柏拉图与行星秩序水星和金星位置的不确定性

IF 0.3 3区 哲学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
James Brannon
{"title":"柏拉图与行星秩序水星和金星位置的不确定性","authors":"James Brannon","doi":"10.1177/00218286231203198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Plato’s Republic and Timaeus, and in the pseudo-Platonic Epinomis, the author(s) discuss the planetary order for the Moon, Sun, and planets. Based on these works, many ancient, medieval, and modern authors assert without explanation that Plato’s order for the first four planets is Moon-Sun-Venus-Mercury. While this order may have been Plato’s intention, this article presents a differing opinion by claiming that Plato’s words lack sufficient clarity for a reader to understand Plato’s order for Mercury and Venus. This claim has a three-fold basis: (1) Plato’s difficult to understand planetary color ideas in Republic do not uniquely identify the order for Mercury and Venus; (2) Historical accounts of planetary color do not always support Venus being whiter than Mercury—an argument sometimes used for Venus residing below Mercury in Plato’s scheme; (3) Neither Timaeus nor Epinomis clearly state the order for the two planets. The paper concludes with brief conjectures on why Plato remained obscure on planetary order.","PeriodicalId":56280,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the History of Astronomy","volume":"9 1","pages":"404 - 424"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plato and planetary order: Uncertainty in the positions of Mercury and Venus\",\"authors\":\"James Brannon\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00218286231203198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Plato’s Republic and Timaeus, and in the pseudo-Platonic Epinomis, the author(s) discuss the planetary order for the Moon, Sun, and planets. Based on these works, many ancient, medieval, and modern authors assert without explanation that Plato’s order for the first four planets is Moon-Sun-Venus-Mercury. While this order may have been Plato’s intention, this article presents a differing opinion by claiming that Plato’s words lack sufficient clarity for a reader to understand Plato’s order for Mercury and Venus. This claim has a three-fold basis: (1) Plato’s difficult to understand planetary color ideas in Republic do not uniquely identify the order for Mercury and Venus; (2) Historical accounts of planetary color do not always support Venus being whiter than Mercury—an argument sometimes used for Venus residing below Mercury in Plato’s scheme; (3) Neither Timaeus nor Epinomis clearly state the order for the two planets. The paper concludes with brief conjectures on why Plato remained obscure on planetary order.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for the History of Astronomy\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"404 - 424\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for the History of Astronomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00218286231203198\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the History of Astronomy","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00218286231203198","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在柏拉图的《共和国》和《蒂迈欧篇》以及伪柏拉图的《埃皮诺米斯篇》中,作者讨论了月亮、太阳和行星的排列顺序。根据这些著作,许多古代、中世纪和现代作者在没有解释的情况下断言,柏拉图对前四颗行星的排序是月亮-太阳-金星-水星。虽然这个顺序可能是柏拉图的本意,但本文提出了不同意见,认为柏拉图的文字不够清晰,读者无法理解柏拉图关于水星和金星的顺序。这一观点有三方面的依据:(1)柏拉图在《共和国》中难以理解的行星颜色观点并不能唯一地确定水星和金星的顺序;(2)关于行星颜色的历史记载并不总是支持金星比水星更白--在柏拉图的方案中,金星有时被用来居于水星之下;(3)《蒂迈欧篇》和《埃皮诺米篇》都没有明确说明两颗行星的顺序。本文最后简要猜测了柏拉图为何对行星顺序保持模糊的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Plato and planetary order: Uncertainty in the positions of Mercury and Venus
In Plato’s Republic and Timaeus, and in the pseudo-Platonic Epinomis, the author(s) discuss the planetary order for the Moon, Sun, and planets. Based on these works, many ancient, medieval, and modern authors assert without explanation that Plato’s order for the first four planets is Moon-Sun-Venus-Mercury. While this order may have been Plato’s intention, this article presents a differing opinion by claiming that Plato’s words lack sufficient clarity for a reader to understand Plato’s order for Mercury and Venus. This claim has a three-fold basis: (1) Plato’s difficult to understand planetary color ideas in Republic do not uniquely identify the order for Mercury and Venus; (2) Historical accounts of planetary color do not always support Venus being whiter than Mercury—an argument sometimes used for Venus residing below Mercury in Plato’s scheme; (3) Neither Timaeus nor Epinomis clearly state the order for the two planets. The paper concludes with brief conjectures on why Plato remained obscure on planetary order.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for the History of Astronomy
Journal for the History of Astronomy 地学天文-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Science History Publications Ltd is an academic publishing company established in 1971 and based in Cambridge, England. We specialize in journals in history of science and in particular history of astronomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信