人类价值体系、企业、国家和社会特性的兼容性问题

Anzor Abralava, Grigol Abralava
{"title":"人类价值体系、企业、国家和社会特性的兼容性问题","authors":"Anzor Abralava, Grigol Abralava","doi":"10.31578/jcl.v2i2.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two forms of relations of the state economic authority with the economic agents areanalyzed: 1) paternalism and 2) free cooperation, the role of economic governance performed in relationto the state economic agents. The development trend of institutions that appear between the stateand individual private owners and begin to perform the function of economic mediator, carrier of localinterests, representative in state government bodies is analyzed. This trend is titled corporatism, and itsmodern variant is neo-corporatism. It is noted that the prevailing type of socio-economic thinking affectsthe system of social partnership. Three behavioral stereotypes are possible in the public mentality: a)in dominance-subordination relations, b) in the system of confrontation (power relation/confrontation)c) in cooperative relations (cooperation). While discussing t the problems, attention is payed on the followingissues: 1) formation of civil society and degree of development of corporatism; 2) tripartism andproblems of establishing social-labor relations; 3) ways to overcome the “economy of natural persons”;4) The concept of a new public agreement between the government and civil society. The question ofthe relationship between paternalism and private initiative is analyzed, the analysis of the results of thesocio-economic attitude research in Georgia is presented.","PeriodicalId":81646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of contemporary law","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Problems of compatibility of specificities of human values system, business, state and society\",\"authors\":\"Anzor Abralava, Grigol Abralava\",\"doi\":\"10.31578/jcl.v2i2.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two forms of relations of the state economic authority with the economic agents areanalyzed: 1) paternalism and 2) free cooperation, the role of economic governance performed in relationto the state economic agents. The development trend of institutions that appear between the stateand individual private owners and begin to perform the function of economic mediator, carrier of localinterests, representative in state government bodies is analyzed. This trend is titled corporatism, and itsmodern variant is neo-corporatism. It is noted that the prevailing type of socio-economic thinking affectsthe system of social partnership. Three behavioral stereotypes are possible in the public mentality: a)in dominance-subordination relations, b) in the system of confrontation (power relation/confrontation)c) in cooperative relations (cooperation). While discussing t the problems, attention is payed on the followingissues: 1) formation of civil society and degree of development of corporatism; 2) tripartism andproblems of establishing social-labor relations; 3) ways to overcome the “economy of natural persons”;4) The concept of a new public agreement between the government and civil society. The question ofthe relationship between paternalism and private initiative is analyzed, the analysis of the results of thesocio-economic attitude research in Georgia is presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":81646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of contemporary law\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of contemporary law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31578/jcl.v2i2.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of contemporary law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31578/jcl.v2i2.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分析了国家经济权力机构与经济行为主体之间的两种关系形式:1)家长式管理;2)自由合作,以及与国家经济行为主体相关的经济管理角色。分析了出现在国家和个体私营业主之间的机构的发展趋势,这些机构开始履行经济调解人、地方利益载体、国家政府机构代表的职能。这种趋势被称为公司主义,其现代变体是新公司主义。我们注意到,当前的社会经济思维类型影响着社会伙伴关系体系。在公众思维中可能存在三种行为定式:a) 统治-服从关系;b) 对抗体系(权力关系/对抗);c) 合作关系(合作)。在讨论这些问题时,我们关注以下问题:1) 公民社会的形成和公司制的发展程度;2) 三方主义和建立社会劳动关系的问题;3) 克服 "自然人经济 "的方法;4) 政府与公民社会之间新公共协议的概念。分析了家长制与私人倡议之间的关系问题,并介绍了对格鲁吉亚社会经济态度研究结果的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Problems of compatibility of specificities of human values system, business, state and society
Two forms of relations of the state economic authority with the economic agents areanalyzed: 1) paternalism and 2) free cooperation, the role of economic governance performed in relationto the state economic agents. The development trend of institutions that appear between the stateand individual private owners and begin to perform the function of economic mediator, carrier of localinterests, representative in state government bodies is analyzed. This trend is titled corporatism, and itsmodern variant is neo-corporatism. It is noted that the prevailing type of socio-economic thinking affectsthe system of social partnership. Three behavioral stereotypes are possible in the public mentality: a)in dominance-subordination relations, b) in the system of confrontation (power relation/confrontation)c) in cooperative relations (cooperation). While discussing t the problems, attention is payed on the followingissues: 1) formation of civil society and degree of development of corporatism; 2) tripartism andproblems of establishing social-labor relations; 3) ways to overcome the “economy of natural persons”;4) The concept of a new public agreement between the government and civil society. The question ofthe relationship between paternalism and private initiative is analyzed, the analysis of the results of thesocio-economic attitude research in Georgia is presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信