{"title":"赫拉克利特辩证思想中的经验困境","authors":"Hangxiao Lin","doi":"10.54097/ijeh.v11i2.13748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Heraclitus' flux doctrine has been criticized for its unilateral emphasis on absolute motion while neglecting relative stability, which leads to a lack of clear positioning and evaluation of experience in his theory of the unity of opposites. This confusion is evident in various descriptions found in the surviving fragments of Heraclitus and has also sparked debates among subsequent scholars researching Heraclitus' theory of knowledge.","PeriodicalId":133235,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Education and Humanities","volume":"221 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Experience Dilemma in Heraclitus' Dialectical Thought\",\"authors\":\"Hangxiao Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.54097/ijeh.v11i2.13748\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Heraclitus' flux doctrine has been criticized for its unilateral emphasis on absolute motion while neglecting relative stability, which leads to a lack of clear positioning and evaluation of experience in his theory of the unity of opposites. This confusion is evident in various descriptions found in the surviving fragments of Heraclitus and has also sparked debates among subsequent scholars researching Heraclitus' theory of knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":133235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Education and Humanities\",\"volume\":\"221 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Education and Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v11i2.13748\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Education and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v11i2.13748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Experience Dilemma in Heraclitus' Dialectical Thought
Heraclitus' flux doctrine has been criticized for its unilateral emphasis on absolute motion while neglecting relative stability, which leads to a lack of clear positioning and evaluation of experience in his theory of the unity of opposites. This confusion is evident in various descriptions found in the surviving fragments of Heraclitus and has also sparked debates among subsequent scholars researching Heraclitus' theory of knowledge.