环境、伦理与实体经济学》,《经济学》(Economia Aziendale)。历史和本体论方面

G. Galassi
{"title":"环境、伦理与实体经济学》,《经济学》(Economia Aziendale)。历史和本体论方面","authors":"G. Galassi","doi":"10.26784/issn.1886-1881.20.2.9376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper stresses the failure of ‘economics’ to predict and prevent repeated economic crises and the most critical topic of the environmental failure and ecological crises, founded also on economic theories and misconceived choices. The implication is a search for alternatives through an ontological-evolutionary-institutional approach and empirical investigations. The search for political ‘normative economics’, entity economics, accounting and information science copes with social and ecological-environmental problems, and systems science; it is necessary to keep always in mind these interactions for fully understand and correctly interpret the present ‘social-economic reality’. The problem concerning environmental decisions goes beyond ontology and belongs to ethics. It must underline the debates on ‘evolutionary ethics’, not only related with ‘environmental and ecological economics’, the management of environment and reporting, but also with ‘evolutionary ontology’; the new perspective affirms that ‘existence’, for instance, of a moral behavioral attitude, can reveal itself as a ‘norm’ thus relating ethics to ontology. General economists, entity economics theorists, as well as accountants and information scientists should be familiar with the potentials and limits of ‘ontology’, also for the ongoing expansion of computerization of scientific research in most of the scientific domains. The renewed interest, particularly in ontology, arouse specifically from systems scientists in constructing a wide variety of artificial intelligent systems.  For its analysis, the study has been structured into two periods of time: until the middle of the 20th century and from that moment on. The paper ends by showing the new developments in information systems and their ontological approach","PeriodicalId":504859,"journal":{"name":"De Computis, Revista Española de Historia de la Contabilidad.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environment, Ethics, and Entity Economics, Economia Aziendale. Historical and Ontological Aspects\",\"authors\":\"G. Galassi\",\"doi\":\"10.26784/issn.1886-1881.20.2.9376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper stresses the failure of ‘economics’ to predict and prevent repeated economic crises and the most critical topic of the environmental failure and ecological crises, founded also on economic theories and misconceived choices. The implication is a search for alternatives through an ontological-evolutionary-institutional approach and empirical investigations. The search for political ‘normative economics’, entity economics, accounting and information science copes with social and ecological-environmental problems, and systems science; it is necessary to keep always in mind these interactions for fully understand and correctly interpret the present ‘social-economic reality’. The problem concerning environmental decisions goes beyond ontology and belongs to ethics. It must underline the debates on ‘evolutionary ethics’, not only related with ‘environmental and ecological economics’, the management of environment and reporting, but also with ‘evolutionary ontology’; the new perspective affirms that ‘existence’, for instance, of a moral behavioral attitude, can reveal itself as a ‘norm’ thus relating ethics to ontology. General economists, entity economics theorists, as well as accountants and information scientists should be familiar with the potentials and limits of ‘ontology’, also for the ongoing expansion of computerization of scientific research in most of the scientific domains. The renewed interest, particularly in ontology, arouse specifically from systems scientists in constructing a wide variety of artificial intelligent systems.  For its analysis, the study has been structured into two periods of time: until the middle of the 20th century and from that moment on. The paper ends by showing the new developments in information systems and their ontological approach\",\"PeriodicalId\":504859,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"De Computis, Revista Española de Historia de la Contabilidad.\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"De Computis, Revista Española de Historia de la Contabilidad.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26784/issn.1886-1881.20.2.9376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"De Computis, Revista Española de Historia de la Contabilidad.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26784/issn.1886-1881.20.2.9376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文强调了 "经济学 "在预测和预防反复出现的经济危机方面的失败,以及环境失败和生态危机这一最关键的话题,其基础也是经济理论和错误的选择。这意味着要通过本体论-进化论-制度的方法和实证调查来寻找替代方案。 寻求政治 "规范经济学"、实体经济学、会计和信息科学与社会和生态环境问题以及系统科学的结合;必须始终牢记这些相互作用,以充分理解和正确解释当前的 "社会经济现实"。 有关环境决策的问题超越了本体论,属于伦理学范畴。必须强调的是,关于 "进化伦理学 "的辩论不仅与 "环境和生态经济学"、环境管理和报告有关,而且与 "进化本体论 "有关;新的视角肯定了 "存在",例如,道德行为态度,可以作为一种 "规范 "显示出来,从而将伦理学与本体论联系起来。 普通经济学家、实体经济理论家以及会计师和信息科学家都应熟悉 "本体论 "的潜力和局限性,这也是因为大多数科学领域的科学研究都在不断扩展计算机化。系统科学家在构建各种人工智能系统的过程中对本体论重新产生了浓厚的兴趣。 为了便于分析,本研究分为两个时期:20 世纪中叶以前和 20 世纪中叶以后。本文最后介绍了信息系统及其本体论方法的新发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Environment, Ethics, and Entity Economics, Economia Aziendale. Historical and Ontological Aspects
The paper stresses the failure of ‘economics’ to predict and prevent repeated economic crises and the most critical topic of the environmental failure and ecological crises, founded also on economic theories and misconceived choices. The implication is a search for alternatives through an ontological-evolutionary-institutional approach and empirical investigations. The search for political ‘normative economics’, entity economics, accounting and information science copes with social and ecological-environmental problems, and systems science; it is necessary to keep always in mind these interactions for fully understand and correctly interpret the present ‘social-economic reality’. The problem concerning environmental decisions goes beyond ontology and belongs to ethics. It must underline the debates on ‘evolutionary ethics’, not only related with ‘environmental and ecological economics’, the management of environment and reporting, but also with ‘evolutionary ontology’; the new perspective affirms that ‘existence’, for instance, of a moral behavioral attitude, can reveal itself as a ‘norm’ thus relating ethics to ontology. General economists, entity economics theorists, as well as accountants and information scientists should be familiar with the potentials and limits of ‘ontology’, also for the ongoing expansion of computerization of scientific research in most of the scientific domains. The renewed interest, particularly in ontology, arouse specifically from systems scientists in constructing a wide variety of artificial intelligent systems.  For its analysis, the study has been structured into two periods of time: until the middle of the 20th century and from that moment on. The paper ends by showing the new developments in information systems and their ontological approach
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信