摘要 16 - 我们是否对脊柱关节炎 (SpA) 进行了靶向治疗?来自亚太风湿病学协会联盟 SpA 登记处的一年分析

Isaac T Cheng, Ho So, Carson CY Yip, YING-YING Leung, Kichul Shin, Muhammad Ahmed Saeed, P. Chiowchanwisawakit, M. Hammoudeh, Muhammad Haroon, S. Nallasivan, S. Angkodjojo, James Ho Yin Chung, Mitsumasa Kishimoto, James Wei, L. Tam
{"title":"摘要 16 - 我们是否对脊柱关节炎 (SpA) 进行了靶向治疗?来自亚太风湿病学协会联盟 SpA 登记处的一年分析","authors":"Isaac T Cheng, Ho So, Carson CY Yip, YING-YING Leung, Kichul Shin, Muhammad Ahmed Saeed, P. Chiowchanwisawakit, M. Hammoudeh, Muhammad Haroon, S. Nallasivan, S. Angkodjojo, James Ho Yin Chung, Mitsumasa Kishimoto, James Wei, L. Tam","doi":"10.1142/s2661341723740322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background This analysis aimed to evaluate the extent of treat-to-target (T2T) achievement after 1-year intensive treatment in patients enrolled to the APLAR SpA registry. Methods Patients who fulfilled the CASPAR2006 for psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and 2009ASAS criteria for axial spondylitis (AxSpA) were recruited. Current analysis included the first 143 patients reaching the 1-year timepoint across 7 Asia-Pacific regions (Hong Kong, Singapore, Korea, India, Pakistan, Qatar and Thailand). Results 79 patients with PsA(age: 52±13 years, 43(55%) male, disease duration: 8.0±8.3 years) and 64 patients with AxSpA (age:41±16 years, 48(75%) male, disease duration: 4.8±7.2 years) were included. There were significant improvement in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) (22.1±14.4 at baseline vs 11.5±10.0 at 1-year, p<0.001) while Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) remained stable. Other characteristics are listed in Table 1. Concerning the medication use, there was an increase in the number of patients receiving biologic/target synthetic disease-modifying drug (b/tsDMARDS, 29% at baseline to 61% at 1-year for PsA, and 52% at baseline to 64% at 1-year for AxSpA) (Fig. 1). Regarding T2T, 62% and 45% of PsA patient achieved DAPSA-low disease activity (DAPSA-LDA) and minimal disease activity (MDA) respectively, while 53% of patients with Axial SpA achieved ASDAS-LDA. The use of b/tsDMARDs was significantly higher in patient who achieved MDA when compared to those who did not (Fig. 1). The MDA/ASDAS-LDA achievement rate were comparable to that of the tight control arm of TICOPA cohort (41%) or TICOSPA study (60%) respectively. Treatment was escalated in 86% of visits when treatment target was not met. The reason for non-escalation of drug included: patients’choice (42%), mild symptoms only and physician decides to keep current regime (27%), adverse events (19%), no viable alternatives (8%) and others (4%). Conclusions Implementing the T2T strategy in patient with SpA was feasible in selected centres from the APLAR region, with similar target achievement rate compared to T2T studies conducted in Europe.","PeriodicalId":15538,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Immunology","volume":"179 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract 16 — Are We Treating-to-Target on Spondyloarthritis (SpA)? A One-Year Analysis from the Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology (APLAR) SpA Registry\",\"authors\":\"Isaac T Cheng, Ho So, Carson CY Yip, YING-YING Leung, Kichul Shin, Muhammad Ahmed Saeed, P. Chiowchanwisawakit, M. Hammoudeh, Muhammad Haroon, S. Nallasivan, S. Angkodjojo, James Ho Yin Chung, Mitsumasa Kishimoto, James Wei, L. Tam\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s2661341723740322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background This analysis aimed to evaluate the extent of treat-to-target (T2T) achievement after 1-year intensive treatment in patients enrolled to the APLAR SpA registry. Methods Patients who fulfilled the CASPAR2006 for psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and 2009ASAS criteria for axial spondylitis (AxSpA) were recruited. Current analysis included the first 143 patients reaching the 1-year timepoint across 7 Asia-Pacific regions (Hong Kong, Singapore, Korea, India, Pakistan, Qatar and Thailand). Results 79 patients with PsA(age: 52±13 years, 43(55%) male, disease duration: 8.0±8.3 years) and 64 patients with AxSpA (age:41±16 years, 48(75%) male, disease duration: 4.8±7.2 years) were included. There were significant improvement in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) (22.1±14.4 at baseline vs 11.5±10.0 at 1-year, p<0.001) while Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) remained stable. Other characteristics are listed in Table 1. Concerning the medication use, there was an increase in the number of patients receiving biologic/target synthetic disease-modifying