评估 "公共气候学校"--一项由多个部分组成的校本计划,旨在提高学生的气候意识和行动能力:分组对照试点研究

Jan Keller , Michael Eichinger , Myriam Bechtoldt , Shuyan Liu , Michael Neuber , Felix Peter , Carina Pohle , Gerhard Reese , Fabian Schäfer , Stephan Heinzel
{"title":"评估 \"公共气候学校\"--一项由多个部分组成的校本计划,旨在提高学生的气候意识和行动能力:分组对照试点研究","authors":"Jan Keller ,&nbsp;Michael Eichinger ,&nbsp;Myriam Bechtoldt ,&nbsp;Shuyan Liu ,&nbsp;Michael Neuber ,&nbsp;Felix Peter ,&nbsp;Carina Pohle ,&nbsp;Gerhard Reese ,&nbsp;Fabian Schäfer ,&nbsp;Stephan Heinzel","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2023.100286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Despite the potential of school-based programs targeting climate awareness and action to support students in addressing the climate crisis and to improve their mental health and well-being, there is limited evidence for their effectiveness. In preparation for a cluster-randomized controlled trial, we assessed the feasibility of evaluating the Public Climate School (PCS), a one-week school program in Germany, and its effects on theory-based behavioral and psychological outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>We enrolled 158 students from 11 classes (grades 7–13) into a cluster-controlled pilot study. Four classes were allocated to the waitlist control group and 7 to the intervention group participating in the PCS in November 2021. Using online surveys, we assessed theory-based behavioral and psychological outcomes at baseline and follow-up. Two-level models were used to investigate changes in outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>125 students completed the baseline and follow-up survey (dropout rate: 21 %). For most outcomes we observed no between-group differences, except for pro-environmental communication and engagement (e.g., posting on social media; <em>p</em>=.040) and perceptions of environmental norms (<em>p</em>=.001) in the anticipated direction.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study confirmed the feasibility of evaluating the PCS and provides parameter estimates to guide sample size calculations and study design decisions for future research. Together with recent work on the association between collective action and mental health, the effect of the PCS on pro-environmental communication and engagement highlights the value of examining effects of education for sustainable development programs on student health and linking them to collective action in future work.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667278223000858/pdfft?md5=b0a01b42c7ebe9ebd375787504c2ae62&pid=1-s2.0-S2667278223000858-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Public Climate School, a multi-component school-based program to promote climate awareness and action in students: A cluster-controlled pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Jan Keller ,&nbsp;Michael Eichinger ,&nbsp;Myriam Bechtoldt ,&nbsp;Shuyan Liu ,&nbsp;Michael Neuber ,&nbsp;Felix Peter ,&nbsp;Carina Pohle ,&nbsp;Gerhard Reese ,&nbsp;Fabian Schäfer ,&nbsp;Stephan Heinzel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joclim.2023.100286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Despite the potential of school-based programs targeting climate awareness and action to support students in addressing the climate crisis and to improve their mental health and well-being, there is limited evidence for their effectiveness. In preparation for a cluster-randomized controlled trial, we assessed the feasibility of evaluating the Public Climate School (PCS), a one-week school program in Germany, and its effects on theory-based behavioral and psychological outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>We enrolled 158 students from 11 classes (grades 7–13) into a cluster-controlled pilot study. Four classes were allocated to the waitlist control group and 7 to the intervention group participating in the PCS in November 2021. Using online surveys, we assessed theory-based behavioral and psychological outcomes at baseline and follow-up. Two-level models were used to investigate changes in outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>125 students completed the baseline and follow-up survey (dropout rate: 21 %). For most outcomes we observed no between-group differences, except for pro-environmental communication and engagement (e.g., posting on social media; <em>p</em>=.040) and perceptions of environmental norms (<em>p</em>=.001) in the anticipated direction.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study confirmed the feasibility of evaluating the PCS and provides parameter estimates to guide sample size calculations and study design decisions for future research. Together with recent work on the association between collective action and mental health, the effect of the PCS on pro-environmental communication and engagement highlights the value of examining effects of education for sustainable development programs on student health and linking them to collective action in future work.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of climate change and health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667278223000858/pdfft?md5=b0a01b42c7ebe9ebd375787504c2ae62&pid=1-s2.0-S2667278223000858-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of climate change and health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667278223000858\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of climate change and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667278223000858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言尽管以气候意识和行动为目标的校本项目有可能支持学生应对气候危机并改善他们的心理健康和幸福感,但有关其有效性的证据却很有限。为了准备分组随机对照试验,我们评估了德国为期一周的学校项目--公共气候学校(PCS)的可行性及其对基于理论的行为和心理结果的影响。4 个班级被分配到候补对照组,7 个班级被分配到干预组,参加 2021 年 11 月的 PCS。通过在线调查,我们评估了基线和随访时基于理论的行为和心理结果。结果125名学生完成了基线和后续调查(辍学率:21%)。对于大多数结果,我们没有观察到组间差异,但亲环境交流和参与(如在社交媒体上发帖;p=.040)以及对环境规范的看法(p=.001)在预期方向上存在差异。结合最近关于集体行动与心理健康之间联系的研究,PCS 对亲环境交流和参与的影响突出表明,在未来的工作中,研究可持续发展教育项目对学生健康的影响并将其与集体行动联系起来具有重要价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Public Climate School, a multi-component school-based program to promote climate awareness and action in students: A cluster-controlled pilot study

Introduction

Despite the potential of school-based programs targeting climate awareness and action to support students in addressing the climate crisis and to improve their mental health and well-being, there is limited evidence for their effectiveness. In preparation for a cluster-randomized controlled trial, we assessed the feasibility of evaluating the Public Climate School (PCS), a one-week school program in Germany, and its effects on theory-based behavioral and psychological outcomes.

Material and methods

We enrolled 158 students from 11 classes (grades 7–13) into a cluster-controlled pilot study. Four classes were allocated to the waitlist control group and 7 to the intervention group participating in the PCS in November 2021. Using online surveys, we assessed theory-based behavioral and psychological outcomes at baseline and follow-up. Two-level models were used to investigate changes in outcomes.

Results

125 students completed the baseline and follow-up survey (dropout rate: 21 %). For most outcomes we observed no between-group differences, except for pro-environmental communication and engagement (e.g., posting on social media; p=.040) and perceptions of environmental norms (p=.001) in the anticipated direction.

Conclusion

This study confirmed the feasibility of evaluating the PCS and provides parameter estimates to guide sample size calculations and study design decisions for future research. Together with recent work on the association between collective action and mental health, the effect of the PCS on pro-environmental communication and engagement highlights the value of examining effects of education for sustainable development programs on student health and linking them to collective action in future work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The journal of climate change and health
The journal of climate change and health Global and Planetary Change, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信