{"title":"风车行剧院与爱尔兰人(1796-1804 年):悉尼湾俘虏社会的文明化","authors":"P. Kuch","doi":"10.3366/iur.2023.0618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay examines the role of the Irish, and the performance of Irishness, in the Windmill Row Theatre (1796–1804), which opened a mere eight years after the penal colony of Sydney Cove was established. Influenced by revisionist histories such as Grace Karskens’ The Colony: A History of Early Sydney (2010), and by recent research about the performativity of Irishness on the eighteenth-century London and Dublin stages, it enriches the view that the colony was intended to be ‘a society, not a gaol’. While it offers a corrective to the idea that Sydney Cove was ‘a subsistence colony that would transform felons into farmers’, it takes issue with Robert Jordan's argument in The Convict Theatres of Early Australia (2002) that the theatre would have had little impact on the Irish. It proposes that several plays that were staged constituted a social experiment to manage the gender imbalance in the colony, and also considers the impact of Irish political protest, the role of the 1798 Rising and the effect of the contentious ‘Union of Hearts’ of 1800 on the theatre. It further speculates about Irish convict access to Australia's first commercial theatre, which had its own specifically designed building, booking system, regime of admission prices, and paid staff and actors.","PeriodicalId":43277,"journal":{"name":"IRISH UNIVERSITY REVIEW","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Windmill Row Theatre and the Irish (1796–1804): Civilizing Sydney Cove’s Convict Society\",\"authors\":\"P. Kuch\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/iur.2023.0618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay examines the role of the Irish, and the performance of Irishness, in the Windmill Row Theatre (1796–1804), which opened a mere eight years after the penal colony of Sydney Cove was established. Influenced by revisionist histories such as Grace Karskens’ The Colony: A History of Early Sydney (2010), and by recent research about the performativity of Irishness on the eighteenth-century London and Dublin stages, it enriches the view that the colony was intended to be ‘a society, not a gaol’. While it offers a corrective to the idea that Sydney Cove was ‘a subsistence colony that would transform felons into farmers’, it takes issue with Robert Jordan's argument in The Convict Theatres of Early Australia (2002) that the theatre would have had little impact on the Irish. It proposes that several plays that were staged constituted a social experiment to manage the gender imbalance in the colony, and also considers the impact of Irish political protest, the role of the 1798 Rising and the effect of the contentious ‘Union of Hearts’ of 1800 on the theatre. It further speculates about Irish convict access to Australia's first commercial theatre, which had its own specifically designed building, booking system, regime of admission prices, and paid staff and actors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IRISH UNIVERSITY REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IRISH UNIVERSITY REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/iur.2023.0618\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY REVIEWS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRISH UNIVERSITY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/iur.2023.0618","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY REVIEWS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这篇文章探讨了爱尔兰人在风车行剧院(Windmill Row Theatre,1796-1804 年)中所扮演的角色,以及爱尔兰人的表演。受格蕾丝-卡斯肯斯(Grace Karskens)的《殖民地》(The Colony:A History of Early Sydney》(2010 年)等修正主义历史著作的影响,以及近期对十八世纪伦敦和都柏林舞台上爱尔兰人表演性的研究,丰富了该殖民地旨在成为 "社会而非监狱 "的观点。该书纠正了悉尼湾是 "将重刑犯改造成农民的自给自足的殖民地 "这一观点,同时对罗伯特-乔丹(Robert Jordan)在《早期澳大利亚的囚犯剧院》(The Convict Theatres of Early Australia)(2002 年)中提出的戏剧对爱尔兰人影响甚微的论点提出了质疑。该书提出,上演的几部戏剧是管理殖民地性别不平衡的一种社会实验,还考虑了爱尔兰政治抗议的影响、1798 年起义的作用以及 1800 年有争议的 "心灵联盟 "对剧院的影响。报告还进一步推测了爱尔兰囚犯进入澳大利亚第一家商业剧院的情况,该剧院拥有自己专门设计的建筑、预订系统、票价制度以及带薪的工作人员和演员。
The Windmill Row Theatre and the Irish (1796–1804): Civilizing Sydney Cove’s Convict Society
This essay examines the role of the Irish, and the performance of Irishness, in the Windmill Row Theatre (1796–1804), which opened a mere eight years after the penal colony of Sydney Cove was established. Influenced by revisionist histories such as Grace Karskens’ The Colony: A History of Early Sydney (2010), and by recent research about the performativity of Irishness on the eighteenth-century London and Dublin stages, it enriches the view that the colony was intended to be ‘a society, not a gaol’. While it offers a corrective to the idea that Sydney Cove was ‘a subsistence colony that would transform felons into farmers’, it takes issue with Robert Jordan's argument in The Convict Theatres of Early Australia (2002) that the theatre would have had little impact on the Irish. It proposes that several plays that were staged constituted a social experiment to manage the gender imbalance in the colony, and also considers the impact of Irish political protest, the role of the 1798 Rising and the effect of the contentious ‘Union of Hearts’ of 1800 on the theatre. It further speculates about Irish convict access to Australia's first commercial theatre, which had its own specifically designed building, booking system, regime of admission prices, and paid staff and actors.
期刊介绍:
Since its launch in 1970, the Irish University Review has sought to foster and publish the best scholarly research and critical debate in Irish literary and cultural studies. The first issue contained contributions by Austin Clarke, John Montague, Sean O"Faolain, and Conor Cruise O"Brien, among others. Today, the journal publishes the best literary and cultural criticism by established and emerging scholars in Irish Studies. It is published twice annually, in the Spring and Autumn of each year. The journal is based in University College Dublin, where it was founded in 1970 by Professor Maurice Harmon, who edited the journal from 1970 to 1987. It has subsequently been edited by Professor Christopher Murray (1987-1997).