膀胱切除术和尿路转流术后的功能随访:叙述性综述

Ernest Kaufmann, Peter C. Black, James W. F. Catto, H. Djaladat, S. Ghodoussipour, Jill M. Hamilton-Reeves, Bente Thoft Jensen, W. Kassouf, S. V. Lauridsen, S. P. Lerner, Carlos Llorente, Katherine Loftus, Ilaria Lucca, Alberto Martini, Mark A. Preston, S. P. Psutka, J. Sfakianos, Jay Shah, M. S. Wettstein, Stephen B. Williams, S. Daneshmand, C. Fankhauser
{"title":"膀胱切除术和尿路转流术后的功能随访:叙述性综述","authors":"Ernest Kaufmann, Peter C. Black, James W. F. Catto, H. Djaladat, S. Ghodoussipour, Jill M. Hamilton-Reeves, Bente Thoft Jensen, W. Kassouf, S. V. Lauridsen, S. P. Lerner, Carlos Llorente, Katherine Loftus, Ilaria Lucca, Alberto Martini, Mark A. Preston, S. P. Psutka, J. Sfakianos, Jay Shah, M. S. Wettstein, Stephen B. Williams, S. Daneshmand, C. Fankhauser","doi":"10.1097/ju9.0000000000000071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Follow-up after urinary diversion aims to detect functional complications to prevent harm and improve quality of life. We conducted a literature search and reviewed guidelines and institutional follow-up protocols. We included 14 studies providing data of 3282 patients. Functional complications can be seen in up to 90% of all patients within 15 years after urinary diversion and mainly include impairment of urinary or sexual function as well as renal/metabolic disturbances, but only limited evidence supporting any functional follow-up recommendation was identified. Current guideline recommendation should be rephrased to ensure routine implementation of functional follow-up investigation. Future research is required to assess whether, which, and how follow-up protocols after cystectomy affect functional results to inform optimal surveillance procedures after treatment. In this review of recommended follow-up protocols after cystectomy, we observed different recommendations and discuss future research areas.","PeriodicalId":74033,"journal":{"name":"JU open plus","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional Follow-Up After Cystectomy and Urinary Diversion: A Narrative Review\",\"authors\":\"Ernest Kaufmann, Peter C. Black, James W. F. Catto, H. Djaladat, S. Ghodoussipour, Jill M. Hamilton-Reeves, Bente Thoft Jensen, W. Kassouf, S. V. Lauridsen, S. P. Lerner, Carlos Llorente, Katherine Loftus, Ilaria Lucca, Alberto Martini, Mark A. Preston, S. P. Psutka, J. Sfakianos, Jay Shah, M. S. Wettstein, Stephen B. Williams, S. Daneshmand, C. Fankhauser\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ju9.0000000000000071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Follow-up after urinary diversion aims to detect functional complications to prevent harm and improve quality of life. We conducted a literature search and reviewed guidelines and institutional follow-up protocols. We included 14 studies providing data of 3282 patients. Functional complications can be seen in up to 90% of all patients within 15 years after urinary diversion and mainly include impairment of urinary or sexual function as well as renal/metabolic disturbances, but only limited evidence supporting any functional follow-up recommendation was identified. Current guideline recommendation should be rephrased to ensure routine implementation of functional follow-up investigation. Future research is required to assess whether, which, and how follow-up protocols after cystectomy affect functional results to inform optimal surveillance procedures after treatment. In this review of recommended follow-up protocols after cystectomy, we observed different recommendations and discuss future research areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JU open plus\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JU open plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju9.0000000000000071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JU open plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju9.0000000000000071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尿路转流术后的随访旨在发现功能性并发症,以预防伤害并提高生活质量。 我们进行了文献检索,并查阅了指南和机构随访协议。 我们纳入了 14 项研究,提供了 3282 例患者的数据。在尿路改道术后 15 年内,高达 90% 的患者会出现功能性并发症,主要包括泌尿或性功能受损以及肾脏/代谢紊乱,但仅有有限的证据支持任何功能性随访建议。目前的指南建议应重新措辞,以确保常规实施功能性随访调查。 未来的研究需要评估膀胱切除术后的随访方案是否、哪些以及如何影响功能结果,从而为治疗后的最佳监测程序提供依据。 在这篇关于膀胱切除术后推荐随访方案的综述中,我们观察到了不同的建议,并讨论了未来的研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Functional Follow-Up After Cystectomy and Urinary Diversion: A Narrative Review
Follow-up after urinary diversion aims to detect functional complications to prevent harm and improve quality of life. We conducted a literature search and reviewed guidelines and institutional follow-up protocols. We included 14 studies providing data of 3282 patients. Functional complications can be seen in up to 90% of all patients within 15 years after urinary diversion and mainly include impairment of urinary or sexual function as well as renal/metabolic disturbances, but only limited evidence supporting any functional follow-up recommendation was identified. Current guideline recommendation should be rephrased to ensure routine implementation of functional follow-up investigation. Future research is required to assess whether, which, and how follow-up protocols after cystectomy affect functional results to inform optimal surveillance procedures after treatment. In this review of recommended follow-up protocols after cystectomy, we observed different recommendations and discuss future research areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信