drug (b/tsDMARDS, 29% at baseline to 61% at 1-year for PsA, and 52% at baseline to 64% at 1-year for AxSpA) (Fig. 1). Regarding T2T, 62% and 45% of PsA patient achieved DAPSA-low disease activity (DAPSA-LDA) and minimal disease activity (MDA) respectively, while 53% of patients with Axial SpA achieved ASDAS-LDA. The use of b/tsDMARDs was significantly higher in patient who achieved MDA when compared to those who did not (Fig. 1). The MDA/ASDAS-LDA achievement rate were comparable to that of the tight control arm of TICOPA cohort (41%) or TICOSPA study (60%) respectively. Treatment was escalated in 86% of visits when treatment target was not met. The reason for non-escalation of drug included: patients’choice (42%), mild symptoms only and physician decides to keep current regime (27%), adverse events (19%), no viable alternatives (8%) and others (4%). Conclusions Implementing the T2T strategy in patient with SpA was feasible in selected centres from the APLAR region, with similar target achievement rate compared to T2T studies conducted in Europe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Immunology\",\"volume\":\"179 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2661341723740322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2661341723740322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 本分析旨在评估 APLAR SpA 登记患者经过 1 年强化治疗后达到治疗目标 (T2T) 的程度。方法 招募符合 CASPAR2006 银屑病关节炎(PsA)标准和 2009ASAS 轴性脊柱炎(AxSpA)标准的患者。目前的分析包括 7 个亚太地区(香港、新加坡、韩国、印度、巴基斯坦、卡塔尔和泰国)首批达到 1 年时间点的 143 名患者。结果 79 名 PsA 患者(年龄:52±13 岁,43(55%)名男性,病程:8.0±8.3 年)和 64 名 AxSpA 患者(年龄:41±16 岁,48(75%)名男性,病程:4.8±7.2 年):年龄:41±16 岁,48(75%)名男性,病程:4.8±7.2 年)和 64 名 AxSpA 患者。银屑病关节炎疾病活动度(DAPSA)明显改善(基线时为 22.1±14.4 vs 1 年后为 11.5±10.0,P<0.001),而强直性脊柱炎疾病活动度评分(ASDAS)保持稳定。其他特征见表 1。在药物使用方面,接受生物制剂/靶向合成疾病修饰药物(b/tsDMARDS,PsA 从基线时的 29% 增加到 1 年后的 61%,AxSpA 从基线时的 52% 增加到 1 年后的 64%)治疗的患者人数有所增加(图 1)。关于T2T,分别有62%和45%的PsA患者达到了DAPSA-低疾病活动度(DAPSA-LDA)和最小疾病活动度(MDA),而53%的轴性SpA患者达到了ASDAS-LDA。与未达到 MDA 的患者相比,达到 MDA 的患者使用 b/tsDMARDs 的比例明显更高(图 1)。MDA/ASDAS-LDA达标率分别与TICOPA队列的严格对照组(41%)或TICOSPA研究的严格对照组(60%)相当。在未达到治疗目标的情况下,有 86% 的患者接受了升级治疗。未升级用药的原因包括:患者的选择(42%)、仅有轻微症状且医生决定保持当前治疗方案(27%)、不良事件(19%)、无可行替代方案(8%)及其他(4%)。结论 在APLAR地区的部分中心对SpA患者实施T2T策略是可行的,与欧洲进行的T2T研究相比,目标实现率相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abstract 16 — Are We Treating-to-Target on Spondyloarthritis (SpA)? A One-Year Analysis from the Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology (APLAR) SpA Registry
Background This analysis aimed to evaluate the extent of treat-to-target (T2T) achievement after 1-year intensive treatment in patients enrolled to the APLAR SpA registry. Methods Patients who fulfilled the CASPAR2006 for psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and 2009ASAS criteria for axial spondylitis (AxSpA) were recruited. Current analysis included the first 143 patients reaching the 1-year timepoint across 7 Asia-Pacific regions (Hong Kong, Singapore, Korea, India, Pakistan, Qatar and Thailand). Results 79 patients with PsA(age: 52±13 years, 43(55%) male, disease duration: 8.0±8.3 years) and 64 patients with AxSpA (age:41±16 years, 48(75%) male, disease duration: 4.8±7.2 years) were included. There were significant improvement in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) (22.1±14.4 at baseline vs 11.5±10.0 at 1-year, p<0.001) while Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) remained stable. Other characteristics are listed in Table 1. Concerning the medication use, there was an increase in the number of patients receiving biologic/target synthetic disease-modifying drug (b/tsDMARDS, 29% at baseline to 61% at 1-year for PsA, and 52% at baseline to 64% at 1-year for AxSpA) (Fig. 1). Regarding T2T, 62% and 45% of PsA patient achieved DAPSA-low disease activity (DAPSA-LDA) and minimal disease activity (MDA) respectively, while 53% of patients with Axial SpA achieved ASDAS-LDA. The use of b/tsDMARDs was significantly higher in patient who achieved MDA when compared to those who did not (Fig. 1). The MDA/ASDAS-LDA achievement rate were comparable to that of the tight control arm of TICOPA cohort (41%) or TICOSPA study (60%) respectively. Treatment was escalated in 86% of visits when treatment target was not met. The reason for non-escalation of drug included: patients’choice (42%), mild symptoms only and physician decides to keep current regime (27%), adverse events (19%), no viable alternatives (8%) and others (4%). Conclusions Implementing the T2T strategy in patient with SpA was feasible in selected centres from the APLAR region, with similar target achievement rate compared to T2T studies conducted in Europe.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信