分析鹅日粮中燕麦和苜蓿的生物活性化合物对鹅肉营养价值的影响

Daniil Maiboroda, O. Danchenko
{"title":"分析鹅日粮中燕麦和苜蓿的生物活性化合物对鹅肉营养价值的影响","authors":"Daniil Maiboroda, O. Danchenko","doi":"10.15587/2706-5448.2023.289711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The feasibility of introducing a mixture of oats (Avena Sativa) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa) into the diet of Legart geese was studied in order to improve the quality of the obtained meat of this bird both after slaughter and after long-term low-temperature storage by increasing its antioxidant activity. The paper analyzes and substantiates the use of oat and alfalfa admixtures in the diet of geese. As a result of the study, it was established that the addition of oats (experimental group I) and a mixture of oats and alfalfa (experimental group II) to the diet of geese contributed to a decrease in the content of the end products of lipid peroxidation (LPO) in breast meat after slaughter and during its long-term low-temperature storage (90 days). In the goose meat of both research groups, the prooxidant-antioxidant balance period was prolonged up to the 23rd day. The biggest difference in the LPO content products in the meat of the control and both experimental groups was recorded on the 45th day of meat storage. For the meat of the I research group, this difference was 29.2 %, for the II research group – 41.2 %. The LPO maximum intensity processes in the meat of geese of both experimental groups was established from the 45th to the 67th day of storage. During this time, the content of LPO products increased by 62.5 % in the meat of the geese of the I research group, and by 88.7 % in the II. By the 67th day, the content of LPO products in the meat of the control group significantly exceeded the corresponding indicators of the experimental groups. At the end of the experiment, the content of LPO products in the meat of geese of the control and experimental groups did not reliably differ. Analysis of the fatty acid composition of goose breast meat showed that the most positive changes occurred in the goose meat of the II research group. At the beginning of the storage period, the meat of this group showed an increased content of essential fatty acids: linoleic (18:2) by 11.4 %, linolenic (18:3) by 25.8 %, and arachidonic (20:4) by 12.4 %. The total content of ω6-fatty acids in the meat of this group was 10.9 % higher than that of the control group. However, on the 90th day of storage, there was no significant difference in the content of essential fatty acids in the meat of geese of II experimental and control groups of geese.","PeriodicalId":22480,"journal":{"name":"Technology audit and production reserves","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the effect of biologically active compounds of oats and alfalfa in the diet of geese on the nutritional value of goose meat\",\"authors\":\"Daniil Maiboroda, O. Danchenko\",\"doi\":\"10.15587/2706-5448.2023.289711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The feasibility of introducing a mixture of oats (Avena Sativa) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa) into the diet of Legart geese was studied in order to improve the quality of the obtained meat of this bird both after slaughter and after long-term low-temperature storage by increasing its antioxidant activity. The paper analyzes and substantiates the use of oat and alfalfa admixtures in the diet of geese. As a result of the study, it was established that the addition of oats (experimental group I) and a mixture of oats and alfalfa (experimental group II) to the diet of geese contributed to a decrease in the content of the end products of lipid peroxidation (LPO) in breast meat after slaughter and during its long-term low-temperature storage (90 days). In the goose meat of both research groups, the prooxidant-antioxidant balance period was prolonged up to the 23rd day. The biggest difference in the LPO content products in the meat of the control and both experimental groups was recorded on the 45th day of meat storage. For the meat of the I research group, this difference was 29.2 %, for the II research group – 41.2 %. The LPO maximum intensity processes in the meat of geese of both experimental groups was established from the 45th to the 67th day of storage. During this time, the content of LPO products increased by 62.5 % in the meat of the geese of the I research group, and by 88.7 % in the II. By the 67th day, the content of LPO products in the meat of the control group significantly exceeded the corresponding