海水中尿素定量的二乙酰基一肟法的验证

Q4 Earth and Planetary Sciences
Nishant Saxena, P. S. Chandrashekharaiah, Debanjan Sanyal, Ajit Sapre, Santanu Dasgupta
{"title":"海水中尿素定量的二乙酰基一肟法的验证","authors":"Nishant Saxena, P. S. Chandrashekharaiah, Debanjan Sanyal, Ajit Sapre, Santanu Dasgupta","doi":"10.25303/2712rjce1600168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urea is widely used in agriculture and aquaculture as a major source of nitrogenous fertilizer. Therefore, urea exists in dissolved form in the marine/freshwater ecosystem. However, if the concentration in waterbodies is higher than a threshold limit, it can be toxic to fish and prawns. Therefore, accurate measurement of urea is a must even in marine water systems. Estimation of urea from freshwater samples using colorimetric method is well established. The well-known diacetyl monoxime method is widely used for accurate estimation of urea from fresh water as well as various biological samples. The presence of various interfering ions in sea water affects the estimation and limits the adaptability of any new methods directly into sea water. The accurate and precise estimation of urea are essential to optimize the nutrient addition. In this study, the diacetyl monoxime method was considered for urea estimation in sea water (3.5% salinity) and the method was validated for specificity, linearity, robustness, ruggedness and sensitivity as per International Council for Harmonization guidelines. During this study, urea showed maximum absorbance at 524 nm wavelength in both the samples. This method was found linear up to 100 ppm of urea in fresh and sea water samples. The variations of wavelength by 5-10%, reagent volumes by 2.5-5%, sample storage, analysis did not show any significant impact on the estimation of urea from both the samples. However, the method was found more sensitive and showed the limit of detection of 0.5 ppm in fresh water and 1.5 ppm in sea water. The overall results indicate that this method is accurate and robust for sea water samples and therefore can be used for estimation of urea in sea water samples.","PeriodicalId":21012,"journal":{"name":"Research Journal of Chemistry and Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of Diacetyl Monoxime Method for Quantification of Urea in Sea Water\",\"authors\":\"Nishant Saxena, P. S. Chandrashekharaiah, Debanjan Sanyal, Ajit Sapre, Santanu Dasgupta\",\"doi\":\"10.25303/2712rjce1600168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Urea is widely used in agriculture and aquaculture as a major source of nitrogenous fertilizer. Therefore, urea exists in dissolved form in the marine/freshwater ecosystem. However, if the concentration in waterbodies is higher than a threshold limit, it can be toxic to fish and prawns. Therefore, accurate measurement of urea is a must even in marine water systems. Estimation of urea from freshwater samples using colorimetric method is well established. The well-known diacetyl monoxime method is widely used for accurate estimation of urea from fresh water as well as various biological samples. The presence of various interfering ions in sea water affects the estimation and limits the adaptability of any new methods directly into sea water. The accurate and precise estimation of urea are essential to optimize the nutrient addition. In this study, the diacetyl monoxime method was considered for urea estimation in sea water (3.5% salinity) and the method was validated for specificity, linearity, robustness, ruggedness and sensitivity as per International Council for Harmonization guidelines. During this study, urea showed maximum absorbance at 524 nm wavelength in both the samples. This method was found linear up to 100 ppm of urea in fresh and sea water samples. The variations of wavelength by 5-10%, reagent volumes by 2.5-5%, sample storage, analysis did not show any significant impact on the estimation of urea from both the samples. However, the method was found more sensitive and showed the limit of detection of 0.5 ppm in fresh water and 1.5 ppm in sea water. The overall results indicate that this method is accurate and robust for sea water samples and therefore can be used for estimation of urea in sea water samples.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Journal of Chemistry and Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Journal of Chemistry and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25303/2712rjce1600168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Journal of Chemistry and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25303/2712rjce1600168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尿素广泛用于农业和水产养殖业,是氮肥的主要来源。因此,尿素以溶解形式存在于海洋/淡水生态系统中。然而,如果水体中的尿素浓度高于阈值限值,就会对鱼虾产生毒性。因此,即使在海水系统中,也必须对尿素进行精确测量。使用比色法估算淡水样本中的尿素已得到广泛认可。众所周知的二乙酰一肟法被广泛用于精确测定淡水和各种生物样本中的尿素。海水中各种干扰离子的存在影响了估算结果,限制了任何新方法直接用于海水的适应性。准确和精确地估算尿素对优化营养添加至关重要。本研究采用二乙酰一肟法来估算海水(盐度为 3.5%)中的尿素含量,并根据国际协调理事会的指导原则对该方法的特异性、线性、稳健性、坚固性和灵敏度进行了验证。在这项研究中,尿素在 524 纳米波长处显示出最大吸光度。在淡水和海水样品中,尿素的线性范围为 100 ppm。波长变化 5%-10%、试剂量变化 2.5%-5%、样品储存和分析对两种样品中尿素的估算均无明显影响。不过,该方法的灵敏度更高,在淡水中的检测限为 0.5 ppm,在海水中的检测限为 1.5 ppm。总体结果表明,该方法对海水样本的测定准确、可靠,因此可用于海水样本中尿素的估算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of Diacetyl Monoxime Method for Quantification of Urea in Sea Water
Urea is widely used in agriculture and aquaculture as a major source of nitrogenous fertilizer. Therefore, urea exists in dissolved form in the marine/freshwater ecosystem. However, if the concentration in waterbodies is higher than a threshold limit, it can be toxic to fish and prawns. Therefore, accurate measurement of urea is a must even in marine water systems. Estimation of urea from freshwater samples using colorimetric method is well established. The well-known diacetyl monoxime method is widely used for accurate estimation of urea from fresh water as well as various biological samples. The presence of various interfering ions in sea water affects the estimation and limits the adaptability of any new methods directly into sea water. The accurate and precise estimation of urea are essential to optimize the nutrient addition. In this study, the diacetyl monoxime method was considered for urea estimation in sea water (3.5% salinity) and the method was validated for specificity, linearity, robustness, ruggedness and sensitivity as per International Council for Harmonization guidelines. During this study, urea showed maximum absorbance at 524 nm wavelength in both the samples. This method was found linear up to 100 ppm of urea in fresh and sea water samples. The variations of wavelength by 5-10%, reagent volumes by 2.5-5%, sample storage, analysis did not show any significant impact on the estimation of urea from both the samples. However, the method was found more sensitive and showed the limit of detection of 0.5 ppm in fresh water and 1.5 ppm in sea water. The overall results indicate that this method is accurate and robust for sea water samples and therefore can be used for estimation of urea in sea water samples.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
195
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信