采用切削运移指数、切削运移率和环空切削浓度法对水平井G油田S井进行切削分析

Q4 Earth and Planetary Sciences
A. R. R. Wastu, R. Husla, Ghanima Yasmaniar, P. S. Yulia, S. Samsol, O. Ridaliani
{"title":"采用切削运移指数、切削运移率和环空切削浓度法对水平井G油田S井进行切削分析","authors":"A. R. R. Wastu, R. Husla, Ghanima Yasmaniar, P. S. Yulia, S. Samsol, O. Ridaliani","doi":"10.11113/aej.v13.20028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The basic principle of the drilling operation is to grind the rock formations with bits which will later become drill cuttings. In this process, fluid is needed as a conveying medium, commonly known as drilling mud, because the deeper the drilling, the more drill flakes are produced. One of the prominent functions of drilling mud is lifting the drill shale up to surface. The purpose of this analysis is to quantitatively prove whether the cutting has been successfully lifted to the surface or not, and to determine the elements of the fluid’s physical properties and the drilling mud fluid’s rheology. This analysis was carried out using three methods including; the cutting carry index, which the value required is greater than one; the cutting transport ratio, which the value required is greater than 50%; and the cutting concentration in annulus, which the value required is less than 5%. If the value of the quantitative calculation already has a value above the standard, it can be concluded that the drill cuttings can be lifted optimally. The value of the cutting carry index has to be greater than one, because if it is less than one the solid value in the mud is still lacking, causing a low density so it will affect the carrying capacity of cutting in 1 gal of mud. The value of cutting concentration in annulus should not be more than 5, it is feared that if it exceeds this limit, it can affect the rate of penetration and can cause a stuck. As for the value of the cutting transport ratio should not be less than 50% because if it is less than that the hydrostatic pressure below will be large and can cause formation fractures. In this case, we will discuss the analysis of cutting removal on the 8.5 inch route at 4290 to 5174 ft depth, with a slope of 66.29o from the starting point of the borehole.","PeriodicalId":36749,"journal":{"name":"ASEAN Engineering Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CUTTING ANALYSIS ON HORIZONTAL DRIILING USING CUTTING CARRY INDEX, CUTTING TRANSPORT RATIO AND CUTTING CONCENTRATION IN ANNULUS METHOD ON A WELL G FIELD S\",\"authors\":\"A. R. R. Wastu, R. Husla, Ghanima Yasmaniar, P. S. Yulia, S. Samsol, O. Ridaliani\",\"doi\":\"10.11113/aej.v13.20028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The basic principle of the drilling operation is to grind the rock formations with bits which will later become drill cuttings. In this process, fluid is needed as a conveying medium, commonly known as drilling mud, because the deeper the drilling, the more drill flakes are produced. One of the prominent functions of drilling mud is lifting the drill shale up to surface. The purpose of this analysis is to quantitatively prove whether the cutting has been successfully lifted to the surface or not, and to determine the elements of the fluid’s physical properties and the drilling mud fluid’s rheology. This analysis was carried out using three methods including; the cutting carry index, which the value required is greater than one; the cutting transport ratio, which the value required is greater than 50%; and the cutting concentration in annulus, which the value required is less than 5%. If the value of the quantitative calculation already has a value above the standard, it can be concluded that the drill cuttings can be lifted optimally. The value of the cutting carry index has to be greater than one, because if it is less than one the solid value in the mud is still lacking, causing a low density so it will affect the carrying capacity of cutting in 1 gal of mud. The value of cutting concentration in annulus should not be more than 5, it is feared that if it exceeds this limit, it can affect the rate of penetration and can cause a stuck. As for the value of the cutting transport ratio should not be less than 50% because if it is less than that the hydrostatic pressure below will be large and can cause formation fractures. In this case, we will discuss the analysis of cutting removal on the 8.5 inch route at 4290 to 5174 ft depth, with a slope of 66.29o from the starting point of the borehole.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASEAN Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASEAN Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11113/aej.v13.20028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASEAN Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11113/aej.v13.20028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

钻井作业的基本原理是用钻头研磨岩层,这些钻头随后会成为钻屑。在这个过程中,需要液体作为输送介质,也就是通常所说的钻井泥浆,因为钻孔越深,产生的钻屑就越多。钻井泥浆的主要功能之一就是将钻屑提升到地表。本分析的目的是定量证明切削是否成功提升到地表,并确定流体物理性质和钻井泥浆流变学的要素。该分析采用三种方法,包括:切削携带指数,其值要求大于 1;切削运移率,其值要求大于 50%;以及环空切削浓度,其值要求小于 5%。如果定量计算值已经高于标准值,则可以断定钻屑可以得到最佳提升。切削携带指数的值必须大于 1,因为如果小于 1,泥浆中的固体值仍然不足,导致密度较低,因此会影响 1 gal 泥浆的切削携带能力。环空的切削浓度值不应大于 5,如果超过这个限度,恐怕会影响穿透率并造成卡死。至于切削运移率的数值,则不应小于 50%,因为如果小于 50%,下面的静水压力就会很大,会造成地层破裂。在本案例中,我们将讨论在井深 4290 至 5174 英尺处的 8.5 英寸路线上的切削运移分析,井眼起点的斜度为 66.29o。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CUTTING ANALYSIS ON HORIZONTAL DRIILING USING CUTTING CARRY INDEX, CUTTING TRANSPORT RATIO AND CUTTING CONCENTRATION IN ANNULUS METHOD ON A WELL G FIELD S
The basic principle of the drilling operation is to grind the rock formations with bits which will later become drill cuttings. In this process, fluid is needed as a conveying medium, commonly known as drilling mud, because the deeper the drilling, the more drill flakes are produced. One of the prominent functions of drilling mud is lifting the drill shale up to surface. The purpose of this analysis is to quantitatively prove whether the cutting has been successfully lifted to the surface or not, and to determine the elements of the fluid’s physical properties and the drilling mud fluid’s rheology. This analysis was carried out using three methods including; the cutting carry index, which the value required is greater than one; the cutting transport ratio, which the value required is greater than 50%; and the cutting concentration in annulus, which the value required is less than 5%. If the value of the quantitative calculation already has a value above the standard, it can be concluded that the drill cuttings can be lifted optimally. The value of the cutting carry index has to be greater than one, because if it is less than one the solid value in the mud is still lacking, causing a low density so it will affect the carrying capacity of cutting in 1 gal of mud. The value of cutting concentration in annulus should not be more than 5, it is feared that if it exceeds this limit, it can affect the rate of penetration and can cause a stuck. As for the value of the cutting transport ratio should not be less than 50% because if it is less than that the hydrostatic pressure below will be large and can cause formation fractures. In this case, we will discuss the analysis of cutting removal on the 8.5 inch route at 4290 to 5174 ft depth, with a slope of 66.29o from the starting point of the borehole.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ASEAN Engineering Journal
ASEAN Engineering Journal Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信