indicators of the experimental groups. At the end of the experiment, the content of LPO products in the meat of geese of the control and experimental groups did not reliably differ. Analysis of the fatty acid composition of goose breast meat showed that the most positive changes occurred in the goose meat of the II research group. At the beginning of the storage period, the meat of this group showed an increased content of essential fatty acids: linoleic (18:2) by 11.4 %, linolenic (18:3) by 25.8 %, and arachidonic (20:4) by 12.4 %. The total content of ω6-fatty acids in the meat of this group was 10.9 % higher than that of the control group. However, on the 90th day of storage, there was no significant difference in the content of essential fatty acids in the meat of geese of II experimental and control groups of geese.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology audit and production reserves\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology audit and production reserves\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2023.289711\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology audit and production reserves","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2023.289711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了在勒加特鹅的日粮中添加燕麦(Avena Sativa)和紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa)混合物的可行性,目的是通过提高鹅肉的抗氧化活性,改善鹅宰杀后和长期低温贮藏后的肉质。论文分析并证实了在鹅日粮中使用燕麦和苜蓿混合物的可行性。研究结果表明,在鹅的日粮中添加燕麦(实验组 I)以及燕麦和苜蓿混合物(实验组 II)有助于降低鹅屠宰后和长期低温贮藏(90 天)期间胸脯肉中脂质过氧化最终产物(LPO)的含量。在两个研究小组的鹅肉中,原氧化剂-抗氧化剂的平衡期延长至第23天。对照组和两个实验组鹅肉中 LPO 含量产品的最大差异出现在贮藏的第 45 天。第一研究组肉类的这一差异为 29.2%,第二研究组为 41.2%。两个实验组鹅肉中 LPO 的最大强度过程都是在贮藏的第 45 天到第 67 天。在此期间,Ⅰ研究组鹅肉中的 LPO 产物含量增加了 62.5%,Ⅱ研究组增加了 88.7%。到第 67 天,对照组鹅肉中的 LPO 产物含量明显超过了实验组的相应指标。实验结束时,对照组和实验组鹅肉中 LPO 产物的含量没有明显差异。对鹅胸脯肉脂肪酸组成的分析表明,II 研究组的鹅肉发生了最积极的变化。在贮藏初期,该研究组的鹅肉显示出必需脂肪酸含量的增加:亚油酸(18:2)增加了 11.4%,亚麻酸(18:3)增加了 25.8%,花生四烯酸(20:4)增加了 12.4%。该组肉中ω6脂肪酸的总含量比对照组高10.9%。然而,在储存的第 90 天,II 试验组和对照组鹅肉中必需脂肪酸的含量没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of the effect of biologically active compounds of oats and alfalfa in the diet of geese on the nutritional value of goose meat
The feasibility of introducing a mixture of oats (Avena Sativa) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa) into the diet of Legart geese was studied in order to improve the quality of the obtained meat of this bird both after slaughter and after long-term low-temperature storage by increasing its antioxidant activity. The paper analyzes and substantiates the use of oat and alfalfa admixtures in the diet of geese. As a result of the study, it was established that the addition of oats (experimental group I) and a mixture of oats and alfalfa (experimental group II) to the diet of geese contributed to a decrease in the content of the end products of lipid peroxidation (LPO) in breast meat after slaughter and during its long-term low-temperature storage (90 days). In the goose meat of both research groups, the prooxidant-antioxidant balance period was prolonged up to the 23rd day. The biggest difference in the LPO content products in the meat of the control and both experimental groups was recorded on the 45th day of meat storage. For the meat of the I research group, this difference was 29.2 %, for the II research group – 41.2 %. The LPO maximum intensity processes in the meat of geese of both experimental groups was established from the 45th to the 67th day of storage. During this time, the content of LPO products increased by 62.5 % in the meat of the geese of the I research group, and by 88.7 % in the II. By the 67th day, the content of LPO products in the meat of the control group significantly exceeded the corresponding indicators of the experimental groups. At the end of the experiment, the content of LPO products in the meat of geese of the control and experimental groups did not reliably differ. Analysis of the fatty acid composition of goose breast meat showed that the most positive changes occurred in the goose meat of the II research group. At the beginning of the storage period, the meat of this group showed an increased content of essential fatty acids: linoleic (18:2) by 11.4 %, linolenic (18:3) by 25.8 %, and arachidonic (20:4) by 12.4 %. The total content of ω6-fatty acids in the meat of this group was 10.9 % higher than that of the control group. However, on the 90th day of storage, there was no significant difference in the content of essential fatty acids in the meat of geese of II experimental and control groups of geese.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信