accelerating times in the education space as if to announce that the old educational values are outdated and irrelevant values. This thoughts are more to the prioritization of constructive philosophy, or something that is deconstructed. Meanwhile, the context of education cannot be universalized into one even though the regulations in education in a country cover the whole. Old values are meaningful and timeless values that are timeless. This kind of thinking is a thought that departs from the philosophy of perennialism. This is qualitative research with data search through data sourced from journals as previous research as a secondary source. Results show that the philosophy of perennialism here serves as an analytical and differentiating tool to look back at the philosophy of constructionism as a criticism as well as a realization for the world of education in the form of the importance of maintaining existing or embedded values so far.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信