识别西班牙语和波兰语中的直接和间接补语

Q3 Arts and Humanities

Studia Romanica Posnaniensia Pub Date : 2023-11-16 DOI:10.14746/strop.2023.50.3.5

Monika Lisowska

{"title":"识别西班牙语和波兰语中的直接和间接补语","authors":"Monika Lisowska","doi":"10.14746/strop.2023.50.3.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to compare the methods of identifying the direct and indirect object in Spanish and Polish. From the author’s point of view, Spanish relies more on semantic methods, while Polish relies more on formal ones, especially those related to the category of case. As the article strives to demonstrate, the two approaches can be significant for the different interpretations of objects in both languages.","PeriodicalId":35131,"journal":{"name":"Studia Romanica Posnaniensia","volume":"37 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La identificación de complementos directos e indirectos en español y polaco\",\"authors\":\"Monika Lisowska\",\"doi\":\"10.14746/strop.2023.50.3.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this paper is to compare the methods of identifying the direct and indirect object in Spanish and Polish. From the author’s point of view, Spanish relies more on semantic methods, while Polish relies more on formal ones, especially those related to the category of case. As the article strives to demonstrate, the two approaches can be significant for the different interpretations of objects in both languages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Romanica Posnaniensia\",\"volume\":\"37 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Romanica Posnaniensia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14746/strop.2023.50.3.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Romanica Posnaniensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/strop.2023.50.3.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在比较西班牙语和波兰语中识别直接宾语和间接宾语的方法。作者认为，西班牙语更依赖于语义方法，而波兰语更依赖于形式方法，尤其是与情况类别相关的方法。正如文章试图证明的那样，这两种方法对两种语言中宾语的不同解释都有重要意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

La identificación de complementos directos e indirectos en español y polaco

The aim of this paper is to compare the methods of identifying the direct and indirect object in Spanish and Polish. From the author’s point of view, Spanish relies more on semantic methods, while Polish relies more on formal ones, especially those related to the category of case. As the article strives to demonstrate, the two approaches can be significant for the different interpretations of objects in both languages.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Studia Romanica Posnaniensia Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory

CiteScore

0.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

24 weeks