羟氯喹的暴露前预防对严重柯维-19 疾病的影响:随机对照试验

Mahnaz Valizadeh, Termeh Tarjoman, B. Farhoudi, Arezoo Chouhdari, M. Mesgarian, Seyedahmad Seyedalinaghi, M. Zangeneh, Zahra Hanifezadeh, Hesam Adain Atashi, Hamidreza Massumi naini, Shahla Abolghasemi, M. Dezfulinejad, S. Haghani
{"title":"羟氯喹的暴露前预防对严重柯维-19 疾病的影响:随机对照试验","authors":"Mahnaz Valizadeh, Termeh Tarjoman, B. Farhoudi, Arezoo Chouhdari, M. Mesgarian, Seyedahmad Seyedalinaghi, M. Zangeneh, Zahra Hanifezadeh, Hesam Adain Atashi, Hamidreza Massumi naini, Shahla Abolghasemi, M. Dezfulinejad, S. Haghani","doi":"10.15789/2220-7619-etp-14481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In vitro studies have shown some effects for Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) against SARS-COV-2 virus. Despite effective vaccination program, relatively large proportion of population remains unvaccinated. So, there still remains a need for other prophylactic measures. The present study aims to evaluate whether HCQ can prevent severe COVID-19 outcomes among health-care workers. Methods: In this randomized, double blind placebo-controlled clinical trial 334 healthcare workers aged 18-65 year-old were included of whom 278 individuals completed the study. Participants were randomly assigned to the HCQ group (800 mg at day one, followed by 400 mg weekly for the next 7 weeks); or the placebo group. Participants were followed three weeks after the last dose of drug or placebo (10 weeks from the first dose of drug or placebo). The primary outcome was hospitalization or death from COVID-19. Results: Of 148 people who received HCQ, none were hospitalized or died from COIVD-19, while of 130 people who received the placebo, 2 (1.5%) were hospitalized or died for COIVD-19 (p value:0.26). And, 22 (14.9%) people in the HCQ group and 15 (11.6%) people in the placebo group contracted COVID-19 (p-value:0.99). Adverse reactions were reported by 5 (3.4%) of participants in the HCQ group and 5 (3.9%) of participants in the placebo group ( p value:0.99). Conclusion: We found that HCQ has no significant prevention effect on the incidence of mild COVID-19. However; The low rate of hospitalization (the primary outcome) in this trial like most of the other clinical trials with HCQ would have required increasing the sample size considerably to be able to comment on the effectiveness of HCQ in prevention of severe forms including death rate. This justifies systematic reviews to include similar studies to further investigate the issue.","PeriodicalId":21412,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Infection and Immunity","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EFFECT THE PRE-EXPOSURE PROPHYLACTIC OF HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE ON SEVERE COVID-19 DISEASE: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL\",\"authors\":\"Mahnaz Valizadeh, Termeh Tarjoman, B. Farhoudi, Arezoo Chouhdari, M. Mesgarian, Seyedahmad Seyedalinaghi, M. Zangeneh, Zahra Hanifezadeh, Hesam Adain Atashi, Hamidreza Massumi naini, Shahla Abolghasemi, M. Dezfulinejad, S. Haghani\",\"doi\":\"10.15789/2220-7619-etp-14481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: In vitro studies have shown some effects for Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) against SARS-COV-2 virus. Despite effective vaccination program, relatively large proportion of population remains unvaccinated. So, there still remains a need for other prophylactic measures. The present study aims to evaluate whether HCQ can prevent severe COVID-19 outcomes among health-care workers. Methods: In this randomized, double blind placebo-controlled clinical trial 334 healthcare workers aged 18-65 year-old were included of whom 278 individuals completed the study. Participants were randomly assigned to the HCQ group (800 mg at day one, followed by 400 mg weekly for the next 7 weeks); or the placebo group. Participants were followed three weeks after the last dose of drug or placebo (10 weeks from the first dose of drug or placebo). The primary outcome was hospitalization or death from COVID-19. Results: Of 148 people who received HCQ, none were hospitalized