互联网的使用会影响公众的风险意识吗?- 从政治参与的角度看

{"title":"互联网的使用会影响公众的风险意识吗?- 从政治参与的角度看","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.dim.2023.100059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Internet use has resulted in the flow and interweaving of risks and increased the difficulty of risk governance. Strengthening public risk perception research can not only make up for the shortcomings of traditional government-centered risk governance research but also improve the ability of risk governance. By employing data from Chinese Social Survey (CSS) and the mediating test with the process plug-in in SPSS, this paper tries to explore the influence mechanism of Internet use on public risk perception, as well as the mediating effect of different types of political participation. The results show that Internet use has a significantly positive impact on comprehensive public risk perception. Network political participation has significantly enhanced the public risk perception, while traditional political participation has significantly reduced the public risk perception. Besides, network political participation plays a mediating role in the relationship between Internet use and public risk perception.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72769,"journal":{"name":"Data and information management","volume":"8 3","pages":"Article 100059"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2543925123000335/pdfft?md5=963a1f5301e23f6905ef0c6d6fe962ed&pid=1-s2.0-S2543925123000335-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does internet use affect public risk perception? — From the perspective of political participation\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dim.2023.100059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Internet use has resulted in the flow and interweaving of risks and increased the difficulty of risk governance. Strengthening public risk perception research can not only make up for the shortcomings of traditional government-centered risk governance research but also improve the ability of risk governance. By employing data from Chinese Social Survey (CSS) and the mediating test with the process plug-in in SPSS, this paper tries to explore the influence mechanism of Internet use on public risk perception, as well as the mediating effect of different types of political participation. The results show that Internet use has a significantly positive impact on comprehensive public risk perception. Network political participation has significantly enhanced the public risk perception, while traditional political participation has significantly reduced the public risk perception. Besides, network political participation plays a mediating role in the relationship between Internet use and public risk perception.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Data and information management\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100059\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2543925123000335/pdfft?md5=963a1f5301e23f6905ef0c6d6fe962ed&pid=1-s2.0-S2543925123000335-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Data and information management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2543925123000335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data and information management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2543925123000335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

互联网的使用导致了风险的流动和交织,增加了风险治理的难度。加强公众风险认知研究,不仅可以弥补传统的以政府为中心的风险治理研究的不足,还可以提高风险治理的能力。本文运用中国社会调查(CSS)数据,利用 SPSS 中的过程插件进行中介检验,试图探讨互联网使用对公众风险认知的影响机制,以及不同类型政治参与的中介效应。结果表明,互联网使用对公众综合风险感知有显著的正向影响。网络政治参与明显增强了公众风险感知,而传统政治参与则明显降低了公众风险感知。此外,网络政治参与在互联网使用与公众风险感知的关系中发挥着中介作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does internet use affect public risk perception? — From the perspective of political participation

Internet use has resulted in the flow and interweaving of risks and increased the difficulty of risk governance. Strengthening public risk perception research can not only make up for the shortcomings of traditional government-centered risk governance research but also improve the ability of risk governance. By employing data from Chinese Social Survey (CSS) and the mediating test with the process plug-in in SPSS, this paper tries to explore the influence mechanism of Internet use on public risk perception, as well as the mediating effect of different types of political participation. The results show that Internet use has a significantly positive impact on comprehensive public risk perception. Network political participation has significantly enhanced the public risk perception, while traditional political participation has significantly reduced the public risk perception. Besides, network political participation plays a mediating role in the relationship between Internet use and public risk perception.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Data and information management
Data and information management Management Information Systems, Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
55 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信