美国的收入不平等:利用税收数据衡量长期趋势

IF 6.9 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Gerald E. Auten, David Splinter
{"title":"美国的收入不平等:利用税收数据衡量长期趋势","authors":"Gerald E. Auten, David Splinter","doi":"10.1086/728741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Top income share estimates based only on individual tax returns (Piketty and Saez, 2003) are biased by tax-base changes, major social changes, and missing income sources. Addressing these issues requires numerous assumptions, especially for broadening income beyond that reported on tax returns. This paper shows the effects of adjusting for technical tax issues and the sensitivity to alternative assumptions for distributing missing income sources. Our estimates of the distribution of national income suggest that since 1980 top income shares are lower and have increased less than other tax-based studies. Since the early 1960s, increasing government transfers and tax progressivity have resulted in little change in after-tax top income shares. data Views and opinions expressed are of the and do official Treasury or policy. This paper embodies the of the Joint Committee on but as members of both and both houses of the Joint Committee","PeriodicalId":16875,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Political Economy","volume":"4 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Income Inequality in the United States: Using Tax Data to Measure Long-Term Trends\",\"authors\":\"Gerald E. Auten, David Splinter\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/728741\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Top income share estimates based only on individual tax returns (Piketty and Saez, 2003) are biased by tax-base changes, major social changes, and missing income sources. Addressing these issues requires numerous assumptions, especially for broadening income beyond that reported on tax returns. This paper shows the effects of adjusting for technical tax issues and the sensitivity to alternative assumptions for distributing missing income sources. Our estimates of the distribution of national income suggest that since 1980 top income shares are lower and have increased less than other tax-based studies. Since the early 1960s, increasing government transfers and tax progressivity have resulted in little change in after-tax top income shares. data Views and opinions expressed are of the and do official Treasury or policy. This paper embodies the of the Joint Committee on but as members of both and both houses of the Joint Committee\",\"PeriodicalId\":16875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Political Economy\",\"volume\":\"4 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/728741\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/728741","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

仅根据个人报税表估算的最高收入份额(Piketty 和 Saez,2003 年)因税基变化、重大社会变革和收入来源缺失而存在偏差。解决这些问题需要大量假设,特别是在扩大纳税申报表以外的收入时。本文展示了对税收技术问题进行调整的效果,以及对缺失收入来源分配的其他假设的敏感性。我们对国民收入分配的估算表明,自 1980 年以来,与其他基于税收的研究相比,最高收入份额较低,且增长幅度较小。自 20 世纪 60 年代初以来,政府转移支付的增加和税收累进性导致税后最高收入份额变化不大。本文体现了联合委员会的观点,但作为联合委员会参众两院的成员,本文不代表联合委员会的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Income Inequality in the United States: Using Tax Data to Measure Long-Term Trends
Top income share estimates based only on individual tax returns (Piketty and Saez, 2003) are biased by tax-base changes, major social changes, and missing income sources. Addressing these issues requires numerous assumptions, especially for broadening income beyond that reported on tax returns. This paper shows the effects of adjusting for technical tax issues and the sensitivity to alternative assumptions for distributing missing income sources. Our estimates of the distribution of national income suggest that since 1980 top income shares are lower and have increased less than other tax-based studies. Since the early 1960s, increasing government transfers and tax progressivity have resulted in little change in after-tax top income shares. data Views and opinions expressed are of the and do official Treasury or policy. This paper embodies the of the Joint Committee on but as members of both and both houses of the Joint Committee
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
2.40%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: Established in 1892, the Journal of Political Economy (JPE) stands as one of the oldest and most esteemed journals in economics. It showcases significant research and scholarship in economic theory and practice, with a focus on publishing highly selective, widely cited articles of current relevance. JPE's analytical, interpretive, and empirical studies cover diverse areas such as monetary theory, fiscal policy, labor economics, development, micro- and macroeconomic theory, international trade and finance, industrial organization, and social economics. Essential reading for economists seeking to stay abreast of groundbreaking research in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信