or died from COIVD-19, while of 130 people who received the placebo, 2 (1.5%) were hospitalized or died for COIVD-19 (p value:0.26). And, 22 (14.9%) people in the HCQ group and 15 (11.6%) people in the placebo group contracted COVID-19 (p-value:0.99). Adverse reactions were reported by 5 (3.4%) of participants in the HCQ group and 5 (3.9%) of participants in the placebo group ( p value:0.99). Conclusion: We found that HCQ has no significant prevention effect on the incidence of mild COVID-19. However; The low rate of hospitalization (the primary outcome) in this trial like most of the other clinical trials with HCQ would have required increasing the sample size considerably to be able to comment on the effectiveness of HCQ in prevention of severe forms including death rate. This justifies systematic reviews to include similar studies to further investigate the issue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian Journal of Infection and Immunity\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian Journal of Infection and Immunity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15789/2220-7619-etp-14481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Infection and Immunity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15789/2220-7619-etp-14481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:体外研究表明,羟氯喹(HCQ)对 SARS-COV-2 病毒有一定的抑制作用。尽管疫苗接种计划卓有成效,但仍有相当大比例的人没有接种疫苗。因此,仍有必要采取其他预防措施。本研究旨在评估 HCQ 能否预防医护人员感染严重的 COVID-19 后果。 研究方法在这项随机、双盲安慰剂对照临床试验中,共纳入了 334 名 18-65 岁的医护人员,其中 278 人完成了研究。参与者被随机分配到 HCQ 组(第一天服用 800 毫克,之后 7 周每周服用 400 毫克)或安慰剂组。在最后一次服用药物或安慰剂三周后(自首次服用药物或安慰剂起 10 周),对参与者进行随访。主要结果是因COVID-19住院或死亡。 研究结果在接受HCQ治疗的148人中,没有人因COVID-19住院或死亡,而在接受安慰剂治疗的130人中,有2人(1.5%)因COVID-19住院或死亡(P值:0.26)。HCQ组有22人(14.9%)和安慰剂组有15人(11.6%)感染了COVID-19(P值:0.99)。HCQ组有5人(3.4%)报告了不良反应,安慰剂组有5人(3.9%)报告了不良反应(P值:0.99)。 结论我们发现,HCQ 对轻度 COVID-19 的发生率没有明显的预防作用。然而,与其他大多数使用 HCQ 的临床试验一样,本试验中的住院率(主要结果)较低,这就需要大大增加样本量,才能对 HCQ 在预防严重病症(包括死亡率)方面的有效性做出评论。因此,有必要进行系统回顾,纳入类似研究,以进一步调查这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EFFECT THE PRE-EXPOSURE PROPHYLACTIC OF HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE ON SEVERE COVID-19 DISEASE: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Background: In vitro studies have shown some effects for Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) against SARS-COV-2 virus. Despite effective vaccination program, relatively large proportion of population remains unvaccinated. So, there still remains a need for other prophylactic measures. The present study aims to evaluate whether HCQ can prevent severe COVID-19 outcomes among health-care workers. Methods: In this randomized, double blind placebo-controlled clinical trial 334 healthcare workers aged 18-65 year-old were included of whom 278 individuals completed the study. Participants were randomly assigned to the HCQ group (800 mg at day one, followed by 400 mg weekly for the next 7 weeks); or the placebo group. Participants were followed three weeks after the last dose of drug or placebo (10 weeks from the first dose of drug or placebo). The primary outcome was hospitalization or death from COVID-19. Results: Of 148 people who received HCQ, none were hospitalized or died from COIVD-19, while of 130 people who received the placebo, 2 (1.5%) were hospitalized or died for COIVD-19 (p value:0.26). And, 22 (14.9%) people in the HCQ group and 15 (11.6%) people in the placebo group contracted COVID-19 (p-value:0.99). Adverse reactions were reported by 5 (3.4%) of participants in the HCQ group and 5 (3.9%) of participants in the placebo group ( p value:0.99). Conclusion: We found that HCQ has no significant prevention effect on the incidence of mild COVID-19. However; The low rate of hospitalization (the primary outcome) in this trial like most of the other clinical trials with HCQ would have required increasing the sample size considerably to be able to comment on the effectiveness of HCQ in prevention of severe forms including death rate. This justifies systematic reviews to include similar studies to further investigate the issue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信