测试双极化前沿高能电子加速的绝热模型

S. Chepuri, A. Jaynes, D. L. Turner, C. Gabrielse, I. Cohen, D. N. Baker, B. Mauk, T. Leonard, J. Blake, J. F. Fennell
{"title":"测试双极化前沿高能电子加速的绝热模型","authors":"S. Chepuri, A. Jaynes, D. L. Turner, C. Gabrielse, I. Cohen, D. N. Baker, B. Mauk, T. Leonard, J. Blake, J. F. Fennell","doi":"10.3389/fspas.2023.1266412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Betatron acceleration is commonly cited as a primary accelerator of energetic electrons at dipolarization fronts, and many case studies compare observed energetic electrons measurements to a betatron model. In this work, we extend this to a statistical study. We identified 168 dipolarizations with an enhanced flux of energetic electrons at Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS). We compared the observed flux of energetic electrons above 1 keV to a betatron acceleration model assuming a source population similar to the population in the quiet plasma sheet and found that, on average, the model slightly overestimated the observation, but there was a wide spread of errors. We then tested characteristics such as position, change in and strength of magnetic field, and wave power to determine if any of these characteristics affected the accuracy of the model; the only clear correlations were that the model was less accurate when the initial total magnetic field was smaller and when there was a higher Ey during the dipolarization. Since the betatron model did not explain our observations very well, we repeated with a full adiabatic model that included a Fermi acceleration component as well. We found that the adiabatic model slightly underestimated the observations, but with a smaller error than the betatron model under the same assumptions. Testing the same parameters, we found that the adiabatic model also did not strongly rely on any of the parameters except the initial magnetic field, and the anti-correlation with Ey was no longer present. The fact that neither model was generally applicable means that either adiabatic processes alone are not enough to explain electron acceleration at dipolarization fronts in general, or the common assumption we used, that the source population has the same phase space density as the cold pre-existing population, is not valid.","PeriodicalId":507437,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing adiabatic models of energetic electron acceleration at dipolarization fronts\",\"authors\":\"S. Chepuri, A. Jaynes, D. L. Turner, C. Gabrielse, I. Cohen, D. N. Baker, B. Mauk, T. Leonard, J. Blake, J. F. Fennell\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fspas.2023.1266412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Betatron acceleration is commonly cited as a primary accelerator of energetic electrons at dipolarization fronts, and many case studies compare observed energetic electrons measurements to a betatron model. In this work, we extend this to a statistical study. We identified 168 dipolarizations with an enhanced flux of energetic electrons at Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS). We compared the observed flux of energetic electrons above 1 keV to a betatron acceleration model assuming a source population similar to the population in the quiet plasma sheet and found that, on average, the model slightly overestimated the observation, but there was a wide spread of errors. We then tested characteristics such as position, change in and strength of magnetic field, and wave power to determine if any of these characteristics affected the accuracy of the model; the only clear correlations were that the model was less accurate when the initial total magnetic field was smaller and when there was a higher Ey during the dipolarization. Since the betatron model did not explain our observations very well, we repeated with a full adiabatic model that included a Fermi acceleration component as well. We found that the adiabatic model slightly underestimated the observations, but with a smaller error than the betatron model under the same assumptions. Testing the same parameters, we found that the adiabatic model also did not strongly rely on any of the parameters except the initial magnetic field, and the anti-correlation with Ey was no longer present. The fact that neither model was generally applicable means that either adiabatic processes alone are not enough to explain electron acceleration at dipolarization fronts in general, or the common assumption we used, that the source population has the same phase space density as the cold pre-existing population, is not valid.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2023.1266412\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2023.1266412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

倍他加速通常被认为是双极化前沿高能电子的主要加速器,许多案例研究都将观测到的高能电子测量结果与倍他加速模型进行比较。在这项工作中,我们将其扩展为一项统计研究。我们在磁层多尺度(MMS)上确定了 168 个高能电子通量增强的双极化。我们将观测到的 1 千伏以上的高能电子通量与假定源群与安静等离子体片中的源群相似的贝塔电子加速模型进行了比较,发现平均而言,模型略微高估了观测结果,但误差范围很广。我们随后测试了磁场的位置、变化和强度以及波功率等特征,以确定这些特征是否会影响模型的准确性;唯一明确的相关性是,当初始总磁场较小时,以及在偶极化过程中Ey较高时,模型的准确性较低。由于贝塔特伦模型不能很好地解释我们的观测结果,我们又使用了一个完全绝热模型,其中也包括费米加速成分。我们发现绝热模型略微低估了观测结果,但在相同的假设条件下,其误差小于贝塔子模型。在测试同样的参数时,我们发现绝热模型除了初始磁场外,对其他参数的依赖性也不强,而且与 Ey 的反相关性也不复存在。这两个模型都不能普遍适用的事实意味着,要么绝热过程本身不足以解释偶极化前沿的电子加速现象,要么我们使用的常见假设--源群体与冷的先存群体具有相同的相空间密度--是不成立的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Testing adiabatic models of energetic electron acceleration at dipolarization fronts
Betatron acceleration is commonly cited as a primary accelerator of energetic electrons at dipolarization fronts, and many case studies compare observed energetic electrons measurements to a betatron model. In this work, we extend this to a statistical study. We identified 168 dipolarizations with an enhanced flux of energetic electrons at Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS). We compared the observed flux of energetic electrons above 1 keV to a betatron acceleration model assuming a source population similar to the population in the quiet plasma sheet and found that, on average, the model slightly overestimated the observation, but there was a wide spread of errors. We then tested characteristics such as position, change in and strength of magnetic field, and wave power to determine if any of these characteristics affected the accuracy of the model; the only clear correlations were that the model was less accurate when the initial total magnetic field was smaller and when there was a higher Ey during the dipolarization. Since the betatron model did not explain our observations very well, we repeated with a full adiabatic model that included a Fermi acceleration component as well. We found that the adiabatic model slightly underestimated the observations, but with a smaller error than the betatron model under the same assumptions. Testing the same parameters, we found that the adiabatic model also did not strongly rely on any of the parameters except the initial magnetic field, and the anti-correlation with Ey was no longer present. The fact that neither model was generally applicable means that either adiabatic processes alone are not enough to explain electron acceleration at dipolarization fronts in general, or the common assumption we used, that the source population has the same phase space density as the cold pre-existing population, is not valid.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信