Peter Andersson, Ulla-Karin Schön, P. Svedberg, Katarina Grim
{"title":"探索利益相关者的观点,促进在协调的个人护理规划中实施共同决策","authors":"Peter Andersson, Ulla-Karin Schön, P. Svedberg, Katarina Grim","doi":"10.1080/13691457.2023.2281868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores conditions for implementing shared decision-making (SDM) in coordinated individual care planning (CIP) with individuals with complex mental health needs. SDM in CIP are described as central, although such user centred collaboration still remains to be realised. Research underlines the need for a changed way of working, where user expertise is valued and a balance of power is promoted. The aim of the present study is to investigate the conditions for implementing SDM in connection with CIP for and with people with mental illness. To better understand the context and conditions that can promote such an implementation, altogether 15 participants were interviewed in three regions in Sweden within the scope of a stakeholder analysis. Both hindering and supporting factors were identi fi ed with respect to an implementation process, such as sta ff turnover, di ff erences in work culture and committed leadership. Further focus should be directed speci fi cally towards professionals working more closely with CIP and towards in-depth analysis of the construct of culture in terms of implementation processes","PeriodicalId":12060,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Work","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring stakeholder perspectives to facilitate the implementation of shared decision-making in coordinated individual care planning\",\"authors\":\"Peter Andersson, Ulla-Karin Schön, P. Svedberg, Katarina Grim\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13691457.2023.2281868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores conditions for implementing shared decision-making (SDM) in coordinated individual care planning (CIP) with individuals with complex mental health needs. SDM in CIP are described as central, although such user centred collaboration still remains to be realised. Research underlines the need for a changed way of working, where user expertise is valued and a balance of power is promoted. The aim of the present study is to investigate the conditions for implementing SDM in connection with CIP for and with people with mental illness. To better understand the context and conditions that can promote such an implementation, altogether 15 participants were interviewed in three regions in Sweden within the scope of a stakeholder analysis. Both hindering and supporting factors were identi fi ed with respect to an implementation process, such as sta ff turnover, di ff erences in work culture and committed leadership. Further focus should be directed speci fi cally towards professionals working more closely with CIP and towards in-depth analysis of the construct of culture in terms of implementation processes\",\"PeriodicalId\":12060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Social Work\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Social Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2023.2281868\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2023.2281868","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring stakeholder perspectives to facilitate the implementation of shared decision-making in coordinated individual care planning
This article explores conditions for implementing shared decision-making (SDM) in coordinated individual care planning (CIP) with individuals with complex mental health needs. SDM in CIP are described as central, although such user centred collaboration still remains to be realised. Research underlines the need for a changed way of working, where user expertise is valued and a balance of power is promoted. The aim of the present study is to investigate the conditions for implementing SDM in connection with CIP for and with people with mental illness. To better understand the context and conditions that can promote such an implementation, altogether 15 participants were interviewed in three regions in Sweden within the scope of a stakeholder analysis. Both hindering and supporting factors were identi fi ed with respect to an implementation process, such as sta ff turnover, di ff erences in work culture and committed leadership. Further focus should be directed speci fi cally towards professionals working more closely with CIP and towards in-depth analysis of the construct of culture in terms of implementation processes
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Social Work provides a forum for the social professions in all parts of Europe and beyond. It analyses and promotes European and international developments in social work, social policy, social service institutions, and strategies for social change by publishing refereed papers on contemporary key issues. Contributions include theoretical debates, empirical studies, research notes, country perspectives, and reviews. It maintains an interdisciplinary perspective which recognises positively the diversity of cultural and conceptual traditions in which the social professions of Europe are grounded. In particular it examines emerging European paradigms in methodology and comparative analysis.