丹绒查蓬巴拉县 Senyerang 分区 Teluk Ketapang 村椰农的生活汇率与福利

Nida Kemala, Kholik Maulana
{"title":"丹绒查蓬巴拉县 Senyerang 分区 Teluk Ketapang 村椰农的生活汇率与福利","authors":"Nida Kemala, Kholik Maulana","doi":"10.33087/mea.v8i2.188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was carried out in Teluk Ketapang Village, Senyerang District, Tanjung Jabung Barat. It  used a survey method which the number of samples taken  were 37 farmers. The aimed of this reseach were  to describe the  coconut farming, to analyze the subsistence exchange rate of the  and to know the welfare of coconut.  This study informed that the planting was done   of 9x9x9 meters as a distance . Farmers applied  fertilization (NPK and Urea) and sprayed with herbicides ( gramaxone and round-up), The collecting coconut products were sold to middlemens. The Subsistence Exchange Rate was 0.70 (0.70 < 1), and  it means that the revenue of coconut farming was not enough to meet the total expenditure costs of the farmers (both for input of coconut farming and consumtion expenditure).  So it can be classified as unwelfare.","PeriodicalId":428280,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal MeA (Media Agribisnis)","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nilai Tukar Subsisten Dan Kesejahteraan Petani Kelapa di Desa Teluk Ketapang Kecamatan Senyerang Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Barat\",\"authors\":\"Nida Kemala, Kholik Maulana\",\"doi\":\"10.33087/mea.v8i2.188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study was carried out in Teluk Ketapang Village, Senyerang District, Tanjung Jabung Barat. It  used a survey method which the number of samples taken  were 37 farmers. The aimed of this reseach were  to describe the  coconut farming, to analyze the subsistence exchange rate of the  and to know the welfare of coconut.  This study informed that the planting was done   of 9x9x9 meters as a distance . Farmers applied  fertilization (NPK and Urea) and sprayed with herbicides ( gramaxone and round-up), The collecting coconut products were sold to middlemens. The Subsistence Exchange Rate was 0.70 (0.70 < 1), and  it means that the revenue of coconut farming was not enough to meet the total expenditure costs of the farmers (both for input of coconut farming and consumtion expenditure).  So it can be classified as unwelfare.\",\"PeriodicalId\":428280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal MeA (Media Agribisnis)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal MeA (Media Agribisnis)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33087/mea.v8i2.188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal MeA (Media Agribisnis)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33087/mea.v8i2.188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究在丹绒查蓬巴拉特省森耶朗地区的特鲁克凯塔邦村进行。研究采用调查法,抽取了 37 个农民样本。这项研究的目的是描述椰子种植情况,分析椰子的生计汇率,并了解椰子的福利。 这项研究表明,种植距离为 9x9x9 米。农民施肥(氮磷钾和尿素)并喷洒除草剂(克无踪和round-up),收集的椰子产品出售给中间商。生计汇率为 0.70(0.70 < 1),这意味着椰子种植的收入不足以支付农民的总支出(包括椰子种植的投入和消费支出)。 因此,可将其归类为无福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nilai Tukar Subsisten Dan Kesejahteraan Petani Kelapa di Desa Teluk Ketapang Kecamatan Senyerang Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Barat
This study was carried out in Teluk Ketapang Village, Senyerang District, Tanjung Jabung Barat. It  used a survey method which the number of samples taken  were 37 farmers. The aimed of this reseach were  to describe the  coconut farming, to analyze the subsistence exchange rate of the  and to know the welfare of coconut.  This study informed that the planting was done   of 9x9x9 meters as a distance . Farmers applied  fertilization (NPK and Urea) and sprayed with herbicides ( gramaxone and round-up), The collecting coconut products were sold to middlemens. The Subsistence Exchange Rate was 0.70 (0.70 < 1), and  it means that the revenue of coconut farming was not enough to meet the total expenditure costs of the farmers (both for input of coconut farming and consumtion expenditure).  So it can be classified as unwelfare.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信