宅基地增值收益分配制度立法完善研究

Dongzhou He
{"title":"宅基地增值收益分配制度立法完善研究","authors":"Dongzhou He","doi":"10.54097/ijeh.v11i2.13550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From 2013 to 2021, the For eight consecutive years, the Central No. 1 document and relevant meetings have repeatedly proposed to gradually improve the protection of rural homestead rights and interests and improve farmers' property income. As the rural collective construction land, the rural construction land with the widest audience, the largest area and the most far-reaching impact of interests is an important property enjoyed by farmers and farmers. How to formulate a fair and reasonable compensation method for homestead expropriation and the distribution method of value-added income generated after expropriation is an important link of homestead system reform in China. From the current distribution standard of homestead value-added income in our country, it is still far from the real fair and reasonable distribution standard of homestead value-added income. The distribution standard of \"District comprehensive land price\" for house land value-added income adopted in the Land Administration and Administration Law of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Land Administration Law of 2019) amended in 2019 is higher than that of the annual output value multiple method adopted in the Land Administration and Administration Law of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Land Administration Law of 2014) for house land The value income distribution standard has some progressive significance, but the compensation standard is still very low. This paper conducts judicial empirical research on the distribution of value-added income of homestead, and analyzes the distribution of value-added income of homestead from three aspects: system introduction, collection scope and compensation principle.","PeriodicalId":133235,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Education and Humanities","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on Legislative Improvement of The Distribution System of Value-Added Income of Homestead\",\"authors\":\"Dongzhou He\",\"doi\":\"10.54097/ijeh.v11i2.13550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"From 2013 to 2021, the For eight consecutive years, the Central No. 1 document and relevant meetings have repeatedly proposed to gradually improve the protection of rural homestead rights and interests and improve farmers' property income. As the rural collective construction land, the rural construction land with the widest audience, the largest area and the most far-reaching impact of interests is an important property enjoyed by farmers and farmers. How to formulate a fair and reasonable compensation method for homestead expropriation and the distribution method of value-added income generated after expropriation is an important link of homestead system reform in China. From the current distribution standard of homestead value-added income in our country, it is still far from the real fair and reasonable distribution standard of homestead value-added income. The distribution standard of \\\"District comprehensive land price\\\" for house land value-added income adopted in the Land Administration and Administration Law of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Land Administration Law of 2019) amended in 2019 is higher than that of the annual output value multiple method adopted in the Land Administration and Administration Law of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Land Administration Law of 2014) for house land The value income distribution standard has some progressive significance, but the compensation standard is still very low. This paper conducts judicial empirical research on the distribution of value-added income of homestead, and analyzes the distribution of value-added income of homestead from three aspects: system introduction, collection scope and compensation principle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":133235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Education and Humanities\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Education and Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v11i2.13550\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Education and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v11i2.13550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从2013年到2021年,连续8年的中央一号文件和相关会议多次提出,要逐步完善农村宅基地权益保护,提高农民财产性收入。作为受众面最广、面积最大、利益影响最深远的农村集体建设用地,是农民和农户享有的重要财产。如何制定公平合理的宅基地征收补偿办法和征收后产生的增值收益分配办法,是我国宅基地制度改革的重要环节。从我国目前的宅基地增值收益分配标准来看,离真正公平合理的宅基地增值收益分配标准还相差甚远。2019 年修订的《中华人民共和国土地管理法》(以下简称 2019 年《土地管理法》)采用的 "区综合地价 "的宅基地增值收益分配标准高于《中华人民共和国土地管理法》(以下简称 2014 年《土地管理法》)采用的年产值倍数法的宅基地 增值收益分配标准,具有一定的进步意义,但补偿标准仍然很低。本文对宅基地增值收益分配进行司法实证研究,从制度引入、征收范围、补偿原则三个方面对宅基地增值收益分配进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research on Legislative Improvement of The Distribution System of Value-Added Income of Homestead
From 2013 to 2021, the For eight consecutive years, the Central No. 1 document and relevant meetings have repeatedly proposed to gradually improve the protection of rural homestead rights and interests and improve farmers' property income. As the rural collective construction land, the rural construction land with the widest audience, the largest area and the most far-reaching impact of interests is an important property enjoyed by farmers and farmers. How to formulate a fair and reasonable compensation method for homestead expropriation and the distribution method of value-added income generated after expropriation is an important link of homestead system reform in China. From the current distribution standard of homestead value-added income in our country, it is still far from the real fair and reasonable distribution standard of homestead value-added income. The distribution standard of "District comprehensive land price" for house land value-added income adopted in the Land Administration and Administration Law of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Land Administration Law of 2019) amended in 2019 is higher than that of the annual output value multiple method adopted in the Land Administration and Administration Law of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Land Administration Law of 2014) for house land The value income distribution standard has some progressive significance, but the compensation standard is still very low. This paper conducts judicial empirical research on the distribution of value-added income of homestead, and analyzes the distribution of value-added income of homestead from three aspects: system introduction, collection scope and compensation principle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信