{"title":"患者对在日间妇科手术中使用脊髓麻醉的满意度","authors":"Nweze Onochie Uchenna, Ebirim Longinus Ndubuisi, Alagbe-Briggs OlubusolaTemitope","doi":"10.55320/mjz.49.4.392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patient Satisfaction is defined as the individual’s positive evaluation of a distinct dimension of care. Satisfaction is positive when the perception of the care given meets pateints’ level of expectation. The ideal anaesthesia for ambulatory procedures should provide a rapid and smooth onset of action, good intraoperative analgesia, good operating condition, short recovery time free from side effect and high level of patient satisfaction. Patient satisfaction is a vital part of assessing quality of care, and different instruments have been developed to measure it without a consensus on an ideal one. Achieving high satisfaction among patients that undergo day case gynaecological procedures under spinal would promote the acceptance of this anaesthetic technique in our locality. Method: This was an observational prospective study in which ninety (90) patients aged 18 – 45 years with ASA class I or II scheduled for day case gynaecological procedures were recruited. Spinal anaesthesia was given in sitting position using a range of 7.5mg to 10mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. The procedures lasted less than one (1) hour, during which the haemodynamic parameters (SBP, DBP MAP Pulse rate, and Spo2) were monitored continually. Patients were discharged home on the same day of procedure. Two days following the procedure, a structured questionnaire on patient’s satisfaction level was administered via phone call and data collected included satisfaction with explanation of the anaesthesia for the procedure, postoperative complications and overall level of satisfaction, and acceptance of spinal anaesthesia in the future. Results: Outcome showed that 88 patients (97.8%) were overall satisfied with the use of spinal anaesthesia for Day case gynaecological procedures and 2 patients (2.2%) were not satisfied with the anaesthetic technique used for the procedure. All the patients accepted to use spinal anaesthesia for similar procedure in the future.","PeriodicalId":74149,"journal":{"name":"Medical journal of Zambia","volume":"185 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient’s Satisfaction with Use of Spinal Anaesthesia for Day-Case gynaecological procedures\",\"authors\":\"Nweze Onochie Uchenna, Ebirim Longinus Ndubuisi, Alagbe-Briggs OlubusolaTemitope\",\"doi\":\"10.55320/mjz.49.4.392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Patient Satisfaction is defined as the individual’s positive evaluation of a distinct dimension of care. Satisfaction is positive when the perception of the care given meets pateints’ level of expectation. The ideal anaesthesia for ambulatory procedures should provide a rapid and smooth onset of action, good intraoperative analgesia, good operating condition, short recovery time free from side effect and high level of patient satisfaction. Patient satisfaction is a vital part of assessing quality of care, and different instruments have been developed to measure it without a consensus on an ideal one. Achieving high satisfaction among patients that undergo day case gynaecological procedures under spinal would promote the acceptance of this anaesthetic technique in our locality. Method: This was an observational prospective study in which ninety (90) patients aged 18 – 45 years with ASA class I or II scheduled for day case gynaecological procedures were recruited. Spinal anaesthesia was given in sitting position using a range of 7.5mg to 10mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. The procedures lasted less than one (1) hour, during which the haemodynamic parameters (SBP, DBP MAP Pulse rate, and Spo2) were monitored continually. Patients were discharged home on the same day of procedure. Two days following the procedure, a structured questionnaire on patient’s satisfaction level was administered via phone call and data collected included satisfaction with explanation of the anaesthesia for the procedure, postoperative complications and overall level of satisfaction, and acceptance of spinal anaesthesia in the future. Results: Outcome showed that 88 patients (97.8%) were overall satisfied with the use of spinal anaesthesia for Day case gynaecological procedures and 2 patients (2.2%) were not satisfied with the anaesthetic technique used for the procedure. All the patients accepted to use spinal anaesthesia for similar procedure in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical journal of Zambia\",\"volume\":\"185 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical journal of Zambia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55320/mjz.49.4.392\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical journal of Zambia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55320/mjz.49.4.392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:病人满意度的定义是个人对护理的某一不同方面的积极评价。当患者对所提供的护理服务的感知达到其期望水平时,其满意度就是正面的。理想的非卧床手术麻醉应该是起效迅速、平稳,术中镇痛效果好,手术条件好,恢复时间短,无副作用,病人满意度高。患者满意度是评估医疗质量的重要组成部分,目前已开发出不同的测量工具,但尚未就理想的测量工具达成共识。如果在脊柱麻醉下进行日间妇科手术的患者满意度较高,将促进该麻醉技术在本地的接受度。研究方法这是一项前瞻性观察研究,共招募了 90 名年龄在 18-45 岁之间、ASA 分级为 I 级或 II 级、计划接受日间妇科手术的患者。患者采取坐位,使用7.5毫克至10毫克的0.5%高压布比卡因进行脊柱麻醉。手术持续时间不到一(1)小时,在此期间持续监测血流动力学参数(SBP、DBP、MAP 脉搏率和 Spo2)。患者在手术当天出院回家。术后两天,通过电话对患者的满意度进行了结构化问卷调查,收集的数据包括对手术麻醉解释的满意度、术后并发症和总体满意度,以及今后对脊髓麻醉的接受程度。结果显示结果显示,88 名患者(97.8%)对在日间妇科手术中使用脊髓麻醉总体满意,2 名患者(2.2%)对手术中使用的麻醉技术不满意。所有患者都同意今后在类似手术中使用脊髓麻醉。
Patient’s Satisfaction with Use of Spinal Anaesthesia for Day-Case gynaecological procedures
Background: Patient Satisfaction is defined as the individual’s positive evaluation of a distinct dimension of care. Satisfaction is positive when the perception of the care given meets pateints’ level of expectation. The ideal anaesthesia for ambulatory procedures should provide a rapid and smooth onset of action, good intraoperative analgesia, good operating condition, short recovery time free from side effect and high level of patient satisfaction. Patient satisfaction is a vital part of assessing quality of care, and different instruments have been developed to measure it without a consensus on an ideal one. Achieving high satisfaction among patients that undergo day case gynaecological procedures under spinal would promote the acceptance of this anaesthetic technique in our locality. Method: This was an observational prospective study in which ninety (90) patients aged 18 – 45 years with ASA class I or II scheduled for day case gynaecological procedures were recruited. Spinal anaesthesia was given in sitting position using a range of 7.5mg to 10mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. The procedures lasted less than one (1) hour, during which the haemodynamic parameters (SBP, DBP MAP Pulse rate, and Spo2) were monitored continually. Patients were discharged home on the same day of procedure. Two days following the procedure, a structured questionnaire on patient’s satisfaction level was administered via phone call and data collected included satisfaction with explanation of the anaesthesia for the procedure, postoperative complications and overall level of satisfaction, and acceptance of spinal anaesthesia in the future. Results: Outcome showed that 88 patients (97.8%) were overall satisfied with the use of spinal anaesthesia for Day case gynaecological procedures and 2 patients (2.2%) were not satisfied with the anaesthetic technique used for the procedure. All the patients accepted to use spinal anaesthesia for similar procedure in the future.