{"title":"信仰与此有关吗？","authors":"Sebastian Gäb","doi":"10.1515/nzsth-2023-0061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper argues that even Crane’s modified account of belief doesn’t do justice to all varieties of religious belief. Particularly beliefs associated with ritual behavior don’t seem to match the criteria of Crane’s alternative account. So, the question remains whether these beliefs should still be called beliefs, or whether the standard model of belief is even more false than Crane suspects.","PeriodicalId":507522,"journal":{"name":"Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie","volume":"89 1","pages":"430 - 437"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What’s Belief Got to Do With It?\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Gäb\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/nzsth-2023-0061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper argues that even Crane’s modified account of belief doesn’t do justice to all varieties of religious belief. Particularly beliefs associated with ritual behavior don’t seem to match the criteria of Crane’s alternative account. So, the question remains whether these beliefs should still be called beliefs, or whether the standard model of belief is even more false than Crane suspects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"430 - 437\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/nzsth-2023-0061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/nzsth-2023-0061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract This paper argues that even Crane’s modified account of belief doesn’t do justice to all varieties of religious belief. Particularly beliefs associated with ritual behavior don’t seem to match the criteria of Crane’s alternative account. So, the question remains whether these beliefs should still be called beliefs, or whether the standard model of belief is even more false than Crane suspects.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
