用于加固土壤的替代性轻质复合板构件

Burak Evi̇rgen, Onur Tunaboyu, Barış Büyük, Gizem Tuğçe Çi̇l
{"title":"用于加固土壤的替代性轻质复合板构件","authors":"Burak Evi̇rgen, Onur Tunaboyu, Barış Büyük, Gizem Tuğçe Çi̇l","doi":"10.17482/uumfd.1286985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Steel reinforced concrete facing members, which are used to fix geosynthetic reinforcements working against tensile forces inside soils and to resist active lateral earth pressures, have certain disadvantages, such as massiveness and corrosion. In addition, the aforementioned conventional panels are not economical since they frequently require maintenance and repair in terms of long-term stability. In this study, the utility of alternative composite panels is evaluated with the various arrangement and type of fiber reinforcements and a typical foam concrete. Panel tests and three-point bending tests are realized to determine the experimental behavior of steel, carbon fiber (CFRP) and glass fiber reinforced (GFRP) specimens, as well as unreinforced examples. Although CFRP wrapped specimens cannot reach expected levels, samples with GFRP present favorable performance as well as being cheaper. Specimens with mat GFRP enhance both strength and deformation capacities according to the results of axial and lateral deformations under diagonal loading condition. In addition, chopped GFRP applied foam concrete specimens have more strength in terms of bending test results, but CFRP reinforcements increase their displacement capacity.","PeriodicalId":23451,"journal":{"name":"Uludağ University Journal of The Faculty of Engineering","volume":"63 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Donatılı Zeminler için Alternatif Hafif Kompozit Panel Elemanları\",\"authors\":\"Burak Evi̇rgen, Onur Tunaboyu, Barış Büyük, Gizem Tuğçe Çi̇l\",\"doi\":\"10.17482/uumfd.1286985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Steel reinforced concrete facing members, which are used to fix geosynthetic reinforcements working against tensile forces inside soils and to resist active lateral earth pressures, have certain disadvantages, such as massiveness and corrosion. In addition, the aforementioned conventional panels are not economical since they frequently require maintenance and repair in terms of long-term stability. In this study, the utility of alternative composite panels is evaluated with the various arrangement and type of fiber reinforcements and a typical foam concrete. Panel tests and three-point bending tests are realized to determine the experimental behavior of steel, carbon fiber (CFRP) and glass fiber reinforced (GFRP) specimens, as well as unreinforced examples. Although CFRP wrapped specimens cannot reach expected levels, samples with GFRP present favorable performance as well as being cheaper. Specimens with mat GFRP enhance both strength and deformation capacities according to the results of axial and lateral deformations under diagonal loading condition. In addition, chopped GFRP applied foam concrete specimens have more strength in terms of bending test results, but CFRP reinforcements increase their displacement capacity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Uludağ University Journal of The Faculty of Engineering\",\"volume\":\"63 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Uludağ University Journal of The Faculty of Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.1286985\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uludağ University Journal of The Faculty of Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.1286985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

钢筋混凝土面板用于固定土工合成材料加固件,以抵御土壤内部的拉力,并抵抗活跃的侧向土压力,但它也有一些缺点,如质量大、易腐蚀。此外,上述传统面板在长期稳定性方面经常需要维护和修理,因此并不经济。在本研究中,我们评估了采用不同排列方式和类型的纤维加固材料以及典型泡沫混凝土的替代复合板的实用性。通过面板试验和三点弯曲试验,确定了钢、碳纤维(CFRP)和玻璃纤维增强(GFRP)试样以及未增强试样的实验行为。虽然包裹 CFRP 的试样无法达到预期水平,但使用 GFRP 的试样性能良好,而且成本更低。根据对角线加载条件下的轴向和侧向变形结果,采用 GFRP 垫层的试样可提高强度和变形能力。此外,从弯曲试验结果来看,采用切碎 GFRP 的泡沫混凝土试样强度更高,但 CFRP 增强材料提高了其位移能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Donatılı Zeminler için Alternatif Hafif Kompozit Panel Elemanları
Steel reinforced concrete facing members, which are used to fix geosynthetic reinforcements working against tensile forces inside soils and to resist active lateral earth pressures, have certain disadvantages, such as massiveness and corrosion. In addition, the aforementioned conventional panels are not economical since they frequently require maintenance and repair in terms of long-term stability. In this study, the utility of alternative composite panels is evaluated with the various arrangement and type of fiber reinforcements and a typical foam concrete. Panel tests and three-point bending tests are realized to determine the experimental behavior of steel, carbon fiber (CFRP) and glass fiber reinforced (GFRP) specimens, as well as unreinforced examples. Although CFRP wrapped specimens cannot reach expected levels, samples with GFRP present favorable performance as well as being cheaper. Specimens with mat GFRP enhance both strength and deformation capacities according to the results of axial and lateral deformations under diagonal loading condition. In addition, chopped GFRP applied foam concrete specimens have more strength in terms of bending test results, but CFRP reinforcements increase their displacement capacity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信