比较动态关节角度计 Pro 应用程序和屈曲曲线测量胸椎后凸的可靠性:一项横断面研究

IF 0.5 Q4 REHABILITATION
Ayşen Canan Pakeloğlu, Meltem Koç, Aydan Selen Yılmaz, B. Bayar, K. Bayar
{"title":"比较动态关节角度计 Pro 应用程序和屈曲曲线测量胸椎后凸的可靠性:一项横断面研究","authors":"Ayşen Canan Pakeloğlu, Meltem Koç, Aydan Selen Yılmaz, B. Bayar, K. Bayar","doi":"10.12968/ijtr.2023.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most common spinal anomaly is thoracic kyphosis, which frequently occurs in adolescents and older people. The flexicurve is an instrument commonly used by physiotherapists to assess spinal curvature. However, advancing technology, particularly the rise of mobile applications, has resulted in the replacement of traditional methods. This study aimed to investigate and compare the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the smartphone-based Goniometer Pro application and the flexicurve in measuring the thoracic kyphosis angle among healthy university students. A total of 30 participants were assessed by two independent raters using the flexicurve and the Goniometer Pro App to measure the thoracic kyphosis angle. Agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients, standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change. The flexicurve demonstrated excellent intra-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients=0.87 and intraclass correlation coefficients=0.85 for two raters) and good inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients=0.60). Additionally, the standard error of measurement and the minimal detectable change values indicated small measurement errors for the flexicurve. Similarly, the Goniometer Pro application exhibited excellent intra-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients=0.90 and intraclass correlation coefficients=0.89 for two raters) and inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients=0.87), along with small measurement errors indicated by the standard error of the measurement and minimal detectable change values. The Goniometer Pro app demonstrated higher inter-rater reliability than the flexicurve when measuring the thoracic kyphosis angle. Consequently, it stands out as a recommended, user-friendly, and time-efficient tool for clinicians involved in the assessment and monitoring of thoracic kyphosis.","PeriodicalId":46562,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the reliability of the Goniometer Pro application and flexicurve for measuring thoracic kyphosis: a cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Ayşen Canan Pakeloğlu, Meltem Koç, Aydan Selen Yılmaz, B. Bayar, K. Bayar\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/ijtr.2023.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The most common spinal anomaly is thoracic kyphosis, which frequently occurs in adolescents and older people. The flexicurve is an instrument commonly used by physiotherapists to assess spinal curvature. However, advancing technology, particularly the rise of mobile applications, has resulted in the replacement of traditional methods. This study aimed to investigate and compare the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the smartphone-based Goniometer Pro application and the flexicurve in measuring the thoracic kyphosis angle among healthy university students. A total of 30 participants were assessed by two independent raters using the flexicurve and the Goniometer Pro App to measure the thoracic kyphosis angle. Agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients, standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change. The flexicurve demonstrated excellent intra-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients=0.87 and intraclass correlation coefficients=0.85 for two raters) and good inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients=0.60). Additionally, the standard error of measurement and the minimal detectable change values indicated small measurement errors for the flexicurve. Similarly, the Goniometer Pro application exhibited excellent intra-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients=0.90 and intraclass correlation coefficients=0.89 for two raters) and inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients=0.87), along with small measurement errors indicated by the standard error of the measurement and minimal detectable change values. The Goniometer Pro app demonstrated higher inter-rater reliability than the flexicurve when measuring the thoracic kyphosis angle. Consequently, it stands out as a recommended, user-friendly, and time-efficient tool for clinicians involved in the assessment and monitoring of thoracic kyphosis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2023.0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2023.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最常见的脊柱异常是胸椎后凸,经常发生在青少年和老年人身上。屈曲曲线是物理治疗师常用来评估脊柱弯曲的仪器。然而,随着技术的进步,特别是移动应用的兴起,传统方法已被取代。本研究旨在调查和比较基于智能手机的 Goniometer Pro 应用程序和屈曲曲线在测量健康大学生胸椎后凸角度时的评分者内部和评分者之间的可靠性。两名独立评分员使用屈曲曲线和 Goniometer Pro 应用程序测量胸椎后倾角,共对 30 名参与者进行了评估。使用类内相关系数、测量标准误差和最小可检测变化来评估一致性。屈曲曲线显示出极佳的评分者内部可靠性(两位评分者的类内相关系数=0.87,类内相关系数=0.85)和良好的评分者之间可靠性(类内相关系数=0.60)。此外,测量标准误差和最小可检测变化值表明屈曲曲线的测量误差很小。同样,动态关节角度计 Pro 应用程序也表现出极佳的评分者内部可靠性(类内相关系数=0.90,两名评分者的类内相关系数=0.89)和评分者之间可靠性(类内相关系数=0.87),测量标准误差和最小可检测变化值表明测量误差较小。在测量胸椎后凸角度时,Goniometer Pro 应用程序的评分者间可靠性高于挠性曲线。因此,对于参与胸椎后凸评估和监测的临床医生来说,它是一款值得推荐、用户友好且省时的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing the reliability of the Goniometer Pro application and flexicurve for measuring thoracic kyphosis: a cross-sectional study
The most common spinal anomaly is thoracic kyphosis, which frequently occurs in adolescents and older people. The flexicurve is an instrument commonly used by physiotherapists to assess spinal curvature. However, advancing technology, particularly the rise of mobile applications, has resulted in the replacement of traditional methods. This study aimed to investigate and compare the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the smartphone-based Goniometer Pro application and the flexicurve in measuring the thoracic kyphosis angle among healthy university students. A total of 30 participants were assessed by two independent raters using the flexicurve and the Goniometer Pro App to measure the thoracic kyphosis angle. Agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients, standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change. The flexicurve demonstrated excellent intra-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients=0.87 and intraclass correlation coefficients=0.85 for two raters) and good inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients=0.60). Additionally, the standard error of measurement and the minimal detectable change values indicated small measurement errors for the flexicurve. Similarly, the Goniometer Pro application exhibited excellent intra-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients=0.90 and intraclass correlation coefficients=0.89 for two raters) and inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients=0.87), along with small measurement errors indicated by the standard error of the measurement and minimal detectable change values. The Goniometer Pro app demonstrated higher inter-rater reliability than the flexicurve when measuring the thoracic kyphosis angle. Consequently, it stands out as a recommended, user-friendly, and time-efficient tool for clinicians involved in the assessment and monitoring of thoracic kyphosis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
40.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation (IJTR) publishes original research, providing a platform for the latest key research findings in therapy and rehabilitation. Review and analysis articles are invited internationally to enable the sharing of practices and developments worldwide, and to raise awareness of different cultural influences in health care. IJTR provides an interdisciplinary approach to therapy and rehabilitation by: -Providing a well-referenced source of information to all professionals involved in therapy and rehabilitation worldwide, including occupational therapists, physiotherapists, chiropodists and podiatrists, radiographers, speech and language therapists and orthoptists -Providing a peer-reviewed source of original research and information presented in an accessible, informative and professional medium -Providing a forum for the discussion of new ideas, information and issues relating to therapy and rehabilitation -Creating an awareness of the national and international issues affecting professionals involved in therapy and rehabilitation -Encouraging collaboration and sharing of new ideas between professions worldwide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信